ITT: Albums that require an IQ of 140 or above to be appreciated thoroughly
>>66192459
my diary desu
>>66192459
indubitably
no album of popular music requires an IQ of over 80 to appreciate
Reminder that IQ is meaningless at anything except judging how good someone is at IQ tests and any claims to the contrary is promoting pseudoscience
>>66193209
>>66193265
It's okay anon, 105 isn't that bad of a score.
>>66193265
And racism.
>muh africans have lower IQ
>>66193265
t. guy who doesn't have IQ enough to understand the significance of IQ
>>66193265
that's not exactly true haha. IQ tests are a reasonably accurate measure of general intelligence, supported by over a century of research.
>>66194858
haha Im 3 points smarter than you fukkin pleb
>>66194858
If you just keep taking IQ tests since theres no limit on how many you can take, you'll eventually master them and will be able to get the highest score possible. This proves nothing about intelligence, just how good you are at IQ tests.
>>66193288
iq tests are pretty fedora desu especially bragging about scores