Is this the sexiest car ever created? Why the fuck isn't /o/ talking about the new Alfa Romeo Giulia more?
>starting at under $40k
>manual transmission
>RWD and AWD options
>theres a fucking 505 HP model available, with dat Italian twin-turbo V6 sound
>went around the Nurbürgring in 7 minutes and 39 seconds
Help guys, I'm in love with this thing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttktBQHOndg
looks like an offbrand BMW
manual is outdated garbage
who cares about benchracer shit
muh dick
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVLYEArftes
They ditched the manual though.
Also i'd rather get the 340i or m3 competition package
>>14684161
>manual is outdated garbage
>I stalled once and got scared
Under 40K gets you the 2wd 6 cylinder. Probably FWD too. And no leather.
>went around the Nurbürgring in 7 minutes and 39 seconds
And had multiple mechanical failures immediately after. Alfa, not even once.
>>14684373
Whoops, 4cyclinder.
>>14684374
> making up things because you're butthurt
>>14684378
It only has to said 3 or more times on the internet. Then it becomes a factoid, which other's think means fact.
Saw it in person, looks beautiful.
>>14684376
RWD/AWD only. 2l turbo with 200bhp and 8 speed auto is most basic petrol option. nothing to be sneezed at. just try to be less assblasted and retarded all the time and embrace the italian automobile.
>>14684362
They actually ditched the manual? Seriously?
>Italian cars
>Reliable
I'm glad they put MUH PASSION into it, but they didn't get their shitty reputation for no reason.
>>14684726
>drives a shitbox
>>14684133
>twin-turbo V6
no thanks, AMG exists.
>>14684133
so how many HP has the < 40k model?
>>14684988
280
>>14685151
a 340i with over 320 HP starts at 46k € so I wouldn't call that cheap.
You're acting like v6 and twin turbo chargers are a good thing. Even bmw managed to put a v8 in the m3 for a little while.
>>14684611
>anyone being assblasted by a 200hp car
A fucking Honda Accord and Ford Fusion make more power than that.
>>14684161
>manual is outdated garbage
If you don't like changing gears. Drive an electric and do us a favor
>>14684133
No this is the sexist car ever made
Because you can get the godmachine that is the 640hp 2017 Camaro ZL1.
>>14684373
Why would they make a FWD version of an RWD car?
>>14685514
The new Camaro is fucking ugly, and yes, that matters
>>14684133
>Is this the sexiest car ever created? Why the fuck isn't /o/ talking about the new Alfa Romeo Giulia more?
I think you mean the Maserati Granturismo MC
>>14684133
>>14685590
Also, I think you could mean the Aston Martin Vanquish
>>14684133
rumors are that the 4 cyl won't have a manual... and that's the only one i can come close to affording
>>14684635
The top end model will have a manual available but the base models will be auto only.
>>14684374
Don't know about failures but the Alfa that ran the lap in 7:39 was a stripped, lightened test mule with hand-cut racing slicks that are only track legal.
The biggest issues Alfa is facing now is with the safety, it is failing crash tests badly and they may have to rebuild the suspension which will hurt performance badly.
>>14685221
Pretty sure he means usd. 46k € is about 51k usd, so it is cheaper by a margin
>>14685663
just woke up pardon my shitty sentence building
>>14685590
>>14685595
Pretty sure you mean the AMG GT
>>14685663
>The biggest issues Alfa is facing now is with the safety, it is failing crash tests badly and they may have to rebuild the suspension which will hurt performance badly.
Source of this bullshit?
>>14686234
http://www.autoblog.com/2016/02/10/alfa-romeo-giulia-needs-help-fedeli/
http://europe.autonews.com/article/20160205/ANE/160209894/former-ferrari-chief-engineer-returns-to-fiat-chrysler
>>14686264
>UPDATE: An Alfa Romeo US spokesman responded to this article with the following statement: The safety concerns expressed in the story are false.
It's like you can't read.
>>14686268
True, that`s a recent update though. I read the same article 2 weeks ago.
Anyway it doesn`t change the fact that the claimed lap time is too dodgy as the record setting car is a development prototype and there is no proof or video of the lap, just a claim.
well good luck Alfa, I want to see some comparison reviews.
>>14684726
Doesn't help that Alfa is owned by FCA. But goddamn is this car sexy
>>14685514
That's a great car, but
>two door, with nonexistent back seats
>ugly
>makes you look like a teenager
>probably quite a bit worse of an interior than the Alfa
The CTS-V is a better option
>>14686305
Stay ass blasted you faggot bmw fangirl
>>14686459
Not even mad, at least BMW doesn`t have to cheat or set up fairy tales to beat its competition.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6VrhW6J4Bs
>>14684161
>manual is outdated garbage
Stop driving autocuck.
>>14686542
> it's a lie!
> there cheating!
> I can't prove it at all but I'm going to claim it anyway bevause I'm ass blasted bmw got btfo!
Roflmao eurocuck
Bmw can't best any of its competition
M4 got btfo by a fucking camaro LOL
>>14686556
The M4 rapes the camaro every day of the week.
>eurocuck
the most pointless insult ever, the Giulia is an European car as well you retard.
>>14684374
Do have a single fact to back that up?
>>14684133
it's ugly
italian cars stopped being beautiful after 156
>>14684133
The front looks nice but the rest of it screams BMW MODERN GERMAN STYLE
>>14685590
>>14685595
>>14685704
>t. underage kids who play gta online
>>14685492
>No this is the sexist car ever made
the sexiest car was already made 40 years ago, everyone pack up and go home.
>>14686742
>>14684133
>pigfat
>shit engine choices
>expensive
> always down on power when compared to the same price level, which are an upper class above, cars
Yeah. Alfa? Not even once. Shits gonna fail hard.
>>14684133
It was, there were at least 5 threads per day when the car was announced.
>>14684611
Only place they gonna sell petrol is to some retarded American that still falls for the Alfa meme. In Europe unless they have a proper diesel engine (which they don't) no one wants them.
>>14686997
That's bs.
I see lots of Mitos and Giuliettas everyday.
>>14684133
>italian electricals
>italian reliability
>european prestige tax
i doubt a single one will be sold in my state. People will either settle for a HSV or completely skip the Giulia and go for an AMG.
>>14686940
10/10
Also
>>14686264
>http://europe.autonews.com/article/20160205/ANE/160209894/former-ferrari-chief-engineer-returns-to-fiat-chrysler
>Luca Ciferri
KEK.
Friendly reminder that when you read an article written by Ciferri, a formal autistic man who has alway been butthurt about this car (read the past totally made up articles), you have to close the tab in your browser and go to another website.
>>14686666
Quads of truth ere.
Butthurted bimmers everywhere, mad on their premium sports engines with 3 cylinders.
STAY VERY MAD
>pic related best looking car
>then Alfa's cause Alfa.
>>14686997
>unless they have a proper diesel engine (which they don't)
>(which they don't)
2.2 jtdm with 150, 180 and 210 hp confirmed.
Go away and take your butthurt with you, degenerate filthy nigger.
>>14684133
ive never seen an actual alfa romeo out on the streets in the US
>>14687403
They haven't been sold in the US for a long time.
>>14686988
>pigfat
>1,374 kg / 3,029 lb
>>14687396
>it's all bout them numbers
>but who gives a damn about reliability
typical italian thinking
>>14684133
>front
REEEEEEEE imma frog
>everything behind the front fender
sick c class bmw breh
>>14687461
>bitches about fca diesel engines not being decent
>damage control based on fiat meme
HELLO M8, I'M A BMW N47 DIESEL ENGINE AND THIS IS JACKASS
>>14687424
the 4c has been for sale for a while now. actually i remember seeing a couple old alfas from the 80s every once in a while but their super rare here
>>14687395
nothing quite like Italian engineering combined with Slavic quality control and material selection
>>14687531
I think the 4C was the first Alfa to be for sale in the US since the 80s.
The Giulia replaces the 159, which I don't think the US ever got.
>>14687073
Diesel ones.
>>14687396
Let's see, any other car that they aim to compete with does the same and even more HP with 2.0 blocks and some with even a smaller size engine.
Explain me where in a world where most countries tax the cars by engine size will a 2.2 be competitive?
And this is even forfeiting the argument that it's retarded and outdated to use a 2.2 to extract that kind of horsepower.
Now, you take your Alfa muh passion butthurt out of here.
>>14687436
When everyone else is at least 150Kg lighter, yes pigfat.
>>14687768
>Diesel ones.
Well, probably some Giuliettas but the vast majority of Mitos I see are petrol.
>>14687461
Fiat diesels are reliable, you double nigger.
>>14687523
>>14687862
goddamn stop being so butthurt you shills
>>14687768
do list all modern sports sedans weighting 1224kg or less
>>14687768
>When everyone else is at least 150Kg lighter, yes pigfat.
How fucked in the head are you?
Competitors Diesel sedans like C Class, 3 Series and A4 weights 1500 to 1700+ kg with 2/2.2 diesel engines.
>>14684133
Like with every other Alfa ever, the grille is actually fucking disgusting.
>>14689048
Normally I would agree with you, but this is the first Alfa I've ever found good looking. The ugly grill actually looks kind of nice, at least in a unique way. And the rest of the car is absolutely fantastic
>>14687856
Sales numbers say otherwise. 1.3jtd are the gross.
>>14687862
No they're not. Furthermore, for the power levels they have, they're a disgrace. If they had power on par with the competition well, meh. Failure rate could be said to be somewhat on the ballpark. Problem is, they've got pretty much the same failure, while with lower power which is worse by itself.
>>14687885
Pretty much all the cars the muh passion turd wants to compete with.
>>14688230
lel you're the one fucked in the head if you're thinking the Alfa is a competitor to any of those brands
btw, the Audi isn't even a competitor to the 3 series or the Merc. A rebadged VW has no pedigree.
>>14684133
It looks like every other average european saloon on sale today. A huge step backwards from pic related
>>14689144
Fucking this. The 159's front still looks sexy as hell.
>>14689111
>Pretty much all the cars the muh passion turd wants to compete with.
nice job avoiding the question
>>14686613
Yeah, the M4 is shit. BMW didn't include the thing they made their name on, tuning.
It drives like a (fast) dog, the steering is garbage, the brakes are shit, it sounds awful, it's inexplicably almost 2 tons, and it makes the Camaro look tastefully styled.
When the Camaro is lighter, has better steering, has better brakes, and is better handling than BMW's E30 M3 successor, people at BMW should be fired.
>>14689668
The M4 is 130lbs lighter than the 2016 Camaro
The M4 is praised by its excellent precise steering and reponsiveness as it's better than the competition
The camaro is the ugliest muscle car ever produced
I agree on the sound, the M4 sounds disappointing
The M4 Competition package was released recently and there are no comparison reviews of it yet
And at last:
There is no Camaro, Mustang, Charger or Challenger that can touch the M4 GTS. Sure it costs twice the price of a Camaro but it's still a BMW M4.
The sexiest car ever made is the mk4 supra
>>14684611
>Dat face
Looks like an even angrier Squidward
>>14689756
> M4 is praised for its precise and responsive steering
Lol and it totally isn't criticized for total lack of feedback
>>14688516
This should be a meme
Inb4 it is
sexiest?