Anthony Fantano is steeped in black culture, we could all take notes from him.
respond to this post and OP will die tonight
>>66378848
>>66378848
hey
>>66378806
>I support #AllLivesMatter
>drink bleach SJWs
>women are the most decadent sluts since the fall of rome
>>66378848
>>66378848
>>66378936
Are we supposed to disagree with these statements or something?
>>66378848
Marcel is objectively better than Fantano at this point. Prove me wrong. protip: you can't.
>>66378885
>>66378848
so long
>>66378936
If somebody hates SJW's and think that everybody should be treated equally that doesn't mean he hates women you fucking cunt
>>66381694
>hate's feminism (the idea that women are equal to men)
>thinks women should be harassed for sayings video games are sexist
>"everybody should be treated equally"
>expects me to take him seriously when he uses a gendered insult (cunt)
too easy
>>66378888
>8888
OP marked for death.
>>66381758
not sure if troll or just tumblr
Also, insults suppose to insult you - just to make sure you understand the purpose of them
>>66381758
an actual person might seriously write this post
>>66381758
>believes that political feminism can be reduced to an egalitarian definition
>thinks that criticism of poorly argued gender commentary constitutes harassment
>nothing wrong with this desu
>believes that insults that make reference to human biology are therefore inherently 'gendered'
oh dear
>>66378848
i got broads in atlanta
I wouldn't say he's stepped into black culture more of just reviewing hip hop music which is a small part of black culture.
>>66381822
>insults suppose to insult you
astute observation
>>66381827
they already did
>>66381873
>egalitarian
wew
>nothing wrong with this desu
even accepting the premise that her criticism is "poorly argued," saying there's nothing wrong with harassment (rape/death threats) is pretty telling. Is it also acceptable to lynch a black person if they have uninformed views?
>believes that insults that make reference to human biology are therefore inherently 'gendered'
>the literal definition of a gendered insult
>>66381758
hmm hmm
let me see here
do I smell a /pol/ user posing as a strawman SJW?
>>66381925
could you leave normie.
>>66378936
>that video
jesus christ
>>66381925
>>believes that insults that make reference to human biology are therefore inherently 'gendered'
>>the literal definition of a gendered insult
words like bitch and prick = insult specific to gender =/= saying a gender is inferior i.e. sexism
>>66381951
No, you smell a "sjw," though perhaps you belong on /pol/ if you think "SJW" is a real thing.
>>66381996
agreed. words like nigger and spic = insult to specific race =/= saying a race is inferior i.e. racism
>>66382000
w e w
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mattress_Performance_(Carry_That_Weight)#Praise
>>66381995
With TheAmazingAtheist putting on a fucking fedora it almost feels like a parody.
They should have renamed the video "loaded questions by youtube celebrities for straw-feminists"
>>66382051
oh man, you referenced an activist
she is quite the "social justice warrior," talking about rape
>>66382024
the difference is context, racial insults were used to put down one ethnicity as inferior while gendered insults afaik were not
>>66378936
Fandangos best vid yet prove me wrong you can't.jpeg
>>66382089
>supporting harrassing someone for a rape that very obviously didn't happen
>calling it art
>>66381925
You act so stupid that I wasn't sure if you understand what an insult mean, I just wanted to check.
Also, I thought your kind don't believe in genders so what's the problem with "gender inherited insults"?
Also why is each and everyone of you always lack knowledge about pretty much everything?, why do you think an insult or criticism is somehow equal to harassment?,do you even know what an harassment is?, because it seems like you just mish-mash shit you heard from wanna be feminists who cry about how bad they are while having enough money to feed a village for a decade and have all the right in the world to do what ever the fuck they want to do.
And why shouldn't you actually?, a low minded self obsessed glassed skin idiot who thinks that an insult on twitter is rape.
>>66382052
if they're so fuckin smart, why can't half of them show their real faces?
>>66382186
They all did in one point of another and you could find their pics.
Also I think only 2 of them didn't, and one of them being Sargon which I know for a fact shows his face on a regular basis
>>66378888
>>66380180
thankyou for giving me a way too look this movie up. i vaguely remembered it but had no way to find it
>>66382141
>while gendered insults afaik were not
Oh wow, gendered insults are not used to insult women. I had no idea, thanks for clearing that up.
>>66382172
>that very obviously didn't happen
[citation needed]
>>66382173
>Also, I thought your kind don't believe in genders so what's the problem with "gender inherited insults"?
I dunno, if I didn't believe in race and you said "all niggers should die," should I not be bothered by your rhetoric by this logic? Does that sound stupid to you?
>Also why is each and everyone of you always lack knowledge about pretty much everything?
I'm wondering the same thing about you.
>why do you think an insult or criticism is somehow equal to harassment?
An insult is harassment....?
Criticism is not. "cunt' is not criticism. Ironically, you're pretty thin skinned about criticism.
>because it seems like you just mish-mash shit you heard from wanna be feminists who cry about how bad they are while having enough money to feed a village for a decade and have all the right in the world to do what ever the fuck they want to do.
What? Which feminists have enough money to feed a village for a decade? Do you have sources for this? Does this cancel out sexism somehow? Please explain?
>And why shouldn't you actually?
Why shouldn't I what?
>a low minded self obsessed glassed skin idiot who thinks that an insult on twitter is rape.
I think insults are rape? That's news to me. Please point out where I said this.
>>66382052
I kind of want to watch it now, it sounds hilariously cringe. I'd be worried about my youtube recommendations getting clogged with anti sjw garbage, tho.
>>66381925
When I said there was 'nothing wrong with this' I was referencing egalitarianism, not harassment. Check my formatting.
As for gendered insults, the origin of 'cunt' as a vulgarism for a vagina (biologically female) has no bearing on the term's usage or meaning. A 'cunt' is a vulgar or annoying person; there is no gendered aspect to its usage.
>>66382285
>Oh wow, gendered insults are not used to insult women. I had no idea, thanks for clearing that up.
Nice strawman. It's not that gendered insults were not used to insult women, but that they were not used to imply that women are inferior. Maybe in 200 years people will use racial slurs to each other like it's no big deal.
>>66382285
the college tribunal threw out the case, she made a porno of the rape, text messages are evidence against it
>>66382173
enough with the memes
>>66378848
Please
>>66382173
not the anon you're talking to, and you probably don't care, but on the off chance you do, when people say "gender is a social construct" they aren't saying "gender isn't real". Money is also a social construct.
>>66382328
plox do you really believe this
like seriously?
this is just so desperate
>>66378848
>>66382328
>Check my formatting
It's meme text, how can I possibly understand what you're trying to say? And Egalitarianism is just a term anti-feminists use who do NOTHING for women's rights.
>has no bearing on the term's usage or meaning
What do you base this on, exactly? What criteria excuses words like cunt, bitch but includes words like nigger and spic.
>>66382343
>but that they were not used to imply that women are inferior.
See above: What do you base this on, exactly? What criteria excuses words like cunt, bitch but includes words like nigger and spic.
>the college tribunal threw out the case
Do you know how the justice system works in America? Not guilty != didn't do it, it means there's a lack of evidence. Do you believe OJ Simpson is innocent? Does this only selectively apply to women?
>she made a porno of the rape
irrelevant
>>66382505
>Do you know how the justice system works in America? Not guilty != didn't do it
College tribunals are harsher than real criminal courts, so the fact that a COLLEGE TRIBUNAL didn't even hear the case but threw it out is strong evidence that it didn't happen.
>See above: What do you base this on, exactly? What criteria excuses words like cunt, bitch but includes words like nigger and spic.
bitch = a bad person who is also a woman
spic = a bad person because they are Hispanic
One is bigoted, the other is not.
>>66380033
marcel is just an edgy avant teen. if you gave him an album full of farting noises and labeled it as avant-garde he would give it a 10
>>66378848
thanks bro
>>66382470
I believe it too it doesn't sound too unreasonable, and I've been on your side the entire time assuming you're the poster arguing against him previously
>>66382614
I'm not even going to touch the rape stuff, but if you seriously don't think bitch is a sexist slur idk what to tell you. Women are called bitches all the time. And when a man is called a bitch, it's because he's "being weak" or "acting like a woman" i.e. "quit being a little bitch".
>>66382505
If I called my white guy friend a cunt it would be funny and make sense but if I called him a spic it wouldn't because it doesn't make sense
Use common sense
>>66382655
These are all my (you)s itt:
>>66381951
>>66381996
>>66382051
>>66382141
>>66382172
>>66382343
>>66382683
uh no, bitch usually means someone is being pedantic or whiny e.g. "bitching" "bitchy"
>>66382285
Everything is rape to you guys, every comment, every idea that you don't like, everything is rape, I usually don't go into arguments in fucking /mu/ on this shit, but every fucking sjw I ever talked with always have this weird idea that everything is somehow related to rape and that you actually live in a rape culture.
And when I say "glassed skin" I mean the exact person who thinks that calling someone a "cunt" is problematic and that a video game charterer that is sexuallized is something to scream about.
And if you are interested in rich sjw's just check it.
Also, nowhere did I imply that "cunt" is the criticism, I'm not sure how you even got to this conclusion.
And you can see it everywhere, every fucking sjw activist had tons of flagging and false reporting about videos that were pure criticism.
And to your question - first - there is a huge,huge jump between calling someone a name and saying "this group must die".
Second of all there is a difference between what a person say and what he does, I'm a jew and I couldn't give a rats ass if someone started jew cursing or say "all jews must die" etc.
>>66382763
Being whiny; needs to toughen up. Falls under the same category. And you're telling me you've never hear a man call another man a bitch when he was showing weakness?
>>66382763
we desperate now boys
we graspin
>>66382816
>you've never hear a man call another man a bitch when he was showing weakness?
no, that's "pussy" (which I do think is a gendered insult actually)
All your opinions matter. :)
>>66382817
You're legitimately wrong
Stop -whining- like a little -bitch-
>>66382836
Yeah but another insult is "dick" or "dickhead" which is suppose to mean "idiotic or bad behavior" - does this mean that society thinks that men are bad and idiotic now?
>>66382934
If you think the connotations of bitch refer to women, then yes.
>>66382968
bitch just mean a female dog, so bitching means whining
>>66382614
>College tribunals are harsher than real criminal courts, so the fact that a COLLEGE TRIBUNAL didn't even hear the case but threw it out is strong evidence that it didn't happen.
Once again, [citation needed].
Even if there was a complete lack of evidence, how does that prove the alleged rapists innocence. Please explain this logic.
>One is bigoted, the other is not.
By what criteria do you make this decision. I've already asked you once, please respond to this.
>>66382767
>Everything is rape to you guys, every comment, every idea that you don't like, everything is rape, I usually don't go into arguments in fucking /mu/ on this shit, but every fucking sjw I ever talked with always have this weird idea that everything is somehow related to rape and that you actually live in a rape culture
Once again, please tell me when I said that insults are rape.
>And when I say "glassed skin" I mean the exact person who thinks that calling someone a "cunt" is problematic and that a video game charterer that is sexuallized is something to scream about.
Ok. How are you not equally as "glassed skinned" for being upset at my alleged outrage? Please explain the difference between my "outrage" and yours.
>And if you are interested in rich sjw's just check it.
Could you please provide examples, google did not return anything. Could you also please explain how this invalidates claims of sexism?
>Also, nowhere did I imply that "cunt" is the criticism, I'm not sure how you even got to this conclusion.
What is the purpose of using that word if not to criticize me? Was it a term of endearment?
>And you can see it everywhere, every fucking sjw activist had tons of flagging and false reporting about videos that were pure criticism.
Could you please provide some citations? Since it's everywhere, this should be very easy to find.
>And to your question - first - there is a huge,huge jump between calling someone a name and saying "this group must die".
Okay, so ignore the "die" part, if I say "I hate niggers," that is not a racial insult, correct?
>Second of all there is a difference between what a person say and what he does,
Ah, okay. So language is not relevant, only actions? How do you feel about language that influences actions?
If I hired a hitman to kill you, should I be let off the hook? Afterall, it was only the hitmans actions that killed you.
>>66383130
>Once again, [citation needed].
You can very easily find this stuff on the Internet (or by reading the Wikipedia article I already posted) if you weren't so (pic related)
>Even if there was a complete lack of evidence, how does that prove the alleged rapists innocence. Please explain this logic.
That combined with the other two points make it extremely unlikely that the rape occurred.
>By what criteria do you make this decision. I've already asked you once, please respond to this.
Read the two lines above that statement. Do you disagree with them?
Now you're just being ridiculously pedantic.
>>66378848
thank god
>>66383257
Go to every video criticizing feminism and see how many flagging it got, go to thundefoot and see how he almost lost his job as a scientist because of some sjw's who didn't like his opinion(btw they did it in the week when his dad died from cancer and they had the lack of humanity to laugh at him for that as well, you can check his video for proofs).
And I'm not outraged by your comments, I'm a bit shocked that I have to do this on /mu/, but I'm not in the point where I'll scream and shout or anything, where did it ever seen like it?.
google harder, you'll find how much Sarkisian and her mates are doing and how did they came from very wealthy homes.
I'm not saying there are no racial slurs, I'm saying - slurs will be slurs, someone can call me a "god damn kike" or do an ash related joke or whatever - I don't care.
Language and ideas will lead different people to do different things - it's not for you to control it because this will never end, there is no last stop when it come to censorship,and yes - hate speech is still speech, as much as stupid speech will still be speech and as long as it stay in the public discussion it is alright.
And if you hired a hitman to kill me then you paid a professional person to get rid of me, you used goods to get your goal - therefore you did the act via extension, however, if you told somebody you know you hate me and you wished I was dead and he decided on his own to kill me - then it has nothing to do with you.
>>66383299
>You can very easily find this stuff on the Internet
Oh wow, ask for a citation and you still won't provide one. I'll ask again, and you can give another bullshit reason not to give it. The true calling of someone who is full of shit.
>That combined with the other two points make it extremely unlikely that the rape occurred.
Could you please tell me why "porn" of the incident made it impossible for it to happen? By the same logic, did the guy who had his dick cut off and later did porn also make that up? If not, could you please tell me what logic excuses one of these acts but not the other?
>Read the two lines above that statement. Do you disagree with them?
Yes.
>Now you're just being ridiculously pedantic.
Okay. By what criteria do you make this decision. I've already asked you twice, please respond to this.
Like, dude, just explain yourself. It's not hard.
>>66383574
>Go to every video criticizing feminism and see how many flagging it got
Uhhhh, how do you expect me to actually measure this? I went to an anti-feminist video and I saw no information about who flagged it or how often it was flagged. Are you privy to this information? Please share.
>go to thundefoot and see how he almost lost his job as a scientist because of some sjw's who didn't like his opinion
Could you please provide a citation for this, specifically what job he almost lost, how he almost lost it and who was responsible.
>btw they did it in the week when his dad died from cancer and they had the lack of humanity to laugh at him for that as well, you can check his video for proofs
Oh my, could you please provide a citation that "SJWs" (whomever they are) laughed at thunderfoot becuase his dad died. Thanks.
>google harder, you'll find how much Sarkisian and her mates are doing and how did they came from very wealthy homes.
I did google. Why does your type always tell me to google. Please provide the citations you have, since this is as easy as a simple google search. I tried your method and found nothing. Could you also please tell me how the income of a specific person somehow negates the representation of women in media? thanks!
>I'm not saying there are no racial slurs, I'm saying - slurs will be slurs, someone can call me a "god damn kike" or do an ash related joke or whatever - I don't care.
Oh, I see. You don't care. I'll make sure to let everyone who has ever been insulted/discriminated against that once, a person on the internet was insulted and did not care. Thanks for you input.
>Language and ideas will lead different people to do different things - it's not for you to control it because this will never end
You're right, language and ideas do lead people to do things. Glad we agree. I never said we should control what people say, but thanks for arguing on behalf of an argument I didn't make!
>>66383574
>hate speech is still speech, as much as stupid speech will still be speech and as long as it stay in the public discussion it is alright.
I agree. I'm not against free speech. Glad we agree. I'm for criticism of hate speech, which is in line with free speech. Glad you agreed with me.
>And if you hired a hitman to kill me then you paid a professional person to get rid of me, you used goods to get your goal
And what if someone decided to kill your for the reasons I stated, not for monetary gain? If I just said you're a prick? Is that different then you saying "niggers are subhuman, kill them," and someone killing black folks. How is this different? Please explain.
>however, if you told somebody you know you hate me and you wished I was dead and he decided on his own to kill me - then it has nothing to do with you.
So, assuming you're Jewish (as you've claimed), if I launched a campaign "kill all jews, they're evil!" and someone killed you, you wouldn't blame me? that's thoughtful! Do you absolve Hitler for his crimes? He didn't kill any Jews personally...
>>66383743
go to Thunderfoots video about the topic.
Here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5TMmxlsLN8
And we tell you to google it because it's there, you probably didn't look into it.
You can't put discriminated against side by side with insulted, because discrimination is an act that deliberately cause harm on a physical aspect which could determinate the person's road a head without him having any control about that while an insult is just a fucking insult for fuck sake, a specially when it's online, you don't have to look at it if you don't want, you have the choice,and btw - you don't have to be insulted as well - that is your choice as well.
>>66383803
I answered you this already but I'll repeat that again - "however, if you told somebody you know you hate me and you wished I was dead and he decided on his own to kill me - then it has nothing to do with you."
>>66383803
Hitler lead a country and created rules that assure jews will suffer not to mention the planning and execution of the final solution - a far cry from saying "nigger" online I have to say.
And if you launched a campaign that says "kill all jews, they're evil" and did nothing about it and nobody did anything than you - go a head, people do it all the time - it's called neo-nazi rallies
>>66378848
Here's your reply, let's hope for the best
>>66381758
Look at this bait
>>66383922
>go to Thunderfoots video about the topic.
jesus fucking christ. anytime I ask for some proof from an alt rightist I get some hour long video. could you as least tell me WHERE in this long ass video im supposed to look for this supposed proof I'm looking for? please????
>And we tell you to google it because it's there, you probably didn't look into it.
Cool, I didn't look for it. You did, so please provide it.
>You can't put discriminated against side by side with insulted, because discrimination is an act that deliberately cause harm on a physical aspect
Not true, by the way:
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/discriminate
>you don't have to be insulted as well - that is your choice as well
okay. so let's say I was somehow able to pass a law that said white people had to pay 500% of taxes, is that discriminatory or just "your choice?" What if I preached "black supremacy" and as a result, no one let you have a job and arrested you for the most trivial matters? Is that still "your choice?"
>>66383958
And, I'll reiterate my last point: is Hitler absolved of his crimes against Jews because he only suggested what should happen and didn't actually kill any Jews?
>>66384013
What point are you trying to make?
Half this thread needs to go back to /pol/ and that tumblrite (or two) talking about women's rights need to go back to tumblr. This is a music board.
>>66384250
>implying it isn't just /pol/acks roleplaying as tumblr starwmen
>>66384250
>I'm an enlightened fence sitter
If the topic of women's rights comes up and you answer is "le middle ground," you're just as bad as a /pol/tard desu.
>>66384383
I'd like to blame everything on /pol/ but the amount of effort that's going into this roleplaying is really worrying.
>>66384440
>talking about politics on the music board
Seriously fuck off, not everyone cares about your imaginary problems and imaginary wars.
>>66378848
plz
>>66384132
>Not true, by the way:
>http://www.dictionary.com/browse/discriminate
The definition literally proves his/her point.
>The new law discriminates against foreigners. >He discriminates in favor of his relatives.
These are physical things, not like saying words on the Internet.
>>66384383
So a few people from /pol/ came here to roleplay as strawmen, then more people from /pol/ thought the other /pol/ users were actual sjws and came here to argue with them?
So /pol/ is literally fighting with itself and none of the participants in the argument are aware of this.
more proof that /pol/ is cancer
>>66384529
Once again, if you can't just say "women are equal to men" you are part of the problem and you belong on /pol/.
So, how about it anon? Can you say that?
>>66378848
just how many times you gonna die OP??
>>66381758
>gendered insult
lol nice, here is your reply you mad cunt
>>66384781
Women = men
Politics ≠ music
I'm going to stop replying to this shitty thread now
:^)
>>66381758
I'd say that this is b8 but /mu/ does have legitimate hardcore leftists that would say shit like this.
>>66384896
If women = men, why did you need to make a distinction between "politics" and "music?" If these things are equal, shouldn't "politics" and "music" have equal representation? If not, why? How does this conflict with your prior statement (women = men)?
>>66385219
>women are equal to men
>hardcore leftist
kek, im on 4chin
>>66385219
what kind of shithole do you live in to have this ridiculously skewed image of the world
