are you rating albums on a 2 point scale

>>66111389
Yes, it's the only non-pretentious way to rate albums. Consider killing yourself if you rate anything with 1-10 or 1-5.

Rubber Soul is a 2/5.

>>66111444
nice double-trips-dubs

>>66111444
those fucking digits goddamn

I agree with most of these but make Help! 1/2 and disc 2 a 2/2

What's the best versions of their discography?
2009 remasters?

>>66111215
why not 0/1? I like your binary system of rating and it makes a lot of sense to me but using 1 and 2 instead of 0s and 1s is faggotry. 0 (lack of positive response to an album), 1 (positive response).

>>66111444
dubs-trips-trips confirms it, this is my new way of rating. 2/2 post lad

>>66113566
why is MMT over there?

>>66111444
I like it. It's a simple way of saying what's bad, good, and great. Thanks for the new rating system.

>>66113566
>AHDN
>6

kys

>HELP
>5

KYS pls

Early beatles is so unappreciated

>>66111215
Do you realize that no album can be 2/2 or 0/2 so the only rating you can give is 1/2?