1000HP/L in 1983
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto
You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto
DAILY REMINDER
>>14689855
>couldn't finish a race because it blew up so much.
Junk goes in all fields
>>14689855
What is it?
>>14689872
Never mind i see the BMW Logo
>>14689872
A super shitty bmw engine that exploded upon start up.
>>14689881
it ran 800-900 hp reliably. It's a 1.5l 4cyl from 33 years ago.
>>14690003
>it ran 800-900 hp reliably
No it didnt. Go read about its career.
>>14690017
It would have been perfectly reliable if the owner did the correct preventative maintenance, it has nothing to do with the engine, was just operator error
200mph with N/A in 1970
>>14690017
I did, and the engine actually did blow up after 2 laps when running 1500hp at full boost. 800 hp was the "reliable" number that lasted the whole race.
>>14690042
>preventative maintenance
>on an F1 car
whew lad
>>14690066
Such a glorious and outrageous car, makes me want to fuck the environment as hard as I can
>>14690694
Even after to 800hp there were more DNFs than not.
>>14689855
>le hp/l may may
>>14690066
http://www.supercars.net/cars/1456.html
>top speed ~230 kph / 142.9 mph
>>14690066
>tfw we never had Cammers and Hemis duking it out on the oval
>tfw we never saw Superbirds, Daytonas, and bewinged Talladegas and Cyclones running 200+mph side by side
>>14690066
God bless.
>>14689855
How is this litteraly possible?
What mods allow a 1.5litre to produce 1500hp?
>>14692456
Yurop. Fuck displacement.
>>14692456
Using methanol as fuel, fucktons of boost, no regards for longevity would come to mind.
Not sure how that engine did it, these are just general ideas.
>>14692456
Just some overnight parts from Japan. And a stage 1 remap.
>>14692490
Cool thanks. I know very little about performance engines.
>>14692456
>>14692490
It wasn't even methanol they were using in those f1 engines. Super toxic exotic fuel blends, you should look at pit crews from the era. Spacesuits almost.
>>14690066
bullshit
>>14692530
the NASCAR spec ones could do it since they made around 800hp
the street ones couldnt come close
not all that impressive since European race cars were hitting 200+ in the 30s with less horsepower
pic related went 226mph
>>14692530
200mph was easy
>>14692518
delicious low compression
>>14692653
Yeah I'm wondering, how and why did they do that? Do you need need low compression ratios for large induction pressures?
>>14692663
Basically, yes, to prevent detonation.
>>14692663
Forced induction is just compressing air before it enters the engine. Compression means heat, and too much of it means detonation - which means explodey engines.
They do it by simply using domed pistons and big cilinder heads.
>>14689855
>1200 hp/l in 1964
>10,000 hp out of a engine package that easily fits into a car
>creates 1100 lb ft of downforce from the exhaust manifolds alone
No wonder Hitler committed suicide.
>>14692693
>implying just because the engine was originally designed in 1964 that modern drag engines have anything to do with the engineering that went into the original engines
They share the dimensions, that's about it.
>>14692405
That is based on a full factory 440 4 barrel. The engine that did the deed in the Daytona was a Hemi Dual quad with race exhaust, full forged balanced internals and a fat cam. With 3.23 gears and the 4 speed (with gear 4 set below direct drive as available in the Scat Pack/RTS) factory Hemi cars could get to nearly 180 before running out of steam. Source: http://www.allpar.com/model/superbird.html
>>14692530
See the source above. There are many others available to view as well. I thought it was well known the Charger Daytona was the first to break 200 on the circle. Actually, they said it could have been faster if they could have removed the wind but that caused too much rear end lift because lol no diffuser on the rear
>>14692686
Dished. They used dished pistons to lower the CR. Couple that with a raised deck block and a short stroke crank (which is obvious from the displacement and RPM ratings) and there you go.
>>14692693
Hemi stronk.
>>14692727
Very true, but you think that BMW 4 banger shared anything with a contemporary BMW 4 minus maybe pulleys?
>>14689855
it blew more often than you when you are watching interracial tranny porn
>>14689855
>That compressor housing
>>14692518
>2xKKK
>>14690042
thats what rotary-fags say
>>14693090
probably because it's true
>>14693090
umm......thats the joke
>>14693168
>>14692561
220mph with drum brakes
wew lad
![[clears throat].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/n0fVwD0.jpg "[clears throat].jpg")
>>14693155
>8 engine rebuilds
>>14690066
Set the first 200 MPH record
>>14693253
in NASCAR*
about 44 years late to hit the 1st 200mph record
200mph in 1970
431kmph in 1937
>>14692456
for max hp they sealed off the waste gates
>>14692456
before the fuel consumption limits got too harsh they would run rich to help keep things cool
a big problem of the early stuff was inaccurate fuel metering
and it was safer to run rich than lean
>>14692456
Unlike most engines which are made out of affordable parts and design to last 100,000+ miles, these are made out of the most expensive shit you can buy, and are designed to make it til the end of the race and blow up. The tolerances are so tiny you couldn't start it up if it was 10 degrees Celsius outside.
