I'm betting this guy has never bothered exploring popular music.

>>66448692
"read adorno once" the post

>>66448710
/thread

>>66448692
>superiority
on what basis? most of /his/ is better than this guy

Analogies are only used and appreciated by stupid people, but yes, he is right in that popular music will always be inherently inferior to art music.

>>66448882
>Analogies are only used and appreciated by stupid people
So are adjectives :^)
>>66448842
/his/ is a pretty decent board indeed

>>66448710
Or classical music for that matter.

Songs that tell a story are limited in what they can express, regardless of length.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oP3c1h8v2ZQ

All he's said there is that classical music is a more structurally manipulable vehicle for ideas than pop music. There's no reason as to why that fact should entail its superiority.

The literary analogy is just as retarded. You could argue pop songs utilise the album format to the same effect (IE. a variety of themes organised to a particular framework/narrative), only its less of an inconvenience because you don't need an entire fucking orchestra to pull it off. Pop music is music for the people, not for sheltered airheads in ivory towers

he failed the moment he started comparing one art medium to another

>>66448842
>>66448918
/his/ is my favorite board even though /mu/ is my home.

>>66449305
Both are shit

>>66448692
>browsing /his/
>knowing jackshit about anything
Pick one.

>>66448692
that nigga needs some directions my man

this nigga misspelled pity LOL

truly a supreme gentleman

>>66448882
gonna need an citation

>>66448962
>All he's said there is that classical music is a more structurally manipulable vehicle for ideas than pop music. There's no reason as to why that fact should entail its superiority.

Yea, that should have been the only comment on this thread.