PANNED

because it was basically just their last two albums but worse

no the rape was because of the pan

/mu/ is the only place online people still talk about that

No, it just wasn't all that great.

>Larkin is a wild-ass Georgia mountain woman, or She-Shaman, or something. Ha ha!
- Michael Gira

What did he mean by this?

it's accurate

>>66118192
"no"
the seer and to be kind were better though
>>66118194
>he actually said this
nice

"panned"? It got the same rating as Filth

>>66118194
Young God was basically a competition between Michael and his contracted artists to see who could resemble a hippie burnout caricature the most.

>>66118141
who even cares what pitchfork rated it

>>66118156
Panning is literally rape

>8.1
>"panned"
>filth got an 8.1
>"not panned"

wtf are you on about
>>66118372 is correct

are you on fucking meth?

a) this is one of their worst songs
b) on one of their worst albums
c) and they suck as a band in general

i genuinely think p4k would['ve rated lower than the other 2

but i think it would've gotten a 8.5-8.8 or something with a BNM if it weren't for the allegations