Whenever I suggest this car people say it's junk. Why?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=uEAkTbADjys
Because it weighs one and a half tons for something that's the same bodystyle and not even a foot longer than a Miata.
>>13956707
because it's slower than a Saturn Ion.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NytwmMfmHJk
>>13956734
wow, the highest optioned saturn ion against the least optioned z4. I'd like to see that redline pull on the 3.2 or even 3.0 z4. actually, I wouldn't. driving a good car is about so much more than acceleration.
>>13956757
this is why people say it's junk.
>>13956757
the fact that any ion can keep up with a bmw at all is just sad and shows all of us how shit tier bmw really is
>>13956788
sorry they don't just make cars for morons with fast and furious masturbatory fantasies. I enjoy BMWs no matter how fast they drive; the interiors are comfortable and nice, and they look great (unless you have shit taste, and prefer something like the dodge neon srt4 or some shit). Slow and RWD is more fun than fast and FWD any day.
>>13956800
Ever had to take a bumper off?
Lel
>>13956800
How much you wanna bet the Saturn is faster around a track? Especially considering that its direct sister car is a known giant slayer.
Competes with Porsche Boxster. Is some how shit.
Never change o.
http://www.dragtimes.com/video-viewer.php?v=uG4Atd2S7WE
>>13956822
Both those times are wrong
>>13956822
>car with a top speed limiter
>a giant
>>13956850
We had this argument ages ago. The video proof showed there was no limiter.
>>13956837
>Porsche Boxster
>shilling a Porsche that's slower than it's Saturn competitor.
>>13956903
Video of that lap time for the r34? I've never seen it
Also there's no video of the cobalt running that claimed time, only video of cobalt is damn near 9 minutes
Also r33 is slower than the r34 and it did a sub 8 minute run
You're retarded
>>13956734
Damn son, that ad is savage
>>13956822
What is this horse-shit that gets posted all the time?
>>13956919
Actually, the R34 was slower than the R32, nevermind the R33. The R33 was the fastest GTR, with a nurburgring time of just OVER 8 minutes. The under 8 minutes you're getting is from one of the special edition models.
>>13956903
>We had this argument ages ago. The video proof showed there was no limiter.
I know you are fucking stupid, but you honestly cannot be this fucking stupid, considering the fact that the r33 lapped the ring in under 8 minutes, and the r34 is faster than the r33
>>13956955
>considering the fact that the r33 lapped the ring in under 8 minutes, and the r34 is faster than the r33
see:
>>13956945
>>13956822
The cobalt is a soulless piece of crap. It looks like crap, and it has the street cred of crap. It has never been a car run in any meaningful sanctioned racing program. It has 0 pedigree. I have demolished the cobalt SS time and again on road courses in a civic, an even shittier car. It doesn't matter if it managed to run an eight minute time on the ring.
It is a shitbox, now and forever. And it will never be loved unironically.
>>13956968
It's still faster than whatever you drive/the bus. Sounds like you've been pulled on by a couple.
>>13956964
Lel 2.3 z3. Who wants that. I'm talking about the inline 6s. 3.0. 255hp. 230hp ones.
Jesus guys.
Z4 is a great car. Unless you're an autistic bench racer.
>>13956945
>>13956945
Nurburgring times of some no name spastic driving around at his personal limits doesn't mean shit
Check real lap times, r34 is faster than r32 and r33 by along fucking margin (vest motoring tsukuba time attacks Bitch)
> vspec
Half the r33s around pretty much
get the fuck off this board stupid brain dead cunt
>>13956968
>I have demolished the cobalt SS time and again on road courses in a civic, an even shittier car.
No you haven't.
http://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/nh8pj7koumzr
>This isn't even the turbo Cobalt
>>13956707
Probably becuase it was American Made at the time.
