Ballshit thread
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto
You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto
Literally bullshit thread
>"new model"
>slightly heavier
>5hp/5 torque gain
Toyota scamming people left and right on this one, man..
Fuck the whole company of Nissan and their entire "stick an unreliable CVT into everything!" plan.
>>14682621
Welp, it was a good thread while it lasted.
>>14682612
hehehe, got more horsepower and better mpg, see no problems hehehe
>>14682612
Oh boy an original /o/ thread
Fuckdamnit, Suzuki. You had to make the last happy hot hatch angry.
>>14682656
hehehehehehhehhe XD
>>14682669
>last happy hot hatch
lies. The Fiat Abarth still exists
>>14682691
XD ruh roh, getting good mileage and power, using less gas and cheaper gas lmao hehehe
>>14682705
Oh damn, how could I forget?
>>14682612
>ballshit
That's what happens when I lean back and squeeze one out.
>hey guise, let's up the compression on our engines
>yeah, we totally should give it a name
>sure, something about how we care about the environment and the ozone layer
Highest compression gasoline engines ever available on the market by a LOOOONG margin
Better real life economy than shitty downsized turbo engines which are designed to look good in manufacturer testing and manufacturer testing only.
>>14683444
>Highest compression gasoline engines ever available on the market by a LOOOONG margin
Maybe there's a reason for that? High comp motorcycle engines have been around for ages.
I still have yet to see any long term (4+) years on these skyactive engines. I have visions of premature wear and replacements every 100k miles, which isn't very "green".
>>14683471
You're dumb
>>14683444
>no power, taking into account the displacement
>no torques compared to turbocharged engines
>worse empeegees than turbocharged engines
Yeah, I think I'll keep my turbos.
>>14683498
enjoy your 75hp turbo diesels, eurocuck
>>14683514
b-but muh torks
>>14683514
85hp, excuse me.
Still more torks and better empeegees.
Also,
>1.5 Mazda 3
>100hp from a 1.5 while being pigfat bloated
kek
>>14683444>
>change header
Knock knock
>add turbo
Knock knock
>do anything related to performance
Knock knock
Mazda the no zoom zoom brand.
>ITT
>Autistic faggots don't understand normal cars
You all need to get out more.
>>14683541
They are purely economy engines and not orientated for performance in any way
I'm sorry some people on /o/ have trouble understanding this. Go back to getting 8mpg in your big block caddy that is slower than the lowest powered mazdas currently available :^)
>>14683557
Then why are you bragging about those engines having an higher compression and being N/A when turbocharged engines are way more efficient and powerful?
>>14683576
>>14683576
> more efficient
40mpg /real world/ without autistic hypermilling garbage tyvm, let's see a turbo gas engine do that
> less powerful
yeah but an evo only gets 12mpg in the city :^)
>>14683587
>look at me, I'm just being different for the sake of it
>>14683591
Check the 0.9 twin air. It's also more powerful and more torks.
>>14683604
> 85hp
> fiatshit reliability
LOL fuck off eurocuck
>>14683604
Are you smoking crack?
107tq is not greater than 185tq
>>14683619
Also 12 seconds to 100kmh oh my lord
It probably gets 15mpg trying to keep up with traffic roflmao
>>14683604
>using the 0.9 twinair as an example of a good engine in any regard
>>14683619
It's actually 105hp. Learn to google.
>>14683624
>145Nm from a 0.9
>150Nm from a 1.5
But hey, we can always compare the 1.5 skyactiv to the 1.4 multi air, but that would too humiliating.
>>14683667
It's a reliable and efficient engine, don't know what you're on about.
>>14683681
Here in freedom land. We have a 2.0 and 2.5
Fuck off trying to talk shit with a small engine only offered in your third world country.
>>14683681
Google says 85hp. We can also compare to the 270hp skyactiv engine that also gets 40mpg without the slightest bit of effort?
> fiat turbo engine
> reliable
Enough with the buyers remorse, eurocuck
>>14683695
The 1.5 is the only version available in the first world.
>>14683708
>Google says 85hp.
Learn to use it, then.
>We can also compare to the 270hp skyactiv engine that also gets 40mpg without the slightest bit of effort?
kek, sure
>Enough with the buyers remorse, eurocuck
kek, this coming from a a guy who's shilling the brand that used to shove wankels on the market.
Enjoy your rust, bby.
>>14683731
>The 1.5 is the only version available in the first world.
no it's not
>>14683740
Yes, it is.
>>14683731
>270hp skyactiv engine
You mean the one that dyno's at less than 200hp. I'm sure the MPG figures aren't exaggerated as hell as well...
>>14683752
No it's not.
>>14682669
I legit thought that was a Kia Soul at first glance.
>>14683444
>Better real life economy than shitty downsized turbo engines
Source?
>>14683918
test seems comparable
http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-reviews/mazda/mazda-3-20-165ps-sport-nav-2014-review/
38.3mpg
http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-reviews/long-term-tests/fiat/fiat-panda-09-twinair-2013-long-term-test-review/
also 38mpg
but in a much smaller car.
>>14682612
>>14683999
hi moose, took you look enough to post this
>>14683966
bump
>>14683731
Don't you have refugees to kowtow to?
