NA >100hp/liter
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto
You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto
ITT post cars that achieve 100 hp per liter or better with a NA engine.
Leave it to S2K owners to come up with some useless metric to validate themselves
>>14178841
>cars
lol
>>14178863
Shut your mouth or I'll kick your teeth down your throat and I'll shut it for you
>>14178851
This. Btw bmw broke 100 hp/l with the e36 m3 and mclaren f1. Nobody talks about it because *surprise* nobody cares.
4.5L/464hp
k
1.3/255
>>14178922
>any flagship 90's jap sports car
>actually making advertised power numbers
top kek
Nearly 200hp in a 1L engine.
If this mattered car companies would be strapping motorcycle engines together, but it doesn't, so they don't.
2.0/200
>>14178918
Turbo... fucktard
>>14178942
>strapping motorcycle engines together
Mmm
Funny that the Mustang now makes this list.
4.0/406
SPEED SIX
That moment when you realize this isn't that impressive of a metric to go by...
>>14178876
>cage cucks are this mad
>>14178978
>S54
>Turbo
You're the fucktard, lad. BMW didn't start turbo-ing M3s until BMW became shit.
>>14178978
>E46 M3
>turbo
>>14179009
Nobody's mad, go back to your circlejerk
>>14178978
>any M3 pre-E92
>turbo
Pick one moron.
>>14178978
thats not turbo faggot
>>14178979
Well fuck me, it's a thing.
1.8L/192hp
just made it
>>14179047
>anime sticker
>some transformer-like shit badge
>>14178841
S2000s are such a pain to drive, impressive on paper shit in real life.
>>14179055
>rotaryfags trying this hard
>The Renesis won International Engine of the Year and Best New Engine awards 2003 [6] and also holds the "2.5 to 3 liter" (note that the engine is designated as a 1.3 liter by Mazda) size award [7] for 2003 and 2004, where it is considered a 2.6 L engine
> In several countries where a car tax is based on cylinder displacement, rotary engines are taxed according to this displacement equivalency rule. You pay the same tax for a 2,6L piston engine as for a 1,3L rotary engine.
>>14178922
That's turbo.
>>14178978
Hope you meant to respond to >>14178922.
>>14179074
It's not like this site is Japanese or anything.
>>14179110
Did anyone comment on your sticker? Kinda ugly way to hide the scratch.
>>14179050
We should do it more
Integra type r, cant be arsed to look up the #'s atm
>>14179118
Hide? I find it just draws the eye to it, and the fact the sticker isn't big enough to actually cover it.
>>14179127
Sex
>>14179135
195hp 1.8L.
>>14179093
that makes zero sense. a rotary that displaces less fuel and air somehow gets a higher than one multiple? you may as well tax by horsepower.
>>14179172
magic
>>14178933
You're right. They actually make much more than advertised.
>>14179034
sure is mad in here
Na miata
Altezza RS200. Yamaha BEAMS engine, 2.0 207hp.
Only for Japs though
>>14179074
>he doesn't recognise a jdm-tyte altezza
smuganimeface.png
>>14179219
Haha no
Nobody cares.
>>14179273
E46 a shit, Clownshoe a best
>>14178889
no its because bmw sucks
>>14179219
lmao fuck off you deluded queer
>>14179286
Why do these types of posts always have terrible grammar? Is there some horde of 15 year old kids who hate BMW on here or are you just one shitposter?
>>14179295
I assume this is you too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asQOhfaaLJE
>>14179074
mfw when it's the standard altezza badge and this faggot is bitching about anime on a fucking weeaboo anime image board
>>14179093
it's a 1.3l engine but because govts established car tax rules based on engine displacement and didn't consider rotaries, it is listed in logbooks as 2.6l
it's a 1.3l bruv, deal wid it
>>14178841
Still has like 180 lb-ft of torque lol. Who gives AF
>>14179093
It's 1.7l in Ireland faggot how about that
>>14179074
hahahhahahahahahahaha
>>14179295
Do you not have anything better to do?
>>14178851
>>14178863
>>14178876
>>14178889
>>14178942
>>14178978
>>14179009
>>14179074
>>14179092
>>14179218
>>14179273
>>14179295
>>14179286
>>14179572
>2016
>not positively contributing to threads and proving /o/ is still the most cancerous board
HP per liter is a meaningless number.
what really matters is power to weight
![bugatti-veyron-2012-9537[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/B4VrY2X.jpg "bugatti-veyron-2012-9537[1].jpg")
8.0L/1000HP
>>14180188
oops, turbo'd, nvm.
100hp/litre, aim higher
265hp/l reporting for duty
>>14179909
>HP per liter is a meaningless number.
>what really matters is power to weight
comedy gold
tell this to anybody who works with F1 cars or any displacment limitited series.
or to people in europe, where displacement is taxed as fuck
>>14180729
What do you think they do in F1? They make the car have the most power possible with whatever engine size rules they have to work with. One team doesn't just go smaller and go "MUH HP/L" when they come last every race.
>>14178933
They usually make more than advertised. The Toyota Chaser was rated at the usual 276 crank but dyno'd 270-300 at the wheels depending in the dyno.
>>14180729
>talk about performance cars
>to people in Europe
Sure, why not ask them about their favorite guns, baseball players, and barbecue recipes too
>>14179794
Essentially this
>>14178851
Lets continue.
My car achieves 1000cc/liter. That's on par with the $200000000 supercars.
>>14180774
My car is supposed to have a 2000cc engine but it's actually 1998cc
This is blatant false advertisement. Who do I sue
>>14180789
But that means it makes more hp/l bro
>>14178942
>bringing in motorcycles
>but not the superior engine type
Well over 200hp/l with these
>>14180754
>performance cars
>america
you mean undrivable cars with one of 500 derivatives of small block, 3800, 2 I4-s welded together, ecoboost shoved down everybodys thorat?
or cars with one of these custom made 1500hp "works of art" that can turn into frag grenade at any moment?
>>14181010
>>14181010
Who needs motorcycles?
https://youtu.be/EmnsXTMLzCE
>>14181017
While he is wrong, owning a sports car of any kind is actually pretty damn cheap here.
