>RWD
>V6
>Manual comes standard
>Good power-to-weight ratio
>Can be had for under $10k
Is there a catch to these things? Because they look really good on paper.
>>14603345
>Chrysler
There's your first problem.
>Mercedes
Shit icing on the shitcake.
>>14603345
>V6
>slow as fucc
Sounds like a good idea OP go for it!1
>>14603345
Peugeot 406 was all the above.
rwd, v6, manual, good watts/kg and <10k now.
>>14603345
It is retarded sibling of mercedes slk. worse in every way.
You really have to consider slk as godmachine to find crossfire even acceptable.
>>14603459
>rwd 406
get your shit together
>shit peeling interior
>shitty v6
>somewhat hefty but not terribly over weight
So can this be considered like a slow 350z?
Didnt this follow the old trope of forcing slushboxes on people who wanted the good motor?
>>14603345
They got very poor reviews. Apparently they ride like arse and don't have the handling to justify it. Then again, trouble with the press is that you never know who's paying em.
>literally poopdog
>>14605656
Clarkson pls go
>>14605674
once you see it
>>14603345
>RWD
>V6
>Manual comes standard
>Can be had under 10k
>Far more power
>Far more reliable
>No Mercedes parts to repair/replace
>Better gas mileage
>Larger fuel tank
>Doesn't look like a pooping dog
Literally no reason to get a Crossfire
>>14603346
>Chrysler
10/10 transmissions bruh you good
![8444fbf97518eae87b2fe74515ef52f8_large[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/sigm7jy.jpg "8444fbf97518eae87b2fe74515ef52f8_large[1].jpg")
Your arguments are invalid
>>14606770
>automatic only
Blew it
>>14605919
>Doesn't look like a pooping dog
Did you think you could sneak that in without anyone noticing? Same profile as the Crossfire just more bloated
>>14605919
But youre driving a Nissan then and forgoing reliability anyways. Not to mention disgusting V6.
>>14607287
How is Nissan not vastly more reliable than Chrysler
