[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Is this the ugliest train you've every seen /n/?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /n/ - Transportation

Thread replies: 35
Thread images: 15
Is this the ugliest train you've every seen /n/?
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (214 KB, 1762x924) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
214 KB, 1762x924
QUACK QUACK
YOU CAN ONLY POST IN THIS THREAD IF YOUR CUNT HAS QUACK TRAINS
>>
File: FYRA.jpg (1 MB, 3488x2281) Image search: [Google]
FYRA.jpg
1 MB, 3488x2281
>>
>>904748
That thing has far bigger problems than just being plain ugly. A fate perhaps worse than ending up in the middle of Libya
>>
>>904686
It's not THAT ugly...
>>
>caring about appearances
There are actual useful specifications you could care about instead.
>>
>>904686
I like it
>>
File: EMU356_ASR1.jpg (147 KB, 1280x816) Image search: [Google]
EMU356_ASR1.jpg
147 KB, 1280x816
this is an ugly train
>>
>>904686
Post some ugly trains
>>
File: Bw_Lr,_DABbuzf_777.jpg (2 MB, 5463x3713) Image search: [Google]
Bw_Lr,_DABbuzf_777.jpg
2 MB, 5463x3713
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>849122
>>
Not only they're ugly, they are also unserviceable because the company that made them already folded
>>
>>904898
That shouldn't be a problem if the purchase would have been made smartly, that is including the essential schematics.

>inb4 no capitalist company does that!!!
>>
>>904909
open source 4 lyfe
>>
>>904743
based renfe, you can suck a dick desu
>>
>>904823
not ugly, beautifully utilitarian

>>904844
fucking ugly
>>
>>904844
design by
>>
File: 2589593585.jpg (47 KB, 670x376) Image search: [Google]
2589593585.jpg
47 KB, 670x376
>>904785
don't even get me started family
>>
File: FyraAfter.jpg (38 KB, 567x291) Image search: [Google]
FyraAfter.jpg
38 KB, 567x291
>>904785
>>906074
NEVER let italians build trains for you
>>
File: D__KB20150831009-749x415.jpg (74 KB, 749x415) Image search: [Google]
D__KB20150831009-749x415.jpg
74 KB, 749x415
the inside of that train once the kebabs left was the ugliest I've ever seen.
>>
>>904844
Originally from best Germany right?
>>
>>904909
You meant maintenance? Almost every company provides that; LRU,field level maintenance and whatnot.

Problem is when heavier shit starts breaking down (the engine mainly, things that require heavy repair and replacement of whole subunits). Usually only OEM would do this, unless the rail company is willing to pay tons of money to do that shit in-house (which is only logical if the number of train being bought is large enough).

For example, Malaysian rail companies bought so many trains (commuter EMU, intercity EMU, light metro LRV, even some electric locomotives to replace them diesel locos) from one chink company that said company is willing to build a factory there and transferred all (but the best, such as igh-speed train) the technology for the Malaysian to build their train domestically.
>>
>>906138
Yes, but modernised after the merge of the respective railway systems.
>>
>>906255
So when were they built, in the 1970s?
Because i remember seeing a black-white picture of a set being pulled by a steam train.
>>
File: 5937791142_7b026bc97d_b.jpg (570 KB, 1024x683) Image search: [Google]
5937791142_7b026bc97d_b.jpg
570 KB, 1024x683
Southwest trains ancient class 455
>>
>>906304
It would only be moderately ugly in any other livery apart from that. Southwest trains livery is sickeningly bad.
>>
File: et403_%28C%29-Torsten_Giesen.jpg (78 KB, 694x436) Image search: [Google]
et403_%28C%29-Torsten_Giesen.jpg
78 KB, 694x436
>>904743
These were nicknamed Donald Duck, especially in the Lufthansa livery.
>>
>>909545
Didn't some company plan to bring them back into service?
>>
>>910776
Just looked it up, deleted previous comment because it was wrong.
It seems like one will be brought back for regular use. Interior and wiring appear to still be in work though.
>>
>>904686
>Is this the ugliest train you've every seen /n/?

No, that was the train we ran on your mum.
>>
>>904844

Oh, my.
>>
>>909545
Aw yes, the Toblerone Express.
>>
>>904823
You're an ugly train
>>
File: IMG_20160105_160021.jpg (532 KB, 1080x1719) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160105_160021.jpg
532 KB, 1080x1719
All trains are beautiful
>>
File: endmysuffering.png (159 KB, 427x251) Image search: [Google]
endmysuffering.png
159 KB, 427x251
>>904748
Thread replies: 35
Thread images: 15

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.