Pls name attractive patrician female musicians other than grimes for /mu to jizz their pants over
>>66480215
St. Vincent
>>66480335
Godammit.
>>66480335
lol, no
>>66480377
Debbie was good in her days. People need a fresh face.
>>66480377
She's old now though
lavren
>>66480377
is that her penis?
>grimes
>patrician
I would love to tickle Diane Clucks nose after sleeping with her
>>66480215
WHO IST HIS
I MEAN IS THIS
>>66480491
Actually yes. An artist with indie cred, mainstream cred, critics cred, that did everything by herself (incl. production, drawings, music video directing, dancing) and did amazing music, can't be anything below patrician. Like it or not, Grimes is actually patrician, a complete artist.
>>66480717
unanimous approval is plebeian don't you even into contrarianism
>>66480717
Her music is the same fucking shit over and over again and she sucks at singing and masks it behind the fake indie voice
reposting from the waifu thread
>>66480735
>unanimous approval is plebeian
It's not. The plebeian artists don't have such high ratings. Compare Taylor Swift albums ratings with Grimes albums ratings.
Grimes is also an indie artist (completely independent). She's more patrician than mainstream acts such as Kate Bush or Bjork, that have huge sales and huge fanbases. If you consider KB & Bjork patrician, you should do the same with Grimes.
>>66480717
i really hate to break this to you, friend, but while she seems like an incredibly talented person, her music is in fact pretty bad.
but if thats your thing, you be you.
>>66480852
b for bjork?
>>66480811
>Her music is the same fucking shit over and over again
You just proved that you didn't even listen to her music. How are these Grimes songs even similar?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fON6EE1PvlA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2EJMd7ZN7w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb_0LzBv894
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rVIx3VbJTM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUe9rnucPoU
my bb
>>66480335
This
I wonder if it's actually Grimes spamming all these threads
>>66480863
>i really hate to break this to you, friend, but while she seems like an incredibly talented person, her music is in fact pretty bad.
Prove that, friend. I'd like to see your best arguments. Just saying it's bad it's not enough. It doesn't have any value, it's just an empty shell of an argument.
Enchante
>>66480485
WOW
Grouper is wife material
>>66480917
i dont argue about shit like gravity m8.
90s Tori Amos a cute
CUTE!
Also released some great albums 90s-00s
>1992 Little Earthquakes - bretty gud
>1994 Under The Pink - meh
>1996 Boys For Pele - 9/10
>1998 Choirgirl - 8/10
>1999 Venus - 8/10
>2002 Scarlet's Walk - 10/10 literally the GOAT woman singer-songwriter album of all time
>2005 Beekeeper - 9/10
>>66481229
You don't argue about anything at all, apparently.
>>66481373
oh yeah?
>>66481503
Yeah.
>i really hate to break this to you, friend, but
Is an empty platitude.
>while she seems like an incredibly talented person,
Is a subordinate statement.
>her music is in fact pretty bad.
Is also a statement. An argument is a statement backed up with supporting evidence. Unless you explain why you think her music is bad, you aren't making an argument.
>>66480842
you can be "le so indie" and be shit just as you can be signed to a major label and be shit. indie cred is just something that pitchfork can make money off of at their festivals and page view revenue
She was so hot in the 80s
This pic is 2014 and she's still got it.
>>66481679
oh yeah?
>>66481827
Admission of defeat accepted.
Carry on with the posting of attractive, female musicians with good taste.
>>66482007
you think so?
Young Carol King comin through being a hottie on the dl;
Dolores O'Riordan is so fucking hot
>>66480882
2 of the 5 that you listed have decent production but sound pretty similar, all of them ruined by her vocals.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fON6EE1PvlA
her trying to be bjork,
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2EJMd7ZN7w
cringe-worthiest generic pop-attempt song she's ever made by a long shot, really bad video too holy shit
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb_0LzBv894
like i mentioned with the vocals, this has decent production, good pacing but terrible vocals
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rVIx3VbJTM
similar to be a body and vocals ruin it
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUe9rnucPoU
into the trash it goes lmfao can't get more weeab than this
>>66480335
literally a goddamn dorito
>>66482056
you rekt >>66482007
js
why were there so many attractive female musicians in the 80s and 90s?
>>66482274
no way bb
>>66482397
grimes sucking aint a hypothesis
>>66482347
Dude I dunno but Natalie Imbruglia and Leigh Nash were my jam when I was younger.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8N-qO3sPMjc
such a qt
>>66482263
Why is everyone so mean to Annie picking the low hanging fruit?
>>66482347
>bjork will never reverse age
>>66480908
pretty girl g,d,
>>66481802
Goddamn look at those thick Jewish legs
>>66482733
>tfw you weren't born in late 1960s Iceland and became a member of the Sugarcubes, got drunk and had bizarre pagan orgies with Bjork and her friends
>>66482231
Liking/disliking the sound of someone's voice is a perfectly legitimate example of subjective taste. However It isn't an excuse for saying that something is inherently terrible - just that it doesn't appeal to you.
>>66482420
>that appearance on Conan which was her first big TV appearance where she wore a dress
:3
>>66480215
check out esme patterson
https://youtu.be/S_Vz1O0qwsg
>>66481341
>pros
-has big tits
>cons
-has fas
>>66482949
We talking about big tits now?
>>66480215
vicki 4ever
![tori-amos[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/dkgcEbu.jpg "tori-amos[1]")
