Final /mu/core list
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
And finally, here it is: the final /mu/core and sub-/mu/core list. It looks pretty nice. What do you think?
>>65975173
>Final /mu/core list
fuck off holy shit we have had like 35 of these threads in the past 2 weeks alone
what don't you retards understand
>NONE
OF
>YOUR
CHARTS
>WILL
EVER
>STICK
WITH
>THE
REST
>OF
THE
>BOARD
you fucking retards
>>65975173
Why is Gomogenic on there?
I say this as a björkfag but i rarely see Homogenic talked about enough on here for it to be considered /mu/core
>>65975186
this, please fucking go away
>>65975186
The "rest of the board" created the list desu senpai
Close to the Edge is discussed more than a lot of the albums in sub /mu/core.
>>65975173
>only one death grips album
kek
>>65975216
>the rest of the board
you mean the people in ONE thread? this chart will never be used outside of this thread and further inevitable (and futile mind you) discussion of the /mu/core chart
>>65975221
true story, i see it on a daily basis easily
>>65975201
I guess board has many björkfags and they consider it to be her best?
>>65975173
>Trout Mask Replica
>sub-/mu/core
And you are a subcephalic idiot
>>65975255
Seems fair
>>65975246
No, I mean people from ALL OVER the board since the poll was posted to many threads (and the main thread was alive for more than 10 hours) and it shows the general opinion of /mu/tants since 200 people voted on it, contrarian idiot. You may not like the final chart, but it's no reason to diminish its value.
>>65975173
wtf is david bowie doing on that list
>>65975186
>>65975380
>one of the most discussed artists on the board
>wtf is he doing on that list
>>65975173
>having a sub/mu/core section
cmon man, well over half of those albums are /mu/core already, there is no point of this.
>>65975431
this, I never saw the point of having a sub-/mu/core list
>>65975366
whatever
gl with your chart that 1. has albums that are far from /mu/core and 2. will never be posted anyways
i mean if so many people voted, it has to live on... right....?
>>65975528
>1. has albums that are far from /mu/core
/mu/core is decided by the people on the board and the people have decided that albums on the chart are /mu/core albums -- how can you then say that albums on the chart are far from /mu/core? They ARE /mu/core, not far from it.
>i mean if so many people voted, it has to live on... right....?
You are a big fan of North Korea, I assume?
>gl with your chart
How is this my chart? This chart is far from my personal preference or my list of favorite albums or anything, so I don't understand why you are calling it my chart. I didn't decide what goes on the chart, /mu/ decided.
>>65975221
ITCOTCK is much better though
>>65975620
/mu/core is decided by /mu/, but /mu/core isnt what /mu/ likes the most
/mu/core is and always has been what is discussed the most frequently here
i can think of much more fitting replacements for homogenic, emergency & i (this is also one of my favorite albums btw), the sigur ros album, ziggy stardust, and there are also several albums that are definitely debatable as to whether or not they are posted frequently, specifically remain in light although i suppose it makes some amount of sense to leave it on just due to the fact that at one point in time it was discussed quite a bit
>You are a big fan of North Korea, I assume?
i am saying that nobody is going to post this chart. anywhere. in any actual discussion. ever. there are literally hundreds of other /mu/core charts to choose from
>>65975675
>/mu/core is and always has been what is discussed the most frequently here
That is true and I think that voters did have that in mind because on the original thread there were people writing things like "Why does Blonde on Blonde only have 6 votes, kill yourselves" and the people responded "It's a good album but definitely not /mu/core" and /mu/ is aware of that fact.
Also, the important thing is that proponents of some albums really spam them to death and they are spammed by the same people all the time (like 10 same people always posting the same album). It's like saying that Evanescence - Fallen should be /mu/core because that one idiot comes every day and posts a thread about it - but it's just one guy, not many people on the board. But if 79 people read the term "/mu/core" and voted for Emergency & I, that album obviously associates those 79 people to /mu/core and I only respected their opinion, same goes for Homogenic (Björk is probably THE most discussed female artist in the history of the board), Ziggy Stardust (Bowie has been really discussed a lot here, especially in the last year (even when he was alive)), but that Sigur Ros surprised me too. Remain In Light finished in top 10 in two polls and definitely deserves to be there.
>i am saying that nobody is going to post this chart. anywhere. in any actual discussion. ever. there are literally hundreds of other /mu/core charts to choose from
But if everybody has the same opinion like you about these charts, then all /mu/core charts can be just thrown away and forgotten because there will always be people that will react with "Fuck you and your chart, what does it have to do with /mu/, we don't discuss these albums you faggot". There WILL be people writing this. Every. Single. Time. A chart is posted. But that's the problem of those negative people, not of /mu/.
>>65975186
>>65975216
>>65975246
>>65975366
>>65975528
>>65975620
>>65975675
>>65975771
can you stop sucking each other's cock pls?
>>65975173
itaots 9/10
kid a 7/10
mbv 8/10
pet sounds 7/10
mpp 7/10
money store 6.5/10
remain in light 8/10
glow pt2 6/10
tvu&n 7/10
okc 5/10
>>65975864
no one cares
>>65975864
hi scaruffi
>>65975864
>pet sounds 7/10
>kid a 7/10
>glow pt2 6/10
>>65975173
I think there's still no representation for the /genre general/ threads that make up like 40% of the boards user base.
>>65975997
You might want to go look over your Scaruffi lore anon.
His ratings aren't that similar.
>>65975647
This is a supposed to be a list of albums discussed frequently on /mu/. CTTE is discussed much more than Sigur Rós, The Dismemberment Plan and Homogenic.
>>65976077
But no mucore album is a 10/10 by his system
>>65975173
NOTHING CHANGES: The List
>>65976793
no album is a 10/10
Where's Nick Drake? Daft Punk?
Bjork isn't actually listened to by anyone here, it's just the same four people spamming her pictures. They're almost as bad as kpop posters
>>65975173
ITAOTS: 7/10
Loveless: 7/10
spiderland: 5/10
LYSF: 7/10
Kid A: 7/10
MPP: 6/10
Pet sounds: 6/10
OKC: 7/10
RIL: 8/10
TMS: 8/10
TVU&N: 8/10
TGpt2: 7/10
TMR: 7/10
Madvillainy: 9/10
crimson meme: 7/10
SILY: 10/10
SFTB: 8/10
MBDTF: 5/10
American football: 3/10
FAI: 8/10
SAW: 8/10
Illinois: 7/10
Tago Mago: 8/10
Pinkerton - 4/10
Emergency & !: not listened yet
Untrue: 9/10
homogenic: 8/10
TPAB: 5/10
Hospice: 6/10
Ziggy Stardust: 8/10
TBK: 8/10
AB: 7/10
>>65975173
>no Laughing Stock
>no Laughing Stock
>no Laughing Stock
>no Laughing Stock
wew
>MBDTF
>sub /mu/core instead of main /mu/core
How about no
>>65975173
does anyone else think LIE: The Love and Terror cult should be on here? or Jackson C. Frank perhaps? We need to at least introduce newfags to some decent folk. Right? (besides the Glow pt. 2 which isn't TRVE FOLK)
>>65975173
>no person pitch
LOL in the trash you go
STGSTV is more /mu/core than MPP.
Also, why the fuck is Pinkerton there. Not liked, never talked about.
>>65975259
>>65975380
>>65976898
>>65976977
>>65976948
literally no album is perfect, especially not people's 10/10s here
really needs some entry-level noise/drone, since those get a fair amount of discussion/memeage here. Earth 2 at least should be on there
alright im convinced this kid is responsible for this thread
nobody here likes sigur ros besides the underage fagshttps://www.instagram.com/hippocrates.eh/
>>65977067
>bottomless pit a 10/10
>>65977013
>he thinks 10/10 means perfect
How does it feel being this elitist
>>65975186
fpbp
>>65977092
what else would 10/10 mean
>>65977067
See >>65977012 (the most bottom name)
>>65977067
his 10/10s make me want to kill myself
but how do you know this faggot is OP
Here's one that's actually good that we made like a week ago
>>65977120
It's 95% as OP's
>>65977120
emergency and i, animals, blonde on blonde, and kind of blue aren't posted here enough to be mu core IMO
>>65977114
>>65977113
because it's him and his friends spamming the votes.
/mu/ has alot of sub-groups
there's montieboys
the facebook /mu/ group
and this fag
>>65977111
It's literally just a round-up from 9.5 because if you put 9.5 you'll get even more autism thrown at you than if you put 10/10
Get over yourself, kid.
>>65977163
I feel bad for having 2 of the same 10s as him jesus christ
>>65977163
tomatodole telling it like it is
>>65977163
is there a dronier chart? holy shit
>>65977170
well okay. you didn't have to get so triggered
>>65977170
>Get over yourself, kid.
>>65977191
Kek, sounds like a mutant
>>65977170
What's the point of rounding up?
>>65977012
Why is your mom desu not on the chart?
>>65977163
https://instagram.com/p/BHF2RUYjNII/ this is top tier cringe
>>65977333
good question and nice trips
>>65975173
Replace Emergency and I with Velocity Design Comfort
Swap Avalanches with Velvet Underground
>>65977163
whos retarded enough to call themselves montieboys
I thought that we finished this a few days ago?
>>65975173
Are we doing the "new official chart" meme?
http://www.rkursem.com/poll/view.php?id=d739fe9d4a2bede0d
>>65975173
So is it 2013 right now
>>65976875
>pic related
>>65975173
>Kendrick Lamar
S T O P
T
O
P
T H I S
H
I
S
M E M E
E
M
E
HE FUCKING SUCKS, JUST GET THE FUCK OVER IT
