It's coming
Along with new RWD models
>>14747538
Evidence?
>>14747541
I forgot this is /o/ and no one knows how to Google
>>14747538
>cafe getting ever stricter
>new rwd models from a company that is kinda strapped for cash
sure buddy.
>>14747556
continued: If massive nissan says it'd be too expensive to produce the IDx, you think mazda can build a new rwd model?
>>14747556
>strapped for cash.
They partnered with Toyota
Try to keep up with automotive news before you open your dick holster
>>14747570
>year old news
>only says "we've teamed up to make cars better"
At first it was funny, but now it's just sad seeing people get baited and switched from every Jap manufacturer over and over and still believing anything good is ever going to come off that island again
>hey check out this awesome concept
>it's a lightweight RWD fun car
>we're going to make it
>haha NOT, enjoy another crossover
>>14747603
Well of course nothing good will come off that island again. It's all designed in the us and built in the us or mexico.
>>14747603
this, as much as it sucks
>toyota shows off the SFR, a cheap lil lightweight two seater that's barebones as fuck and basically a hardtop miata competitor
>hasn't been at any carshow in months
although if it's any consolation lexus is more hit and less miss lately
>>14747619
>It's all designed in the us
Sarcasm or is there some truth to that?
>>14747669
Sarcasm
More likely just a dumbass
Please don't get my hopes up anon
>>14747669
All jap manufacturers have design studios in the us, engineering is split, and most jap cars sold in the us market are built here.
>>14747634
>2016+
>FT86 Still doesnt have a factory forced induction option
Fucking why
WHY THE DAMN CAR IS 7 YEARS OLD
I love Mazda but their future vehicle prospects are like, way beyond any possible capability, considering how slowly even larger companies take to do shit
>300hp AWD MS3/MS6 w/2.5L turbo from CX-9
>RX-9
>RWD shitboxes
Considering they're just getting the CX-9 out the door and the Miata RF is probably next, I think it's going to be years until we see any of the above.
Get ready boys - RX-9 and a rwd Mazda Coupe.
fucking based
>>14747538
My quest is, if they do a MS3/MS6.
Will they change the 2.5T's characteristics as super low end torque machine?
Or change to be more traditional?
I ask because this will probably need a hardware change (head and turbo) instead of just a tune.
>>14747775
wow.. I can't even english..
Time for fucking bed
>>14747775
>need a hardware change (head and turbo) instead of just a tune.
It will probably get much more than that, since Mazda pretty much prides itself on being obsessed with optimizing details (i.e. the engines in the CX-3, CX-5, 3, and Miata are all based on the same architecture but use different parts despite being the "same" 2.0L,)
>>14747800
wait really? how different are we talking?
I assumed Miata vs. others had obvious lat/long changes, but what else?
>>14747538
>new RWD models
What RWD models? The MS3 is gonna be AWD
>>14747712
because engine agreements.
aka subaru gave them the finger
>>14747712
I came out 3 years ago retard
>>14747715
Also forgot the CX-4 being in the way of more "pure" fun cars, but supposedly that'll be sportswagon-y and already has prototypes running around in China
