Do you like Cadillac?
Why or why not?
>>13957070
I'm not a basketball American
Yes. They were shit, but now they're less shit.
I like their vertical lights. They leave trails in my eyes at night when I move them rapidly back and forth.
>>13957070
only car i like is that ctsv although not the newer one
>>13957070
I don't want one because I'm a poorfag
I'm not nearly as inherently biased against the brand as, say, Jeep though
>>13957096
You're missing out
>>13957070
I'm indifferent. A CTS-V would be sweet to own for a couple years. Not the coupe tho, I hate how it looks. I hear good things about the ATS, but I just don't see anything special about them. I would get a Lexus or Infiniti before that if I wanted a luxury car without spending Benz money.
I like the older Cadillacs a little better. Back when they were really barges. Nothing like a classic Cadillac. But even the 90s and 2000s cars are so comfy. I wouldn't hate owning a clean mid-2000s DTS.
>>13957151
>You're missing out
No, he isn't. Jeep is pure garbage.
>>13957070
i'm yuro and I'd take a second gen cts-v over any midsize m or amg and i'm not even ashamed of it
3rd gen is alright too but the styling is a bit dubious
rest of brand is shit and i dont even care if the ats-v outhandles the m3, what's the point of an american car if its less then 8cyl (except the gnx cuz only fags hate the gnx)
yes, because big car. I dont want to be all squeezed in my tiny car and sit 4 inches away from my passenger
I like their newfound performance, but they look like shit. Park a none V ATS/CTS next to a German/Japanese competitor and it looks 2002.
>>13957209
if you parked a new cts-v next to an f10 m5 here it would get more attention because f10s are literally everywhere and people buy used diesels for cheap
you'd also get a lot of pussy because rare = expensive in their minds
>>13957070
No. Because it's not a 1998 mazda miata
>>13957202
>and i dont even know if the car is bad per se
It is.
>you could just get a pajero if you actually wanted a decent offroad suv
They don't go off road, that's why they don't have a Pajero.
>>13957279
I see what you did there.
>>13957317
yeah i know i was just entertaining the idea
people here are such dumb fuckers when it comes to cars, body size and ''its a fookin tank'' are genuine qualities and all of the silly fucks driving stuff like an x5/6 or merc equivalent are going to go mad, quite literally, with jealousy if you drive a new escalade by them simply because its bigger and rarer and thus bigger status symbol
>>13957317
>he has never owned/driven a Grand Cherokee
They are nice mang. Until goofy Chrysler stuff starts breaking. And then the same thing breaks again. And again. But that's why we have warranties!
I drive a 2nd Gen CTS. Watch for leaks by the top of the front window in the corners. The weather striping bends there and leaves a gap which leaked on both pillars ion mine. Easy fix is some black caulking
I'm sad they got rid of the laurel wreath around the badge. I think it looked fantastic. It gave the brand a real "pax americana" feeling to it. That mixed with their ultra-modern design language, but I think they're evolving it poorly. I hate the new leaking tear-drop headlights, and the belt-line is still to high on most of the cars.
Beyond that, I don't know. The only ones I'd ever really drive would be the ATS/CTS, but unfortunately so far there has always been a better, faster car at their price ranges.
fast,handles, and has a nice interior.
what's not to like?
>>13957279
I like this guy
I hope your meme catches on my friend.
I just wish they would make a 2016 XLR with the LT1, and then the next year make an XLR-V with the blown LT4. The XLR's were badass when they were C5's with caddy shells, why not make a C7 version.
