/classical/
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music
Post your favorite waltzes, mazurkas, tarantellas, allemandes, etc.
>inb4 how do I into classical?
https://mega.co.nz/#F!mMYGhBgY!Ee_a6DJvLJRGej-9GBqi0A
https://mega.co.nz/#F!lIh3GRpY!piUs-QdhZACFt2hGtX39Rw
https://mega.co.nz/#F!Y8pXlJ7L!RzSeyGemu6QdvYzlfKs67w
https://mega.co.nz/#F!kMpkFSzL!diCUavpSn9B-pr-MfKnKdA
https://mega.co.nz/#F!ekBFiCLD!spgz8Ij5G0SRH2JjXpnjLg
https://mega.co.nz/#F!4EVlnJrB!PRjPFC0vB2UT1vrBHAlHlw
https://mega.co.nz/#F!ygImCRjS!1C9L77tCcZGQRF6UVXa-dA
https://mega.co.nz/#F!il5yBShJ!WPT0v8GwCAFdOaTYOLDA1g
https://mega.co.nz/#F!DdJWUBBK!BeGdGaiAqdLy9SBZjCHjCw
http://crudblud.sjm.so/
>mfw someone says Mozart is better than Bach near me
>>65843883
Additional evidence suggesting Wolfgang endures under-appreciation.
>Post your favorite dance music
patrician neo-classical recs incoming
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFK9N7f-nYA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwkimRuqrU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0TX75q6Y1M
Great thread so far, thanks everyone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdZ2KTPGQS8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUEs6jOVRLg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zne1UO4cpLs
>>65844087
worst post itt
>>65844046
niceme.me
>>65843995
>patrician
>neo-classical
Pick one
>>65844174
Nice to see this website is still alive. Probably the greatest thing of all time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFcbVN9efiU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsReWx9XdNs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmCnQDUSO4I
been listening to a lot of vocal music recently
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PQo_LirQY-k
>>65843968
>Mozart is good
love this meme
>>65845570
Frig off, Poly.
Honestly where do I start listening to classical? I like Debussy so I grabbed the stuff off the mega and I also grabbed the Bach cello suites
What is like, the correct path to absorbing the essentials of classical?
>>65845853
Listen to Mozart.
>>65845853
Listen to what you like but try to find a proper list of the western canon.
>>65845853
ditch mozart and listen to more bach
>>65845570
FPTMIU
>>65845943
I also actually love Dvorak.
>>65845913
Well I mean I plan to
>>65845937
Awesome thanks
>>65845943
Well I mean I plan to
>>65845980
Try Ravel too.
>>65845943
this
>>65845980
You could try Smetana, another Czech.
>>65845129
>tfw more of Hasse's operas have been recorded than Palestrina's masses
palestinians was a meme
ooo saved ,kmonopjhony s8o qhae deprez waas brtrer
>>65846004
Holy shit this is great thanks
>>65847238
>using "des Prez" to refer to Josquin
>no love for polonaises
Sad times /classical/
Today I learned that Munch was a top tier Brahms conductor.
>>65847894
I like them.
Objective ranking of dances coming through:
Dance tier list
>GOAT Tier
Pavan (as practised by the early English composers [and L. Couperin])
>High Tier
Passacaglia, chaconne, siciliano, salon dances (as practised by Chopin)
>Mid Tier
Menuet, scherzo (as practised by the three great classical composers), Allemande, Courante, Gigue (as practised by the French)
>Low Tier
Menuet, scherzo (as practised by anyone else), galantaries [bouree, gavotte, passepeid etc], Allemande, Corrente, Giga (as practiced by the Italians), galliard, tarantella, other national dances
>Trash Tier
Pavan (as practised by anyone else), waltz, salon dances (as practised by anyone else)
>Consider Suicide Tier
Actual dancing
>>65848889
>waltz
>trash tier
>>65847894
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOrOfCDTf7U
do you guys even listen to the music or just masturbate to the girls
In order to refine your tastes you must ditch your music preferences in the classical period. That era is for plebs. A real PATRICIAN would not sully his ears with such doggerel and would instead stick to the far better periods of Romanticism and Baroque.
You must learn to ignore music that was produced soley for the purpose of musicians satisfying their aristocratic owners desire to feel like a rich pompous asshole. All other eras explore literally every other feeling in the world. Unless you want to be an edgy cutter who wants to be buried face down so the world can see your ass, you should avoid this period at ALL costs. It is such a same that "Classical Music" has encompassed both Romantic and Baroque periods, for such high quality music does not deserve to be sullied by its name. Patricians should stay aware but realistic. Plebeians will never change what the word means, but in practice you should only make the rarest exceptions to the rule, if such an exception even existed.
Stay woke.
>>65852138
Why not both?
>>65852494
The latter isn't as pleasurable and detracts from the former.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryJ3336xxhM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5deze4Y8XP4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJcABwKDHcY
>>65852394
>This whole post
How long have you been listening to music? 1 hour?
>>65852394
>...
>>65852394
>music explores feelings
fjcking lol
Can someone upload some Fauré? Looked in all the Mega folders and only found a recording from Samson François's complete EMI recordings.
I'd be particularly interested in any albums that include his Piano Quintet No. 1 in D minor or Piano Quartet No. 1 in C minor.
post musical memes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCcqkFTvwAI
>>65856207
Just search "Faure" on thepiratebay.
>>65857246
Use rutracker.org/forum/index.php
I'm fairly sure pirate bay is pretty much dead now
>>65856207
This will solve all your download needs.
>>65856916
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoaTVgvxm-M
>>65856916
>>65847580
Go listen to his piano concerto in g major, that piece is sick.
>>65843883
Couldn't agree more.
>>65845853
There are so many great works by Bach. Here's a list of BWV numbers. You can just look these up on youtube, every piece has a different BWV number.
Secular:
BWV 1052
BWV 1053
BWV 1054
BWV 1041
BWV 1042
BWV 1055
BWV 998
BWV 565
BWV 578
Some religous works:
BWV 140
BWV 142
BWV 244
BWV 232
BWV 27
>>65852394
>tfw i unironically agree with this shitpost
I am looking for a piece of music. I don't remember anything other than it sounded like a highly unique form of twelve-tone serialism and the video has a crude painting of planets in the solar system against a white background.
>>65843968
I agree. Wolfgang Rihm is highly overlooked
>>65861613
whether or not this is the piece, you should listen to WTC I: fugue in b minor
>>65861943
no, its not Bach and I am aware of that piece and pretty much any major work by the "B"ig Three. The piece was some contemporary guy. Not really famous at all.
>>65862100
FURTHER PROOF
U
R
T
H
E
R
P
R
O
O
F
Where do I start with Prokofiev?
>>65861613
Gustav Holst the planets?
>>65862218
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLT55kPIFCo
>>65862326
No, that is a TERRIBLE piece of music
>>65862218
I recommend symphony 6
>>65862449
Oh, come on. It's decent modern classical at worst. No need to impress anyone here by exaggerating.
>>65862449
>>65862655
Anything written by a guy who cant play a piano is bound to be mediocre. But just listen to it. A few movements are fine like Mercury but even the Keystone movement, everyone's favorite Jupiter is just a formless saccharine mess.
>>65862809
What's so great about Mercury?
What are some première recordings that I can hear?
>>65863061
Its not great, I said as much already. Its just the least offensive movement in an overall self-indulgent piece by a sub-Vaughan-Williams tier composer.
>>65862809
>>65863275
If only your opinion was objective fact. Go write a blog post about Bach being the greatest artist of all time.
>>65863359
No, because that would be Mozart of course ;^)
