I just heard that anonymous has just hacked ISIS twitter accounts and want to congratulate anonymous on taking down the twitter accounts for these shit heads. I also would like to know about /news/'s thoughts on this.
http://www.techly.com.au/2016/06/16/anonymous-hacks-isis-twitter-makes-it-as-fabulously-gay-as-humanly-possible/
Oh shit, I meant "twitter accounts for these shit heads" My bad
Oh shit, I meant "twitter accounts of these shit heads" My bad again
>>51684
They're still faggots
>>51701
Why?
>>51684
>I also would like to know about /news/'s thoughts on this.
anything about twitter is stupid as fuck and I don't care
Aren't those twitter accounts monitored by the FBI/NSA etc, where they are used for information gathering?
>>51900
I see your point however the article does mention that the accounts were "pro-ISIS" so they may have not been much of a useful resource in terms of gathering intelligence. These are accounts are most likely used for promoting the Islamic state rather than organising attacks. In theory this could have intervened their recruitment attempts.
>>51684
Bravo anon, bravo.
Whatever. Anonymous has nothing to do with 4chan anymore. Also, they'll reopen twitter accounts. I just wish I could figure out why Twitter and Facebook allow them to be on there. If I owned these sites, id hire a group of Islamic fags to find them and close them.
>>51921
Because FBI and CIA created different extremists groups. Of course they'll let them have accounts.
>>51921
Because freedom of speach which prevents them from censoring who joins
They won't be aware of the accounts unless they flag their page/post
And the Hydra effect: when one's down 3 grows.
Good Job "Anonymous".
I mean, NSA.
>>51987
Twitter has never been about free speech, neither is Facebook. And they're private companies, so they can do whatever the want.
>>51987
>Freedom
>Of
>Speech
If someone spray painted 'FAG' on the side of your car, would you be required to leave it because of free speech?
