Song has Part II after itNo Part I
- Home
- Board: /mu/ - Music
- Reading: Song has Part II after itNo Part I
>Song has "Part II" after it
>No Part I
goddamn those were great lego pieces. shame they eventually filled in those little slots when lego sold out
that mega blok looks like it's making a family guy face >:c
>>66069350
That's a bionicle, you dumb fuck
>>66067732
>>66069370
O the autism
>>66067732
>Album has "Part 2" after it
>Part 1 is just a song on a separate album
>>66069403
Fuck you
>>66067732
jeez louise im enchanted by your pic anon........
>>66067732
>Song has "Part I" after it
>Part II is an entire album released 3 albums later.
is this your favorite album op?
>>66067732
well sometimes the songwriter doesnt like part 1 enough to include it on the album, or it doesn't fit somehow.
>>66069539
If it's not good enough to be on the album then don't call part 2 "part 2"
It's just a meme, they think funny when people say "huh? where's part 1?"
>>66069412
>>66069458
>>66069517
>part 1 is a song
>part 2 is an album
>part 3 doesn't exist
>part 4 is an unreleased song on a rarities release
>>66069622
>Jecht would use his special technique to boost audiences, saying that the name "Mark III" was to hook the crowd and make them return expecting to see Mark I or Mark II, and was given that designation because it hits two opponents and then scores a goal. However, no "Mark I" or "Mark II" ever existed.
>>66069434
Nice... rebuttal?
