HYPER 5 CONCLUDED
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto
You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto
It's official br/o/s, Porsche had done it again.
FERRARI AND MCLAREN FANBOYS BTFO
Isn't that like such a minuscule difference that it doesn't even matter? I'm not sure why anyone would be mad that their favorite car is 0.02 seconds slower than the next.
does anyone actually give a shit about supercar lap times
it's not like you'll be able to own one, and if you do, it'll end up being a garage queen anyway
918 is fastest in drag as well, followed by Bugatti, then P1, LaFerrari, and Huayra.
>Pic related, the only part of the 918 the others will ever see.
>>13891802
I dont think the other cars sit that high up, anon.
>>13891783
>diference of .02 seconds from second
>diference of .2 seconds from third
that's driver skill, not a faster car. even the 4th and 5th positions are only there because of driver skill. switch drivers and the score would be diferent.
>>13891838
>Lap time more than 4 seconds slower on a short track
>I-it's just driver errar guise!
Stay buttmad
>>13891783
The Veyron was never a track car, just point and shoot and it is 10 years old already, though it's extremely surprising it managed a faster lap than the Pagani.
>>13891857
It is though, Go look at OVG, Okayam had people in the mid pack 10+ seconds slower then top driver.
>>13891857
benchracing everyone.
>>13891783
I knew it. Porsche knew it too. There was a reason they were the only ones willing to let people test with their car any way they wanted from the beginning.
>>13891870
It didn't really surprise me much. The Huayra is quick, but it's way down on power compared to the others. It's one of those cars that you want to include even though it might not compete, just because it's so damn nice.
>>13891875
Yes, different people. This test was with the same driver.
>>13891838
4 seconds is a whole different class of car. I hope they didn't get drivers that shit for this kind of test.
>>13891893
I got the same times on the GT-R, 911 and Camaro.
It's completely down to driver skill.
>>13891898
Hello there, you're quite purty
>>13891898
do you seriously think this will have a chance
>>13891904
It may have a shot, if you're talking about the burgerring that is
>>13891898
can't tell if ironic or serious desu
>>13891937
I have a feeling it might kill someone on burgerring.
>>13891939
>>13891937
>>13891904
Already took 13 lap records, including Laguna Seca an Willow Springs
>>13891870
>though it's extremely surprising it managed a faster lap than the Pagani.
I agree with this actually, very surprising given how different the cars are.
>>13891988
>those tires
Jesus...
>4WD is faster than FR
This is not news. I'm a McLaren fan boy but the Porsche is definitely faster around a track, but only because of its drivetrain. There's a reason r32 GTRs got banned from Bathurst.
>>13892156
R32 GT-Rs handle well.
R32 GT-Rs weren't much heavier than the Falcadores
Veyron is fucking HEAVY and didn't handle as well as its compatriots from 2005 much less for now
>>13891904
>have a chance
does the 918 have a chance?
>>13891799
you could put the time difference down to driver error it being that low.
>>13892156
>oversimplifying shit this much
if you honestly think that's the main deciding factor you should go back to school
>>13892482
>made-up lap time comparo meme
sure kid
>>13891802
That'd be good because it's the best looking part. Front looks bland, or at least too much like other Porsches.
Are those times how quickly the cars kill their occupants?
>>13892591
the Viper will BTFO all of them in that regard too
>>13892584
http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1100759_2016-dodge-viper-acr-sets-13-lap-records-outmuscles-p1-918-spyder-video
>>13891802
Well, the ass is the most important part in a hypercar after all.
Japanese DaVinci also agrees.
>>13892156
It's not so much about AWD, the advantage is mainly in energy recovery and torque vectoring on the front wheels.
>>13891802
>traction limited cars
>surprised the AWD one is faster in a straight line
Also, it's a guy who drives mainly VAG products (lamborghini, Audi, Porsche), which would be enough to explain the 0.02 seconds between the Porsche and the Ferrari. Y'know besides a light breeze. Or half a degree of tire temperature.
>>13892735
>implying the Bugatti is not AWD
>Guy mainly drives VAG cars, must be instantly faster in the Porsche
Man I'd thought I heard it all
>>13892762
Bugatti is AWD too, but geared towards top speed, and pigfat. Hellcat tier. It didn't even have a chance in hell. Look up the Top Gear comparison between the F1 and old Veyron. Despite the manual gearbox in the F1, the Veyron need to go above 240 kph before it even started reeling in the F1, nevermind overtake it.
About him racing VAG cars: that was a joke to emphasize how an 0.02 second difference is statistically insignificant. One of the cameras they mounted could have blocked airflow more one of the cars. They may not have had optimal tire pressure. A gnat's fart might actually have caused that 0.02 second disparity - that's how small of a difference it is.
>>13891783
I wonder how the best efforts of Ultima or Koeniggsegg would fare?
>>13892910
I really think Koenigsegg, no matter how cool the cars may be, has nothing to offer. I can't recall anything it's really proven it's claimed it have done recently. Ultima on the other hand, that would be more in Radical territory would it not?
>>13892910
An Ultima would smoke a 918
