Plebs
>Attracted to music by non-musical attributes (Lyricism, politics, image)
>Unable to intelligibly explain why they like or dislike a piece of music (''I like it because it's good'')
>Get mad or uncomfortable when you introduce them to different kinds of music
>Unable to accept change
Patrician
>Decide their own values for what makes music great, disregarding any non-musical attributes
>Able to carefully critique a piece of music
>Open to experimentation and new forms of music
>Willingly accepts change
>Believes art is subjective
Music taste isn't what you listen to.
Music taste is how you listen.
Agree or disagree?
entirely. entirely, my meming lad.
Why though?
i've never fully understood the "lyrics mean nothing meme" I can see how they aren't inherently musical but what about harmonics or contrasting the instrumentation with how they are delivered?
Plebs
>consumers
Patricians
>creators
>distributors
>>66213115
The distributor wouldn't even exist without the consumer dumbass
a patrician would not disregard non-musical attributes, he can appreciate and judge their inclusion in the piece and how they contribute to it.
Agreed
>>66213143
Nor would the consumer exist without the distributor dumbass
>>66213161
ohoho lookit him go !!
>>66213143
Why call him a dumbass?
>>66213177
Wrong
Pleb
>spends his time creating arbitrary distinctions and posts them on Chinese imageboards so he can feel superior to underage kids
>>66213196
Right
>>66213199
pleb
>replies to said image board thread
inb4
>replies to said reply
>>66213054
>2016
>still cares about having superior music tastes
