I used to hate his work at the beginning, then I tried to understand how he made his sound, and became more and more interested by these blip/metallic/blop sounds. We can say whatever we want but the sound design is tight
Here are a vine and a video of SOPHIE using the Elektron Monomachine :
https://vine.co/v/MdvBIrmxF2n
https://vid.me/P2CG
>>66302541
yeah he's okay, Think A.G. Cook has more potential sound design wise. sophie's compilation kinda sucked but the songs he played live were bangers so hope he officials releases them soon
Too bad pc music isn't taking off well
>>66302604
this tbqh
Night Slugs, Keysound and Crazylegs do it way better
>>66302590
Yeah seems that unreleased SOPHIE's stuff is the best
>>66302604
I find it pretty experimental - like GRM experiments in the 1950's
>>66302604
>this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BY9ejw1728w
>not harsh
i mean as far as synths go..
>>66303126
its not harsh
freaking dean blunt is making tracks like that.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkxWkXYzVrs
I like them but the people over analyzing their work clearly aren't familiar with electronic music
>>66302655
all these labels are making more experimental stuff. sophie's edge is that he's taken a book from capsule and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RA-lXK0c0g
to make it more accessible
>>66303154
lmfao that dean blunt track doesn't even come close, what are you on m8
listen i have definitely heard more harsh noise than you, and i'm saying that sophie track is harsh as far as synth sounds go. shrill, high pitched noises are generally more uncomfortable to listen to, and that track sustains the sensation.
this dean blunt track is just a bandcamp tier nothing with no similarities btw
>>66303126
invert some triads to 3/4 be a man
>>66303200
Wrong
>>66303230
by 3:20 he might as well have put nails on a chalkboard samples
>>6630325
Both artists are garbage. listen to more music
sophie ripoffs uffie and capsule
blunt is a hack
get better taste in music
>>66303295
yeah but you also have an awkward/mediocre singing voice while sophie gets qt girls to sing for him and then manipulates their voices to his ideal
>>66303154
These labels make nothing experimental.
Night Slugs put out club bangers.
Keysoubd pits out grime and dubstep.
Crazylegs puts out grime and bait-pop grime.
>>66302541
Could someone explain to me what exactly he is doing in these videos?
>>66303593
>I synthesize all sounds except for vocals using raw waveforms and different synthesis methods as opposed to using samples. This means considering the physical properties of materials and how those inform the acoustic properties. For instance -- why does a bubble have an ascending pitch when popped and why does metal clang when struck and what is this clanging sound in terms of pitch and timbre over time? How do I synthesize this? Perhaps after learning about these things it might be possible to create entirely new materials through synthesis.
>Sophie primarily uses the Elektron Monomachine and software to develop his music.[26]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elektron_Monomachine
every sophie related thread is a laugh.
I know william abit and hannnnnnah
fun lads but all this shit you guys write is rubbish. get off the computer maybe play pokemon go. lmao
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWr6LAX2EUE
pc forums is even worse
>>66303746
you are *literally* a poseur
>>66303762
literally is 2016 most used word by hipster
Congrats babe
Murlo and his label do it way better.
https://youtu.be/rbyrsIBSaJA
>>66303281
lol "Uffie"
