Anyone have any experience with the CTS (non V)? I'd rather have a V of course but can't spend $45k on one, and I only want the wagon. I unfortunately have to get some kind of practical car towards the end of this year, chances are it's either going to be this or an early Quattroporte
>>14680404
I look forward to driving mine every day.
>>14680404
As some one who supposedly works on Maseratis, you should know already why that's a bad idea.
Those CTS are pretty nice though, the 3.6 is a good motor
Why ask /o/? You should know better
get a lexus
>>14680500
How many miles have you put on it?
>>14680522
QPs are great cars, I would just be sacrificing a weekend every 2-3 months to keep it going
>>14680534
Sportcross is the only option and they don't do anything for me
>>14680590
how about an ss
>>14680590
why not get a Magnum SRT8? or a mercedes E500 or E550 wagon? or BMW 5 series?
>>14680404
Why would you buy a cts wagon when you could get an E-class wagon for only slightly more money?
>>14680634
The CTS will be way more reliable.
>>14680640
So would a corolla but it's not a better car
>>14680604
No wagons in the US
>>14680620
All of those (and Audi Allroads I was looking at too) would end up costing me more money and time to keep going than a QP, which I already know inside and out, have the scanner for, etc.
>>14680640
recent mercedes are actually pretty good.
pic related, consumer reports e class reliability
>>14680667
forgot pic
>>14680648
and here's the consumer reports data for the cts
>>14680404
I've got a V coupe, so I dunno how helpful my advice is. But if I had to get the non V I would be looking at other cars. For practicality a VW gti comes to mind.
>>14680590
'bout 70k
