Can someone explain to me why post-punk is over- intellectualized. I mean are people so sentimental towards punk that they rush to laud anything associated with it?
what the fuck are you talking about
over intellectualized? what do you mean
>>66237518
this
>>66237503
Ugh. Just fuck off and die you fucking cretin.
>>66237518
I guess over-hyped could fit too
>>66237503
teenagers are drawn to it for some reason
and you know how they can be
>>66237503
You're over- intellectualized.
punk was pretty cool. people like cool things. expanding punk into different aesthetics makes people of those aesthetics pretty cool, so people like it.
>>66237590
it couldn't, because those suggest completely different things, and in any case are both inaccurate, as is your understanding of post-punk's "relationship" with punk
>>66237503
Because people who like post-punk are pseudo-intellectual 17 year-olds who's parents are just keeping them down and trying to make them conform
>>66237710
>pseudo-intellectual
got it
>>66237698
enlighten me then
>>66237710
Generalization is the worst thing you can do when discussing music.
Pseudo intellectuals. Big words.
I really like post punk. Bands like magazine, the fall, the sound, wipers. Post punk is really the only reason you can argue that the 80's were the best decade for music.
>>66237747
about what? you haven't asked a single question that has made sense
