Explain Radiohead to Me
- Home
- Board: /mu/ - Music
- Reading: Explain Radiohead to Me
This sounds edgy but I don't get Radiohead and don't think there is anything to "get." Just another production > songwriting group with a nice aesthetic but no real content.
Tell me your thoughts on them. I just want to know what others see in them. Or go ahead and use your maymay arrows and call me faggot or WEW LAD me or memepost your reaction images. I don't really care. Just want opinions.
WEWLAD
>>66043779
If you can't recognize the clever songwriting this band is capable of you're a fucking brain dead moron.
Then again, I probably just got trolled.
faggot
>>66043779
wewlad
>>66043779
wew lad
id recommmend you put the music down and spend a few years studying art and come back to it
wew lad
Shut up and eat!
Too bad, no bon appetit!
its music for people who are too nervous to ask for ketchup at mcdonalds
>>66043957
rolling
>>66043779
assuming this isn't bait
You don't have to think that it's the pinnacle of what alt rock has to offer, but to expand on what this >>66043831 guy says - from a skill standpoint there are many notable features of Radiohead's songwriting that are pretty easily identified. e.g. more complex chord progressions, (relatively) unconventional lyricism, time signatures, instrument choice (talking Kid A / Amnesiac here, not so much before / after).
The fact that you've said
>production > songwriting
seems to incorrectly imply that the creative textures and timbres that Radiohead applies to some of their songs aren't an integral part of the songwriting process.
in short
>wewlad
>>66043957
>>66043997
nice
i hope i get a good one too
>>66043957
she kind of looks like ariel
but even prettier
>>66043779
i agree radiohead is pretty shit, they sound so whiny, and emo. pretty fucking overrated
