Well those two cars have a variety of options engine wise.. I've never liked mustangs and that's because all I see are lame v6 convertible mustangs. If it's at least got the 5.0 in it, it's something. Idk what to say about the charger. Year?

>>14730140
Unless you're gonna go balls to the wall racing and modding, you're not gonna notice a huge difference between the 3 just driving them around. I'd say the best handling of the three would be the camaro, but the mustang would be a close second. The challenger is a land barge but it has the power to get up and go. And it's probably got the best ride of the 3. Don't let someone make the decision for you though. Go try all 3 and then make a choice.

>>14730486
Also don't get a s197 3 valve. I have one and I would trade for a 5.0 or a camaro ss in a heartbeat. It has potential but it's gonna take more money to get to the levels of the other ones.

File: 20160326_170037.jpg (742 KB, 1594x897) Image search: [Google]

742 KB, 1594x897

>>14730140
Charger is fast no? I have a 5.0 mustang and I think it looks good. This is the only mustang I've never liked look wise.

Also get a manual don't be a pleb.

>>14730140
Get the mustang, support America.
Charger is assembled in Canada.
Mustang is in America
Make America great again

>>14730443
One of the things I don't like about the mustangs is that they are very very common. You can't go anywhere without seeing one, and most of them look the same. Chargers are common too, but not as much. Im talking about models 2008 and up. I'd get a 5.0 without thinking about it but they are a little more expensive.

>>14730140
Challenger
370z
Maxima

>>14730512
No manual Chargers, only Challengers.

I love challengers and thats the one I really want but they are a little bit more expensive so I'm not even considering it