Had a lady yell at me how terrible Nissan is because Chrysler wouldn't sell her a car.
>u wot?
2 questions. Is that your GTR? Who are you?
I'm a newfag sorry.
>>14069020
not op but I can tell you right off the bat that isn't his gtr. Lurk for at least a month before posting
>>14069176
>>14069020
actually maybe it is but probably not
Trust fund kid from school get Nismo 370z
"wow dude, sweet ride"
look inside,
"dude, its automatic..."
kid gets quiet.
>comes in next day with gtr
just
>>14069185
>things that never happened
>>14069185
e/b/in
Fuck it
R34 thread
>>14069353
>muh RB
>muh straight 6 twin turbo 300hp engine
>>14069359
you do realise that Japan had a 280ps power limit right
you are not actually rertarded... right?
>>14069371
No, the manufacturers self imposed the 'limit' and by the mid 90s most were lying out of their ass about it.
>>14069371
>muh weabooism
>muh underpowered 6cyl twin turbo
weebs on suicide watch
>>14069185
>still automatic
>>14069020
Wish it was but no.
>>14069385
>R34 GT-R
>underpowered
Still makes more than your mom's crossover.
![2016-bmw-x6m-29-1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/E3mX1R6.jpg "2016-bmw-x6m-29-1[1].jpg")
>>14069427
>imblyign
>>14069427
>6 cylinder TWIN TURBO
>only 300hp
>>14069441
>suv
Sure pal, sure.
>>14069451
Isn't it pretty much confirmed that the rated hp was bullshit or nah?
>>14069451
>tfw even dodge caravans come with 300hp now
What a time to be alive
>>14069468
confirmed where
>>14069470
I don't know, I'm just parroting, but based on the actual performance of the car and the rumors I'm lead to believe it's true.
>>14069371
>>14069451
>>14069380
It was rated at 276HP but actually makes 321 HP (at the wheels) stock. They are pretty darn fast.
>>14069468
Supposedly yeah, both the supra and gtr made more power than the 270hp or whatever the gentleman's agreement was
I think the only one that actually stayed true to it was honda with nsx
>>14069451
>at the wheels
>>14069470
Here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMPTMkNRKbg
>inb4 exhaust
Nismo bits you could have installed at the dealer.
>>14069482
>>14069487
321hp out of a 6cyl twin turbo? damn that's really amazing
if it were '80s
>>14069490
A 375HP car in the late 1990s was pretty good.
>>14069490
302 whp = 355 crank hp. Which isn't all that bad for a 3.0L, TT or not, if you're not being a dyno queen and want a useable powerband, typically a "lower" number like 355 will actually be faster than a 700hp car that finally spools 500rpm from redline.
>>14069504
Wait, I forgot about the AWD, so it's more like 20% loss, so >>14069498 saying 375 crank is right on the money.
>>14069504
The RB26 is, you guessed it, 2.6L.
>>14069490
Your daily makes the same power out of 5.9 liters.
>>14069561
with an engine design from the '70s
>>14069353
>dat aerodynamically designed b pillar
so much mad ITT
