Liszt vs ChopinWhich one do you like more and why?

Brahms, Mahler, Mendelssohn and even Tchaikovsky are better than Liszt + Chopin

Chopin because he put more feels into his music

I like Liszt music, its fun.

>>66357089
Mahler next to those talentless hacks? REEEE Get out of my board

>>66357092
>>66357131
i feel like this sums it up in the simplest way

>>66357089
Nasty

>>66357133
>Any of those other guys
>Talentless
what have you been smoking? How can someone think Mahler has talent but not Brahms? Its clearly you who should leave.

File: 201.jpg (345KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

345KB, 1080x1920px

>>66357089
>tchaikovsky

i think the only thing i've enjoyed by that guy was his 4th symphony.
i heard his 5th symphony yesterday and it was so fucking tasteless, but maybe the recording i have is just shit.

>>66356959
Rachmaninov

File: 1468169527913.png (147KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

147KB, 500x281px

I prefer Robert Fripp

>>66357287
Rachmaninov can suck my balls. I'd punch him square in the mouth if he still alive.

>>66356959
Chopin was a melodic/emotional genius, Liszt was more of a mechanical genius.

Chop's music is obviously better but both are pretty different at their cores anyway

File: $wm1_0x700_$_8553510_cov.jpg (76KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

76KB, 700x700px

>>66357255
Try the 6th symphony and his ballets, as well as pic related