>if it sounds good, it is good
>>66493546
yeah
pretty much
>>66493546
>people unironically listen to music that sounds bad to them
only on /mu/
Yeah. Music is subjective. Music can't be good, all it can do is sound good to you.
>good only means something in the context of one's personal preferences
>>66493546
>it's great
>all of it was plagiarized and slightly pitched/cut/etc
what about now?
>>66493546
What do you mean by 'sounds good'? Do you mean the production is crisp and well done, or that you enjoy it?
Music can be wel made and therefore 'sound good' while also not being good music.
>>66493902
that you enjoy it
>>66493860
>having personal preferences
>>66493943
>being a blank husk of a human being
>/mu/ """philosophy"""
>my favourite albums are different than the albums I think are the best
>>66493902
>Music can be wel made and therefore 'sound good' while also not being good music.
>>66494122
what's wrong with this?
>>66494292
see >>66493821
if you rate music based on anything other than your enjoyment of it you're fooling yourself
>song sounds great to you
>you enjoy it
>it's not considered good by the best critics, such as Scaruffi
>listening to it still and thinking you enjoy it
I don't know why people do this. Bunch of fucking peasants
>>66494355
Fucking this
If Fantano, Scaruffi or /mu/ don't like it, neither should you, what are you? fucking basic?
>>66494292
the fact that you're a sperg probably
>>66494596
Dumb triptwat. As impossible as it may seem to your projecting autistic intellect, it is completely possible (and ok) to respect something regardless of your enjoyment of it.
>>66494643
this is the most autistic post i've read
>>66494643
>being a musical cuckhold
no I'm ok I'll listen to music I actually like and not be a fucking disgrace thanks
>>66494122
delusional or lying to put themselves on a pedestal
>>66494014
it's a quote from joe meek
Jesus Christ are you all retarded?
OP obviously means that he disrespects people who think that good production equals good music as should all of you. Thinking that good production means good music is fucking stupid.
If everyone in the thread is somehow trolling then well done, I am diddly-mad.
>>66494848
so like the equivalent of cgi making a good movie or good graphics making a good game
>>66493546
if that were true, then only the most unoriginal, repetitive garbage would be considered good by most people
>oh wait
>>66494848
>implying
thanks for projecting your feelings bud
>>66495060
it's real hard living in the wrong generation, isn't it :^ )
>>66495106
nah like 90% of the music i listen to was made after 1990
but
>it's real hard finding music you like that either isn't dad rock or isn't generic pop drivel, isn't it :^)
>>66494861
Exactly.
>>66495106
(You)
>>66493546
tell me about it, i only listen to bootleg recordings of scaruffi farting into a dixie cup
okay it's lil sweet
>>66494848
I read it as either a weak appeal to "muh subjectivity" (not wrong but a tired topic) or essentially "it doesn't matter how you got there as long as you got there" i.e. there is no wrong way to compose or record music, all that matters is the end result.
>>66494326
this exactly
>>66498158
you don't need to point out obvious bait when people are being sarcastic you fucking moron
>>66497882
>>66495281
holy shit when did the flood gates open for the spergs to come in
>>66498533
i need to show you a picture of something real quick
