Are there any other news sources about this?
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2016/march/31/us-troops-to-russias-border-to-fight-russian-aggression/
>>35605
Shit this is serious stuff
>>35607
Any other sources about the troops moving in
I sure hope nothing bad happens to threaten Donald Trump's "stablemate" status with Putin...
http://www.wsj.com/articles/pentagon-readies-more-robust-u-s-military-presence-in-eastern-europe-1459324801
Here's another source /news/men
>>35616
until trump gets elected and he has them all removed because it isn't fair for us to pay for their protection
...or maybe he just gives them all nukes.
Nothing like the xenophobic Latvians/Estonians and the aggressive Russians pointing nukes at each other. It will almost be as good as the South Koreans, Japanese, Chinese, and Best Koreans all pointing nukes at one another.
Saw these news yesterday in bulletin form.
Apparently they're sending a brigade with 250 tanks(may have seen wrong because 250 tanks is a lot) to try to stop the Russian aggressions toward Europe and to try to dissuade them from annexing more land like they did with Crimea.
The troops and tanks will be on rotation or something but I don't remember for how long or how many will be present at the same time.
Hi all from Russia
do you realy interested this in US?
its so far... what about mexico? when you go to fight?
Here is a better article
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/pentagon-troops-russia-nato_us_56fcd667e4b0a06d5804d177
>>35605
>Russian agression
Good goy.
>>35605
yeah theres fucking truth to it man. Im American stationed in Italy. The only places I go are eastern Europe. Im going to Latvia and Lithuania this summer went to Ukraine last summer.
>>35605
That guy staring at the camera is making me kek.
yeah, Lithuanian here; it's true, I've personally seen troops from the USA here. Not subtle, either. Our news talk about it in the military related sections, sometimes.
>>35684
You should get a better translator.
But yes, we don't want you Russian fuckers destabilizing the region like both of our countries did with Afghanistan. And we don't want your Soviet bloc as unstable as the Middle East. Remember, the United States is the World Police right.
>>36617
Afghanistan fucked itself. Pakistan, Russia and the US (probably in that order) did a lot to make things worse, but the civil war started well prior to any third-party meddling - it started because each of the three governments preceding the warlords that were to come decided it was high time to remove kebab from kebab and the socialists put the pedal to the metal so hard that mullahs and tribal leaders alike started to revolt against all those fancy Western schools teaching secular values and land reforms and what-not that Kabul was trying to push.
Iraq would be a better example for a country that got fucked up by both Russia and the US. Installing a shi'ite government instead of one led by the old Shah was a massive mistake on behalf of the Americans, and the Russians were highly effective at fueling the flames created by the American mistake and now, well, there we go, everything's fucked.
gg no re, really - Putin's winning on just about every front except for the one with China. I definitely agree that this deployment is a good idea, but it's unlikely to actually do enough to change things, especially since Russia all but dominates the soft power war and the US is practically hemorrhaging diplomatic capital left and right.
I seriously hope you guys don't do this.