Why is RS such trash?
- Home
- Board: /mu/ - Music
- Reading: Why is RS such trash?
Why is RS such trash?
>EP
>>66453769
What's RS?
Is it Regular Show?
If so:
>>66453790
>>66453769
>that make Bjork sound like Kelly Clarkson
wdhmbt
>>66453820
Rolling Stone magazine of course senpai
>>66453769
reminder that if you dont like jnew, you are literally rolling stone tier
>>66453820
i think it means reviewer score
>>66453839
Oh yeah. I forgot they existed.
Yeah, fuck 'em.
accurate review desu
>>66453853
Pleb taste desu
>>66453769
they're not wrong
>>66453870
>EP
they are though
>>66453866
>joanna newsom
>anything but /mu/ trash
>squeak
>>66453769
Ys? More like kys
>>66453923
inb4 poptimism
lol who reads rolling stone
>>66453923
Literally want to suffocate on her feet.
>>66453907
>(You)
>>66453923
two different reviewers, moot point
>>66453853
>>66453907
These
>>66453853
This.
The Stonies got it right for once.
>>66453769
Because of the beatles fetish
>>66453769
There is literally nothing wrong with this image
>>66455881
This. Good harp playing, bad singing, awful orchestration.
>>66453923
lol they gave new adele a 5/5
also
>taking music critics seriously in 2016
like. before the internet, where anyone can find anything, critics actually had a responsibility as tastemakers for unknowing masses
now the profession is basically a joke, especially since the writing itself is so second rate, never analytical from a musical or even emotional standpoint
>>66453769
>people enjoy this lady who sounds like shes dying on every song
You must enjoy shoveling shit in your eardrums to find this type of music appealing.
