>>13969035
They're W-body cars, so they're pretty bulletproof. The chassis debuted in 1988 so by 2006, just about all problems were solved. The LaCrosse came with either the bulletproof 3.8L 3800 series 3 V6, or the LY7 3.6L DOHC V6.
Either way a good, reliable buy.

Don't fucking buy it. You're going to run into little stupid fucking problems that are going to make the car undrivable.
Stupid shit man. Stupid shit.
Stray away.

>>13969102
Like what? The only problem W-body cars are known for are blowing transmissions on models with the supercharged V6 or the 5.3L V8, neither of which that LaCrosse has

>>13969119

I'm talking about climate control problems and shorts.
Which I've had my fucking experience with, with W-bodies.

>>13969128
I've had a few W-bodies myself (both from the 1990's) and the only electrical problem I had was when the turn signal switch went. The signals workedd, but in order to get the brake lights to work, I had to pull back slightly on the turn signal stalk. Was apparently a very common problem on gen 1 and gen 1.5 W-body cars

File: 1434809893294.jpg (26 KB, 339x425) Image search: [Google]

26 KB, 339x425

>>13969076
thanks a bunch fellas. i just might get this buick

>>13969261
If you buy it you're fucking retarded
>poor gas mileage
>no power
>handles so poorly its actually a safety hazard
also extremely difficult to work on, but you're probably that guy who just takes it to a mechanic anyways

Don't do it, just don't.

Theres a reason the only people you see driving them are senile...

>>13969261
jesus fucking christ OP dont do it.
WHY WOULD YOU EVER SUBMIT YOURSELF TO THAT INFERIOR PIECE OF JUNK?
>>13970295
This. all of this.

>>13970295
>>13970373

Then how come /o/ loves its predeccesors so much?

>>13972491
Because those faggots have no clue what they're talking about and have no experience with W-body cars. W-body cars are easy to service, with the exception of cars with the 3.4L DOHC V6 or the 5.3L V8