ITT: Highly-acclaimed albums that are undoubtedly and objectively shit
>>66248304
I don't think there's a bad song on this album.
I AM AN ANTICHRIST
NO DOGSBODY
MUUMMAAAAAAAAAY
Johnny Rotten's vocal performance on this is pure entertainment, funny as fuck and completely drenched in sardonic, sarcastic snot.
Not even close to objectively shit
>>66249291
Well, musically speaking, Sex Pistols were absolute garbage.
>>66248304
Truth
>>66248349
more like AYEEEE AM N ANTEEKRAISTAH
>>66249318
So was early beatles, and so is modern hip hop, but we don't talk about that, now do we?
>>66249318
just their bass player desu
It's acclaim comes from its cultural impact. The material is an attempt at emulating Johnny Thunders (hard to name a punk band that wasn't doing that at that time) while John Lydon goes on his own antics. Definitely wasn't the greatest album to come out of that scene, but it's a fun rock'n'roll album.
>>66249534
yeah and the rest weren't talented enough to make up for it
>>66249534
>>66250465
Not even Sid on the album. It was Glen Matlock.
Why does /mu/ shit on the Sex Pistols all the time? They were literally the trend setters for punk, Ramones may have been first but the Pistols were more influential, and their tiny discography is good for what it is.
>>66248304
Lol that's one of the best rock albums ever
>>66249318
>missing the point of punk
Go back to listening to ELP and U2, faggot
>>66250547
Just because you're influential doesn't mean you're shit.
>>66250547
>Why does /mu/ shit
Cus they are fat anon, and that's what fat people do, they eat and shit.
>>66250547
>They were literally the trend setters for punk
>Ramones may have been first
These are both wrong
Why does /mu/ hate punk
>>66249318
No shit all those early punk bands that was the point, anyone could do it
>>66250547
Ramones was waaaaay more influential than Sex Pistols
>>66250594
/mu/ hates music
>>66250589
Ramones was the first punk band. How is this wrong?
>>66250631
Cause it's wrong/not true?
>>66250589
Wrong
>>66250606
This can be argued but Pistols had more influential outside of punk too with bands like Joy Division
>>66250650
Ok what band was the first punk band?
>>66250737
Cheap Trick
>>66250737
Mozart. He was the GG Allin of the 18th century
>>66250763
Are you fuckin kiddin me? Cheap Trick was obviously hard rock
>>66250737
Television
>>66250801
Ramones were the first band to call themselves punk rock
Therefore they are punk rock
>>66250801
lol no you might as well name drop Patti Smith, New York Dolls, and Iggy Pop
>>66250581
do you think you are funny?
>>66250801
This. Iggy Pop and the Stooges was pretty much punk as well
>>66249530
I shot on early Beatles all the time and your really over-generalizing with he hip-hop comment.
The sex pistols while they were hugely important and influential, but made really shitty music.
>>66250965
"pretty much" as in proto-punk
>>66251005
*shit on
>>66248304
Wouldn't call this album shit, but most of it is pretty forgettable.
>>66248304
Self Esteem is the only non-forgettable song on there tbqh irc
>>66251480
Seventeen? Or are you talking about the Offspring?
>>66250560
So is the point of punk being absolute shit musicians. No wonder you're an absolute pleb.
>>66250602
doesnt even qualify as shit. shit would at least provide fertilizer. you insult shit by listing this here.
>>66250560
>Go back to listening to ELP and U2, faggot
No, I'm listening to PiL
>>66252490
Build the wall
>>66248337
I don't think there are any good songs on that album either.
>>66252490
I think this gets most of its credit because of its size and concept. As far as Floyd albums go it doesn't compare to the early years.
>>66252490
Was just about to post this, it's fucking awful.
>>66250547
What is Raw Power?
>>66250547
Ramones the first punk band!? The Stooges? MC5? New York Dolls?
>>66248304
Fuck off OP!
>>66254647
They're considered Proto punk
>>66250547
They were not influential. They were just famous. The Sex Pistols, despite their enormous success, have not influenced anything about punk, not the sound, not the composition, not the style, nothing.
The Ramones and The Sex Pistols are nothing more than t-shirt material: they made some mess in the UK and US, brought the term "punk" to its fame and disappeared. They're just a name in rock history books that has no relation to anything today.
>>66254780
But Ramones are undoubtedly good.
The Exploited are very good.
>i don't know what context is
the album was released in 1977 dimwit
>>66254987
>implying that affects the albums' quality
Nobody is denying how important it was culturally. Good? Debatable. But it's just not great music.
>>66250737
Probably the Stooges or Patti Smith or The Sonics or something
