like the title says, which one should i get?
98 ranger has 53k miles, 4 owners, goes for 4 grants.
99 tacoma is 118k miles, 1 owner, sells for 4.8k.
here are their vins:
ranger: http://www.carfax.com/VehicleHistory/p/Report.cfx?partner=SNU_0&vin=1FTYR10C0WUC97605
tacoma: http://www.carfax.com/VehicleHistory/p/Report.cfx?partner=SNU_0&vin=4TANL42N4XZ510253
>>13932793
guys? :(
Obviously go with the ranger
>>13933461
why is the ranger and not the tacoma??
>>13932793
Either one and youll probably do ok. The tacomas a fucking rip off tho
>>13933943
54K miles that's low as fuck my 06 currently has 148000 it had 125000 when I bought it at 7gs
ranger, pic related
>>13933461
Less miles, less money, not TOO much difference in performance
>>13932793
Ranger.
My 2000 Ranger is going well with over 250k miles
>>13932793
>actually buying a ranger
They are turds. I've driven a ton of them.
Tacoma is way nicer and more reliable
>>13934290
Holy dicks, did rust eat away the frame or how does that happen?
>>13934290
Thats a Toyota
>>13934967
People over stressing the frame
/o/ will tell you its rust
>>13934935
>T. never driven a ranger
Go with the ranger OP.
I have one and its nice and gets the job done. Has over 214k miles with no major issues.
Only cost me 1300, though I talked the dude down from 2k.
>>13935008
>won't go into first gear
>clutch master is shit
>interior peels apart.
>auto trans blows up
>shit power
>shit load and towing
>shit 4x4
It's just shit
>>13935059
>No problems there
>Clutch is fine if you aren't terrible at manual
>Interior is fine in mine
>not buying the stick version
>expecting a small pickup to be a sports car
>buying a small pickup for towing shit
>offroading in a small pickup
Shit opinions mate.
Rangers make bitches drip themselves
>>13932793
4k is way too much for a 98 ranger regardless of miles. Try and get it for cheaper.
