>>65861460
No there isn't, only vinyl hipsterfags who are obsessed with image think that.

why is fucking no one replying to this thread

>>65861460
unless it's a digital only release, why not get the cd?

>>65861833
Because the digital is cheaper

itunes takes a huge cut. buying from bandcamp or straight from the label is better if you actually want to support the artist

>>65861887
fair enough. But with cd's you can still make a high quality digital copy and have a "master" copy in case anything happens to your hard drive or wherever you store it. Just my pref

>>65861460
the main problem with itunes is that your not actually buying music, youre buying a liscence to listen to that music
the problem with that compared to physical copies is that you dont actually own the music you listen to, there was that controversy a couple years ago where a guy wanted to put his itunes collection in his will for his kids but legally he wasnt allowed to
basically itunes owns what you think you own

If they have a vinyl version with the digital copy included yes

>>65861944
Most artists say iTunes is the most profitable.
>>65862202
Just store them on a flash drive and you're good

every now and then i find that the cd version of an album is cheaper than itunes. though if there's an album i want on itunes and its only 5.99, then why not buy it? Most of your cd's are 9.99 plus tax, and the same goes for itunes. i guess its just a preference of physical media or digital media.