are you even making an attempt ?
>TVU on the cover
If the 1001 albums I must hear are as mediocre as TVU&N, i'll pass.
>>65649529
I gurantee it's 99% dadrock
>>65649529
I don't know, give me a link to a pdf and I might try. I'm not dishing out 20-40 bucks to see a list, when there dozen other list for free. Hell the Rolling Stones list is free.
>>65649585
https://www.discogs.com/lists/1001-Albums-You-Must-Hear-Before-You-Die/18222
Yes, I listen to I'm up to pic related (well, Late For The Sky actually). That list also includes the Rolling Stone 500, every 33 1/3 book and every Grammy AOTY, plus recs from family and friends.
>>65649585
Try looking, m8
http://www.rocklistmusic.co.uk/steveparker/1001albums.htm
>>65649529
I sincerely hate those fucking books.
>>65649529
One of my uncle bought this book and the movie one and he's worshiping it like it is the bible
>>65649647
list aint too bad desu
>>65649650
>Kiss
>Aerosmith
>Rush
>Ramones
Well 1001 is a large number...
>>65649650
>limp bizkit
no
>>65649529
I found an RYM list of this and spent an entire lecture checking off how many I had already heard. It was somewhere around 1/3rd of the list. There are some questionable entries in the 2000s that have me convinced I'll never hear all 1001
>>65649884
There are highly questionable suggestions throughout the entire book. Combined with a ton of great albums. Which of course makes the book fucking useless considering what it was made for.
A person who doesn't know music would have no way of knowing if the recommendation is awful or extremely good. The only way to make a book like that is to choose the absolute best albums.
They managed to come up with a lot of great albums when they had 1001 chances to. Marcel could have done that when he was 10 years old. He could have done it when he was the Wizard of Geography.
>>65649650
>Metal Machine Music
fucking kek
>>65649991
i didn't even see that
why dont you make a book like this, /mu/?
>>65649650
>stevie wonder
>eric clapton
Told ya. Dadrock
>>65650022
good idea
fill it with whitehouse-type albums and post it on r/music
>>65649647
>Kid Rock
>Britney Spears
>2000s U2
>Limp Bizkit
>>65650052
all good bands
>>65649991
I added that to the list myself
>>65649650
>Kiss
>Metal Machine Music
>Loretta Lynn
>So Many Dad Rock albums
>Randy Newman
>No King Crimson
>Post-60's Dion
>Elton John
Shit list, not even bothering.
>the colour of spring
>no spirit of eden
>no laughing stock
>>65650081
>>65650096
This is just my 100 for this year. Larks' Tongues in Aspic was at the end of the previous 100. No Red or S&BB tho
>>65650144
is that supposed to be a defense of the list?
>>65650169
just responding to the "no King Crimson" bit
>>65650186
we don't care
your list is retarded. unless you want us to make you a far better one there is nothing to discuss
>>65650228
use your words tommy
>>65649647
I've listened and/ or own 37 of the albums on that list
>>65650307
>coming out as a pleb
bold
Funny seeing this book on /mu/. I own a copy, but I guarantee you neither mine nor any list posted online is the most recent edition. No way to tell because the book isn't on the publisher's website.
>>65650320
Fite me irl fggt
>1001 x's to y before you die
how about 1001 coffee table book ideas which don't suck
>>65649650
>No Osamu Kitajima
>No Alusa Fallax
>No Apoteosi
>No Museo Rosenbach
>No PFM
This list is severely lacking.
>>65650052
Don't talk shit about Britney bitch
>>65651617
Who?
Get your niche pretentious shit away from me.
It seriously can't be that good if nobody's heard of it.
>>65651909
>"It seriously can't be that good if nobody's heard of it."
>>65651960
I mean honestly though c'mon.
I'm willing to be more people think The Beatles are better than what ever obscure bullshit you pulled out your ass.
>>65652095
Have you actually tried to, you know, llsten to the fucking bands before spouting shit like this? try to leave you bubble and listen to something different once in your life.
About the relative quality of the Beatles, i can´t say, they play absolutely different styles, its like comparing apples and oranges.
>>65651909
>i don't know what this is so it's bad
>>65652188
Post some of your favorite songs of those bands, I'll listen to them when I wake up.
Either will reply if I like any of them or if the thread dies I'll just make a new thread about the band I like.
Not that asshat btdubs.
>>65649584
This and don't they only go up to 2005 or something like that?
>>65652248
Really, you should listen to their albums, but ok.
Alusa Fallux - Carta Crbone
Osamu Kitajima - Masterless Samurai
Apoteosi - Prima Realta
Museo Rosenbach - Degli uomin
Premiatta Forneria Marconi - La Carrozza Di Hans
>Not that asshat btdubs.
What do you mean?
>>65652369
Was just going to listen to their songs to see what album I would listen to first.
"btdubs" is colloquial for "by the way", and asshat as in the anon that was calling obscure music pretentious.
>>65652394
Well, in my defense, those are some of the best known bands by the prog fans (with the exception of Osamu Kitajima who is indeed pretty obscure).
>>65649960
yeah but its not titled "1001 albums you should like" Its a very balanced book. Sure theres some dadrock but theres also almost every mucore album and tons of submucore too. If you go thorough this book you should a decent amount of good music regardless of your taste.
What happened to that girl who was reviewing every album in the 1001 albums list after her first listen. Pretty sure there was a thread about it
i wonder if omar or christina completed the set
>>65653463
RADIOHEAD BTFO!!!
>>65651617
Spotted the italian
>>65653521
It was a thread in the archive but i can't remember the name of it. I think she ended up quitting it altogether because of it.
>>65653521
Anyone got a link tot he full thing?
>>65649529
guarantee you Aunt Sally isn't in there
burnt everything - it's all go
>>65653521
Cancer
>>65649529
Bathory - Hammerheart
Bathory - Nordland I&II
...
Bathory - Nordland III&IV ;_;
>>65651909
>Who?
>Get your niche pretentious shit away from me.
>It seriously can't be that good if nobody's heard of it.
t. reddit
>>65653521
not a big radiohead fan but what the actual hell
>>65650047
Can someone please do this
>>65649837
>The Ramones up there with all that shit wankrock
>>65652534
Only rational post ITT
Although, yes, there are a few glaring omissions. Spirit of Eden, for example
>>65650096
what's wrong with randy newman??
I have the finnish version of that and I got it for like 5e. Its fun to read a little every now and then
>>65649650
How did you like Late for the Sky?
>>65653521
>Karma Police is the only song that I enjoyed
Not even into Radiohead anymore but Karma Police is one of the worst songs on OKC.
>>65651617
Actually the only right person in this autistic thread
>>65651909
>I'm ignorant and I like to show my ignorance to the world
I have this book, it's okay. But the bigger the band the bigger space they get on the page, it's not a competition for quality but rather for fame.
>>65659070
It was very uninteresting to me. Not my thing.
>>65660459
/mu/ doesn't seem to really understand anything from the 70s
>>65660637
Eh, maybe. Kimono My House is a 4.5 for me
>>65650096
King Crimson is definitely there.
>>65652534
yeah, it's a good book: basically 1001 pop/rock essentials. I'd say ~15% is shit, but you have to list shit like Limp Bizkit, TLC, Scissor Sisters etc. because it was successful/influential
>>65649529
Why do people think TVU+Nico is so good? Quite laughable.
>>65649581
This
>>65661730
Well you're going to be laughing a very long time at the thousands of bands they influenced
>>65649529
>Buckley, Tim – Greetings from LA
why
>1001 /mu/-approved Albums You Must Hear Before You Commit Sudoku
W H E N
>>65652411
>prog fans
Prog is almost as bad as ska. Opinion discarded
>>65649529
I will always make an attempt to listen to as many albums as I can.
I don't give a fuck about any of those lists, though, I'll listen to what I want to.
>>65652275
I think Get Behind Me Satan is the most recent album, so yeah 2005-ish.
>>65662218
Can it just be 1000 albums?
>294/1001
welp, I tried…
>>65649786
fucking kek
>>65662218
this actually sounds like a kind of ok idea
>>65662311
They've released several revised editions, not sure what's the most decent but one definitely included It's Blitz and The Next Day. Problem is the revised lists never show up online, only in the physical books.
I swear to God, only rockists do this shit.
>tfw Scaruffi was right
MY LIST
1001 THINGS YOU MUST LISTEN BEFORE YOU DIE
1-go here 1001 times (
http://rateyourmusic.com/misc/random )
1.1-re enter the link again if you get the same release more than one release in a row
>>65652095
>I'm willing to be more people think The Beatles are better than what ever obscure bullshit you pulled out your ass.
By that logic alien technology (assuming it exist of course) will automatically be worse than human tech, since most here (actually 100% of human population) dont know it exist.
>>65662218
So basically just a monster version of that /mu/core chart?
>>65650047
>fill it with whitehouse-type albums and post it on r/music
a list like that would NEED to have at least one harsh noise albums
would need to have at least one of each one of those genres or subgenres.
grindcore
minimalism (talking about phillip glass kind of stuff not glitch, minimal techo..)
lowercase
tonefield
drone doom metal
dark ambient
ambient
field recordings
onkyo
speedcore
sound collage
free jazz
>>65665008
4kbps version of Loveless too.
>>65650026
DON'T TALK ABOUT STEVIE WONDER LIKE THAT
>>65651909
PFM are actually really good though
like they're really fucking good man listen to them sometime for real
>>65653521
>I'm all for music expansion and growth, but when a band expands and grows musically, I really can't stand it.
>>65665101
>4kbps version of Loveless too.
On my post, I said only the genres that would need to have at least one song on the list.
But there are some stuff that arent genres that would need to be on the list.
Like one album that dont use 12 tone equal temperament.
One album that have *waves, that arent soundwaves (like plasmawave, seismic waves....) , converted to soundwaves just by assuming the graphic you have on the data you recorded is a soundwave one, without doing extra edits.
An album with just white noise, must be on the list too
>>65665301
Also non-existing albums, just randomly generate artist name, album name and year.
