I can't decide if he's lyrical or not. I see his rhyme schemes and lyrics but there's something so manufactured about all of it.
anybody who says "manufactured" is a tin foil hat
>>66095771
Is it decipherable?
>>66095771
Panda was a legit hit, as far as catchy goes
Timmy Turner doesn't actually count as a rap freestyle which is what it's being passed as
he's an obvious industry plant who's only talent is that he's high energy
>>66095943
How is he an industry plant?
Are you saying the success of Panda is not actually real?
>>66095968
signed to good off of one single
>>66095968
You don't know what an industry plant is
>>66095791
No you're just an idiot.
>>66095983
I'm still convinced this is because Kanye really wanted that track for FSMH Pt. 2.
>>66095983
You could imply the same thing by saying Kanye put his song in his album and also featured him in another song, but do you think Kanye would compromise the quality of his album by trying to promote some unknown random? No, he just liked his music enough to put him on
>>66096008
Panda's beat is not high budget or anything, it's really Desiigner who made the song a hit
If labels such as GOOD could make such a hit out of a random unknown artist they would do it more often
The fact that he's where he is is because he put himself in that position
