why does pearl jam suck so much?
They don't suck, they just influenced at lot of shit that sucked.
>>66116507
>boring riffs
>generic singer
they kind of do suck
First album was god tier and was copied by every band for the next 10 years.
They then made pure shit for next 30 years.
2nd and 3rd albums r good tho
In 93-94 people would laugh if u said smashing pumpkins or stone temple pilots would be more respected
>>66117792
>people would laugh if u said stone temple pilots would be more respected
They still would
>>66117826
smashing pumpkins are okay at best
stp is slightly better
OP sucks. Pearl Jam have 4 top-tier albums, several good ones, and some shit ones.
>>66118382
nice pleb opinions there m8.
First 3 albums are great.
Next two are ok.
Everything after is pretty ass.
>>66118822
Yield is fantastic though.
PJ fans seem to like self-titled but I could never get into it.
I prefer all albums prior to it.
>>66118382
Smashing Pumpkins are eons better than Pearl Jam, STP is about on par.
>>66118897
all grunge is pleb anyway
>>66119265
t. someone who hasn't listened to any grunge besides Nirvana and Pearl Jam's biggest hits
>>66119265
Grunge is a scene, not a sound. The Smashing Pumpkins don't sound like actual grunge bands, "grunge", or post-"grunge", anyway.
>>66119371
The Pumpkins did kinda ride the grunge wave, though. Lots of songs off of Gish and Siamese Dream are pretty grungy-sounding.