PERVERT CONFIRMED PERVERT
Reminder that nothing he did was illegal, just really, really weird
>>65857450
Got a source that's not a tabloid? Anything you post that isn't mirrored on archive.today will be disregarded as fake and gay.
Was this freak even fucking human
>>65857450
so is almost everyone on this miserable Cantonese fish deboning blog. anons here just have the privilege of keeping their vices private
>>65857483
owning CP is illegal
>>65857907
Didn't own anything that could be classed as CP, and the police themselves admitted that.
>>65857949
I wonder how much further his appearance would've altered if he were still alive in the intervening 7 years.
>>65857949
you sir, are in denial
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/michael-jackson-stockpiled-child-porn-animal-torture-photos-according-to-newly-surfaced-report_us_5769644fe4b0a75709b7d847
>>65857949
ever article i read about the whole thing mentioned that his porn stash featured both adults and children?
>>65858011
Didn't you guys read the police pdf? He had loads of "art" books. I thought the tranny porn stuff was the funniest.
>>65858051
lmao
>>65858011
Probably not much different than it looks now fampie.
>>65858019
>>65858026
Yeah, what I'm saying is even though he had collections pictures of nude children, none of it could be legally classed as CP. None of the other stuff was illegal to own either. Doesn't mean it wasn't weird as fuck, but from a legal perspective he dindu nuffin. The fact the people didn't press any CP charges on him show this.
>>65858019
>Huffington Post
Either way yeah the guy was fucked up.
>>65858109
...so if pictures of naked children arent CP, what the fuck is? u fucked in the head m8?
>>65857450
>tfw you will die and people are gonna publish your internet history after ur death to ruin ur legacy so that everyone will know who browsed beastiality, gay furry shit and tentacle futa r34
music for this feel?
>>65858402
so your mother owns CP right? I mean those photos she took at the beach, dude
>>65858402
Not from a legal perspective is the point. Sure it's fucked up he had them, but he wasn't breaking the law by owning them. I'm pretty sure the report said they were pictures from scientific textbooks from the 1800s. I'm not defending him for owning them, because it's weird that he would own them, and I don't want to think what he did while looking at them, but I'm saying from a purely legal perspective he didn't break the law.
so jacko was diddlercore after all
>>65857907
pretty sure raping children is too
>>65858443
>parents taking pictures of their own naked beach children
>2016
im sorry to tell you this anon but your mothers a perv
>>65858443
someone notify the fbi. this dude smells of diddler
>>65858109
>even though he had collections pictures of nude children, none of it could be legally classed as CP
>>65858552
Did you ever doubt it?
>>65858432
hey at least you weren't looking up loli shit
>>65858019
yeah but so do posters on /gif/.
desu im a little shocked he would have that actually.
but i don't know why 4chan would be.
i guess it's just cause it's mike.
>>65857450
REMINDER THE JEWS DID THIS
REMINDER THIS IS A TOTAL FABRICATION TO DISCREDIT HIS LEGACY
REMINDER THE JEWS DID THIS
PIC VERY RELATED, HE KNEW ABOUT (((THEM)))
>>65858109
just cus it was LEGALLY okay doesnt mean its not morally fucked up
>>65858738
I mean, that nigga gave us Billie Jean.
>>65858056
Link to the PDF?
It's been 7 years since he died, literally who cares.
>it's a "kiddy fiddlers and other disgusting degenerates swarm in and defend MJ on the 4chan music board" episode
>>65858833
but the history books are not lying and based upon centuries or research by people who dedicated their life to finding out the truth?
>>65858837
I never argued that it was morally OK. Of course it's fucked up that he owned that stuff. That goes without saying. My point this entire time has been that he didn't break the law by owning any of it though, not that that makes it alright.
>>65858950
yes, that's right. good goy. don't forget the 6 gorillion.
>questionable content couldn't be placed on a dead man's property seven years after his death to discredit him and make a tabloid story
oh wow it's nothing
How do you think people would react to his face if he wasn't the most popular musician of his time?
I mean look at him, he's creepy as fuck.
>>65859055
I always felt a little bit bad for him. He was very obviously really insecure about his looks and the first couple of procedures he had done weren't really that bad but he just went overboard
>>65858432
>tfw you'll die and people will see that you not only looked at that, you looked at crazy shit at the same level as shitting dicknipples
only then will they understand why I was a hermit living in somebody's crawlspace and leeching off their wifi
I have ascended
I'd respect or dignify a single argument in MJ's favor but I realized we live in the country where this happens to people who are against pedophiles: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGmKiq0cJ4o
>>65859661
>I was a hermit living in somebody's crawlspace and leeching off their wifi
This isn't the first time I've seen people on retarded message/image boards online claim to be living in situations identical or similar to this.
Is this some sort of a meme or is this really such a common lifestyle among fuckup NEETS? How many of you fucks are there?
>>65859719
I was joking about my living situation, but if you've ever been to battlestation threads on /g/ you'll see that yes, there are people who live like that
they also tend to horde pissbottles
I would say hate the player, not the game... But it was Quincy Jones who wrote MJ's best stuff. MJ was a fucking idiot desu, but you have to feel bad for him. He was just a kid who was put in this industry to make his parents money, then working for Quincy and making incredible, well selling albums. He probably didn't have a moment at all to collect himself or become self aware.
MJ is just an image. It sucks that he went through so much shit just because he was handsome and could sing and dance. I don't blame him for going insane
>>65859711
I this'd a little
>>65858109
typical libcuck defending degeneracy
>>65859856
degenerate cuck
>>65857450
pedophile confirmed... pic related is pervert confirmed
>>65858109
Those nude pictures of children would be classified as CP if he weren't a celebrity.
>>65858474
Its useless to waste your energy on the kneejerk reactionaries on here.
Case in point is he didnt break the law, so why listen to the news try to spin tis story any other way. Nor did he get sentenced for any child molestion.
If he was of a younger age, maybe he would have just had a collection of hentai instead
>>65861721
how? he was just an ordinary straight guy, you stupid libcuck.
haha this discussion is musical in nature haha
>>65861971
it's about musicians so yeah, fucking cuntsissy fag.
>>65862107
you showed me
>>65858402
is everyone who owns a copy of Nevermind a pedo?
>>65858019
it's literally Larry Clark photography books and shit. such a misleading article
>>65862139
exactly.
>>65858833
crazy fucking drug addict child rapist.
>>65862386
good goy
