Björk>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Grimes
Is this even debatable
Nope.
She's better in every way
why compare them? grimes career isn't even half a decade long yet
this is such an immature and irrelevant comparison to make
what is a bjork?
>>65841229
Because grimefags are the ones comparing them in the first place. It isn't a Grimes thread if there isn't some sort of Björk vs. Grimes argument going on.
But anyways, everyone knows Björk is better and anyone who says otherwise is in denial.
>>65841306
this
>>65841347
this thread kind of sucks u know
>>65841347
ive never seen grimesfags bring up bjork. its always salty bjorkfags that try to start shit
another björk
this one is my favorite björk. definitely better then grimes.
>>65841183
>Common things between Grimes & Bjork:
>weird voices
>quirky, playful personalities
>strange fashion sense
>interesting live shows
>acclaimed electronic music
>dedicated fanbase
>obscure albums before the proper breakthrough albums (Grimes has Geidi Primes & Halfaxa, Bjork has S/T album from 1977)
>eclectic music taste.
Grimes = the new Bjork. The great Bjork of the '90s, not the boring one.
>>65841229
Grimes started making music in 2008. 8 years career is respectable and she's still on an ascending trend.
>>65841445
Differences between bjork and grimes:
>Bjork is talented
>>65841394
That's right. The Bjork fanboys raided the Grimes threads and trolled them. They started it all, envious by her success.
>>65841485
differences between björk and grimes.
>björk is a tree
>>65841485
Grimes:
>singing
>writing lyrics
>composing songs
>producing all her music
>drawing her own artwork
>playing all her instruments
>directing and editing most of her videos
>total control over her art
Grimes is not talented is a shitty meme, my friend.
>>65841524
differences between björk and grimes:
>grimes is a sewer rat
>>65841499
oooh, I feel like i'm in kindergarten again. thanks.
>>65841547
That's nasty. Grimes is an angel.
>>65841544
She does all that, but doesn't mean she does it well
>>65841394
ur very lame
Kate Bush > both
>>65841229
and she already blew it
>comparing memes
>>65841583
That's right, but lots of critics and millions of fans think that she's done more than well. Just the simple fact that she's discussed so often means that her work is relevant and incites strong opinions.
>>65841823
Popularity =/= talent
>>65841939
Then talent = ? Prove it that she's not talented.
>>65841939
Are you dumb? There is nothing about talent
>>65842009
she's talented but its not necessarily something i (not the person you quoted btw) enjoy listening to
>>65842065
Because subjectivity. Fair enough if you don't enjoy listening to.
