Where exactly does one draw the line between a sports/driver's car, and a car with a lot of power that still doesn't belong on the track?
At first I thought "sports cars + compact sedans/coupes" but there are a lot of cars that straddle that line, and some GT cars that do plenty fine at track days.
The germans are an easy example of my question: Where do you draw the line between track-day star, and luxo-cruiser? S5? S6? S7? S8?
M3? M5?
C AMG?, E AMG, CLS AMG? etc.
>>13835653
>a car with a lot of power that still doesn't belong on the track?
That's called a muscle car.
>>13835653
I'll tell you right now. No Mercedes or BMW belong on a track ever.
>car with a lot of power that still doesn't belong on the track
I believe the term is GT car
>5 Series progressively got worse aesthetically
Interesting.
>>13835683
posting in a GT thread
A sports car needs to be purpose built (No M or AMG cars), low slung, 2 doors, sporting intent, good handling and fun. That's how I define a sports car.
It's stupid to classify them into groups anyways when a 4 door econobox based car is the fastest car in time attack.
>>13835701
>File too large (file: 14.38 MB, max: 4 MB).
>>13835738
yui horie
>>13835653
One doesn't. The distinction is entirely arbitrary.
