>Designers hate them!
Who will be the underdog and release a sensible car?
>>13838480
I just want a couple with a long hood, smaller back, small windows, that I can mod to go rocket fast
>>13838486
COUPE
>>13838480
Less to do with designers and more to do with crash standards. The high sills on new cars are needed to meet side crash safety requirements, hense the small windows. It sucks, but not really a choice designers have
>>13838480
What's so bad about low, swept windshields? They're more aerodynamic.
Since when is aerodynamic bad?
Are people just forcibly making up new things to hate since new cars are getting so much better than the shit they fed us 5-15 years ago?
>>13838863
>What's wrong with having poor visibility?
Gee I wonder. You can't dismiss legitimate issues as "HURR U GUYS JUST HATE NEW KARS"
>>13838871
I can see out of most of these new cars just fine.
Wind height was never a problem. Overly thick pillars like that Nissan's C pillar is.
AFAIK it's a crash safety thing. Ditto the THICK pillars on cars these days. And the high hoods I think is a pedestrian safety thing.
>>13838489
No fucking way
That's not real is it?
How about we just band these 6klb trucks and huge SUVs?
Or make driving one a hassle so soccer moms stop buying them.
Only reason we have crossovers and no windows is because of these stupid trucks and SUVs that are needlessly bought
>>13838953
http://www.lexus.com/models/RX
>>13838480
>>13838887
It is probably fine on gridline style flat roads but as soon as you start looking at oblique corners on a grade I often find myself having to ask my passenger if there is anything coming up the hill or if there is even a road where I am going. If no passenger then I have to lean over to peer out the passenger side window.
>manlet
At a flat 6'0" I think I have a better chance than most people in this world at seeing out of these things.
>>13838966
Uh-oh
>>13839360
>>13838863
>low, swept windshields
you mean jacked up beltlines?
>>13839646
the glass is half full
>>13838975
I had an idea a few years back about making a light commercial vehicle license
Basically it's a $500 tax stamp that will be refunded if you have a legitimate need for a vehicle over 4500lbs (farmer, hauling shit etc)
It would basically prohibit soccer moms from owning fuckhuge monstrosities, while allowing people with a legitimate need a way to keep them
>>13839661
the glass has poor visibility in regards to previous iterations.
>>13839661
No, it's half empty.
>>13838975
>>13839715
I think a lot of us had that idea. But why refund it?
$1000 tax on registration for a 3000lb+ vehicle. $2500 for 4000lb+ vehicle.
Why can't commercial vehicles largely be made to be under 4000lb, too? Those US Mail trucks are 2700lb and hold 1000lb of cargo.
And if they really need a 4000lb vehicle, they still can, but they pay for making our roads less safe.
It's a vicious cycle where vehicles need more weight for more safety to survive impacts from vehicles that are heavy.
More old fat vehicles would be scrapped if they couldn't be sold because the $1000 or $2500 extra cost to register it isn't worth it.
>>13838489
It looks like it has downs
>>13838489
ALMOST THERE LEXUS
ALMOST THERE
>>13838486
>>13840208
Could use being like 2 inches higher and could use a smaller grill, but that'll do.
>>13840041
>a thousand fucking dollars to drive a 3000 lb+ plus vehicle, becomes $2500 the moment I get behind the wheel
Well, there goes my Panther
Why do you propose such Draconian horseshit? The US isn't Europe, and it will never be Europe. Live with it. I have never had truck visibility issues. Why punish everyone not driving a compact car?
>>13840452
Superior shooped version, with production version like proportions.
>>13838480
>How long until windows are completely gone?
rip XP :(
>>13840452
You need the huge grill for all the cooling the Skyactiv-R will need.
>>13838480
what the fuck is this shit?
>>13838863
The car's roofline isn't getting lower, the sheet metal is getting taller.
where's dat greenhouse?
fuck roll over protection and side impact tests
aerodynamics can get bent
lets see those big fishbowls
>>13841748
That looks noice
>>13841927
ok
what the fuck happened to normal and good looking vehicles
>>13841967
lol@the fag running in the background what's his problem
>>13842011
jej look at his gf
>>13842011
>joo cant tek picters roun hurr! mu freedimz!
>>13841919
this guy gets it
>>13841883
Kek Christ
>>13838480
What car is this?
>>13838489
>>13840159
Fucking dammit /o/ stop giving them ideas.
>>13841967
>>13842011
Worry not. Windows in cars is here to stay!
>>13841748
Not bad. Now it's bumped it's way up to butterface.
>>13842180
the last thing i want is my car to crash because i opened too many windows
>>13842180
>microsoft logos in your car
That is so cancerous. Does medical science know about this?
>>13841927
>>13842163
NO
>>13842167
it begins
>>13842245
Jesus Christ! What the fuck man!!
>>13842266
>>13842193
Underrated and witty
>>13842266
GET READY FOR THE FUTURE, ANON
>>13842328
i-i-is this e-e-even your f-final form senpai?
>>13842328
WOAH NELLEH
>>13842328
>HYDRA-FORD
ultimate kek
>>13842341
>>13842351
>>13842368
>>13842400
Is that a Roush?
>>13842407
Is Roush pronounced like "ow" or like douche?
>>13842434
>douche
>>13842434
Like ow, you punched me in the anus with your penis.
>>13842444
>>13842447
Trips wins.
>>13841883
Nice photoshop work
>>13841815
Not really.
The '93 RX7 side intakes weren't functional, it just had that small opening in the middle that was actually used for the radiator and intercooler, and with the right mods it had fine cooling.
You really don't need an opening that big, and I'm sure it'll have plastic cladding if it is that big like the ND MX-5 has.
An opening the size the '99 FD has, with the radiator slanted the opposite way, and actually using side intakes for the intercooler would be perfectly sufficient.
>>13842400
MORE.
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRE
>>13841883
Fuck guys, we could make millions at a car company now but instead we prefer to funpost on /o/
>>13840159
Holy shit my sides
It is really close
>>13843981
Wrong. One of the vents on the FD3S was functional, and the other, cosmetic.
>>13838489
While the grille and belt line are hideous, I do like the angular lines everywhere else.
>>13842400
If I pull that mask off, will you die ?
>>13844103
Wheels seem a bit small
>>13844631
yeah, that's because it's only the base trim model
This is your future, /o/.
>>13844917
>literally no windows
>>13844917
Fuck you, /o/. Stop being always right.
>>13844917
HOTWHEELS
BEAT THAT
>>13844917
I like that
>>13844917
Wait, is that a peugeot or a nissan?
Looks like a mid-engine Altima
>>13845026
N/o/stradamus
>>13847173
can I pet your dog bro
>>13847211
yeah go ahead rubb his ribbs
![4982418+_a4b6f14553cf4140f1bf151034028345[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/0nXVtft.jpg "4982418+_a4b6f14553cf4140f1bf151034028345[1].jpg")
>>13847211
can I pet your autism?
>>13847264
sure
be careful when you cross the street though
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cU4yqYGmvxw
>>13839003
>tfw no AMG tuned Galant
>>13841748
Kinda looks like a RX-7 with bodykit
>>13841927
high visibility shitbox of mine
>>13842011
He's telling the owner to mow his damn lawn
>>13842377
I have another angle
>>13847319
That's a good thing.
The FD had nice proportions as far as FMR cars good. Wheels could have been further to the corners, though. I love the low ass hood and fender arches on the FE concept.
Maybe they'll put the transmission in the back, this time around. Only way I can see them achieving having the rear wheels so far back. That and they'd probably need some carbon fiber in the front.
>>13847382
Nice wheels.
>>13844917
He knows what's up.
>ITT plebs demanding pic related
>>13850496
>thinking binary
>MOAR SAFETY
>MOAR ANGER
>>13851547
desu that might as well be the next xc60
>>13840041
Most hybrids and eVs are 4000 or so due to batteries, my plug in is 3700 because its a battery with a 2 liter!
>>13838966
this one is almost worst without photoshop
>trying to shoulder check in a modern car
I like small windows because of the added protection of the body. I don't need tall glass to see outside, just unobtrusive A-pillars so I can see a full 180 degrees around me. The rear window can be as small, and the C-pillars as thick as the designers want to make them, as long as I have a backup camera which has better visibility than any rear window could provide. This is my opinion.
>>13844917
Theyre working on it
>>13852059
Looks better than the NSX at least.
>>13851996
feeling claustrophobic just by looking at that photo
>>13853120
are you fat
>tfw in a few years cars will be like pic related with a giant logo
>>13853397
>>13852524
No it doesn't. The NSX actually looks good, that is just some blob
>>13853447
New NSX is fucking hideous.
It might look okay if it had that black plastic shit painted the body color
>>13853319
are you dumb
>>13854863
are you mad that you have shit taste
>>13853481
getting rid of the octopus beak entirely is a good start
Did any of the assholes coming up with displays for windshields even think for a moment about depth perception, or are we going to have to wear 3d glasses just to drive?
>>13855136
They will probably have collision sensors
>>13841883
LEL
this is making me miss 90's pure wind tunnel design
This shit is never going to get better, it's all going downhill and it won't stop.
>>13843981
The side intakes were for the oil coolers you spaz, the JDM cars had twin coolers and export cars had a single cooler.
>>13855211
It's a catfish with a retarded nose
was your mom also your dad's sister?
>>13844917
>no windows
If they can somehow integrate a 360° see through display I'd be down for it
But I think that shit is only in like military fighter jets and only in one of them and requires a fucktarded helmet afaik
