Developed in Ohio
4WD
Auto
Hybrid
3800 lb
No ring time
tagged for $150,000
>just...
>>14063451
inb4 still faster and more reliable than the corvette
soichiro's ghost is angry
Got a problem with Ohio, Bro?
>>14063458
Alphonse take a fucking break already you gay furry fuck
>modern honda
People forget that NSX is about implementing new ideas, not muh MR naturally aspirated overpriced sports car, hence the name NSX.
>The first-generation prototype debuted in 1989 at the Chicago Auto Show under the developmental code name NS-X, which represented "New", "Sportscar" and "eXperimental".
Nonetheless, it's still fucking ugly and pigfat (apparently heavier than a GT-R). Oh and it's designed by a Californian dyke.
>>14063458
I hate to say it but id rather buy a corvette than this cuckmobile
>>14063502
>everyone who makes fun of the cuckvette is Alphonse
so obsessed with that faggot kek
>>14063510
the first NSX was pigfat, the only lightweight models were the Type Rs
>>14063535
>the first NSX was pigfat, the only lightweight models were the Type Rs
At least it was nice looking (looked like a Ferrari knock off but still) meanwhile the new NSX is not even that.
>>14063458
Doubtful it's also Americant
>>14063458
I'd take a base model Corvette over it honestly.
Honda is shit now, rip.
>>14063510
>People forget that NSX is about implementing new ideas, not muh MR naturally aspirated overpriced sports car, hence the name NSX.
>selling people a mass produced prototype and thinking thats ok
>>14063490
SPINNING
P
I
N
N
I
N
G
>>14063451
>it's literally just a 918 except 200lbs heavier, 315hp slower, and far, far uglier
>>14063939
Eh. It's not fair to call it a not-as-good 918 when it's more of a somewhat-better mid-engined hybrid Accord. Sounds pretty appealing, I know.
>>14063535
No the type Rs weren't the lightweights the ZEROs were. Type Rs had mild weight savings and better suspensions than a base, but the NSX type S ZERO I believe was the lightest.
>>14063939
and 10 times cheaper
>>14064024
the type S zero is heavier, type S zero are Type R's with softer suspension iirc
>>14064024
Zeros were literally Type Rs but Honda couldn't name it Type R because it didn't have enough new ideas to bear the Type R badge, better research your shit before you spout it.
>>14063451
I think a Type R that removes the 4WD and some battery to lighten the weight will be a good car.
Is this the First Japanese super-car built outside Japan and inside the US?
That alone makes this a rare oddity
Even if its a disappointment i like that much<3
>>14063559
yep. u seen f1? their engines for mclaren were utter garbage
>>14063559
Yeah that new civic that is faster than Porsche's and vettes are complete shit, who wants to go that fast for 35k
>>14063451
Find it fucking hilarious both Nissan and Honda are now fucking with the one thing that made their flagship sports cars great, the Price. The old NSX and GTR aren't cheap, but they were affordable enough that the average person could get their hands on one without a huge issue, but now they're 6 figure super cars and have pretty much destroyed the heritage their predecessors built up.
>>14065285
>implying the new NSX isnt the same as its predecessor
>>14063451
still would buy
Literally the highest amount of tech possible at a reasonable price.
>>14065296
The 90s NSX was like 40k base, that's over 100k cheaper than the new one
>>14065311
>highest amount of tech
Gotta have the most tech
>>14065315
>40k base
kek you are clueless, they were like 70k or more, type R's were 150k and you were invited y honda to buy one
>>14063451
isn't this the car from gta 5?
>>14065408
50k for a mid range in 1992 or 1993. Today's money, that'd be about the price of a G37xS. Not terrible, but not an NSX-R either.
>>14065285
old GTRs are kind of cheap, just not in the states.
>>14065422
the msrp was like 65k, add dealership markup and other bullshit
http://www.nsxprime.com/forum/showthread.php/5478-Original-Sticker-Price-for-91NSX
>>14065311
>>14065430
>>14065315
>newfags can't into inflation
$65k in 1991 is easily $110k in 2015. The price hasn't changed that much, given the amount of tech the car has.
You know you could get a new Corvette in the 60s for like $4k right? I bet you think Chevy is really screwing people over these days, charging $50k for a $4k car.
>>14065413
Hory shet! Rockstar could sue Hondurr for plagiarism. (Usually it is the other way around)
i wonder how badly they are going to fuck up the s2k
