IR > Kid A > Amnesiac > OKC > AMSP > Bends > HTTT > TKOL > PH
>TKOL that low
Not only are you a massive pleb with basic af taste, you're wrong
Really bad ranking.
Kid A = OKC >>>> IR > Amnesiac > TKOL > Bends > HTTT > PH
OKC > The Bends > Kid A > Amnesiac > IR > TKOL > PH > HTTT
>>65636997
IR > Kid A > Amnesiac > TKOL > OKC > AMSP > Bends > HTTT > PH
>>65636997
Amnesiac > okc > kid a > IR > AMSP > HTTT = TKOL > the bends > Pablo honey
OKC > Bends = side A of TKOL > Amnesiac > HTTT > Kid A > AMSP = side B of TKOL > Showbiz > In Rainbows > stepping on a beer can without shoes on and having the tab go through your foot > Pablo Honey
>>65636997
Pleb
>>65637123
Nostalgia goggles
Objectively speaking, Kid A > Amnesiac > AMSP > HTTT > TKOL > In Rainbows
Their pre-Kid A work is just bad
>>65636997
OKC = IR > Kid A > AMSP > Amnesiac > HTTT > TKOL > The bends > PH
>>65637094
>~le TKOL is actually good guise but only patrishians know that xDD
End yourself
they're all pretty lame. PF derivative babble.
>>65637268
>One of the defining albums of the 90's is bad
Weuw lad
>>65636997
KidA>Bends>IR>OKC>Amnesiac>HTTT>TKOL>PH
haven't listened to AMSP enough yet to place it
>>65637300
>I allow others to dictate what I like and dislike
Wewin even harder than you m8
Amnesiac > HTTT > Kid A = OKC > TKOL = IR > The Bends > AMSP > PH
>>65637371
You should atleast be able to recognize it. I don't really like Kid A but I won't deny it's one of their better albums
Kid A > OKC > IR > TKOL > HTTT = Amnesiac > AMSP > The Bends > PH
>>65637371
>like and dislike
Not what we are discussing. Try again.
OKC > Kid A > AMSP > Amnesiac > IR > HTTT > TKOL > Bends > PH
>>65636997
Whats the diffrence i listen to all albums either way
Just posting to reaffirm that In Rainbows is their best work.
>in rainbows near the top
opinion disregarded
Kid A (essentially created a new genre, completely ahead of its time) > OK Computer > IR > AMSP > Amnesiac = The Bends > HTTT > TKOL > Pablo Honey
>>65637710
That's because you were 12 in 2008 and just discovered "real music"
>>65637745
>Radiohead invented Krautrock
WOW
Lol pleb
>>65637745
>Kid A (essentially created a new genre, completely ahead of its time)
IR=HTT=Amnesiac>The Bends>OKC=Kid A>AMSP>PH (+ points for having You, Blown Out and Anyone Can Play Guitar)>TKOL (still haven't gotten into it, but maybe sometime I will start liking it)
>>65637745
I mean Kid A is my favorite but it didn't really invent anything, it's just a great work, blend of ideas, and great change in direction for the band.
>>65637570
>music is objective!
>>65636997
close
Kid A > IR > (potentially AMSP) > OKC > Amnesiac or Bends > everything else
>>65637745
lol
I agree with the ranking but
lol
>>65636997
The King of Limbs > Amnesiac > Kid A > In Rainbows > A Moon Shaped Pool > Ok Computer > Hail to the Theif > The Bends > Pablo Honey
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4MU4f9RuHQ
Kid A>In Rainbow>Amnesiac>OK Computer>Moon Shaped Pool>Bends>Hail to the thief>The King of Limbs>Pablo Honey.
Is Radiohead deep or derp music?
So, the consensus appears to be that Radiohead is getting worse as a band.
Kid A>OKC>>AMNESIAC=IR>TB>AMSP>TKOL>HTTT>PH
>>65638195
I don't think they're getting worse, just getting old. You can't ask them to keep making a new In Rainbows every 4 years, slowly but surely their music is mellowing down. They're noticeably getting tired but still make pretty solid stuff.
Kid A > OKC > AMSP > IR > Amnesiac > HTTT > TKOL > PH
>>65638299
The Bends?
>>65638195
Eh, I wouldn't say worse. AMSP is fantactic album, some people even consider it an equal to IR. Besides, it's better than TKOL, so there's that.
>>65637921
How is it not?
here we gooo
Kid A > OKC > IR > Amnesiac > AMSP > Bends > HTTT > TKOL > PH
almost there op
You are fucking wrong
OKC > IR > AMSP > Kid A > Amnesiac > HTTT > Bends > TKOL > PH
Kid A > Amnesiac > OKC > AMSP > The Bends = In Rainbows > HTTT > TKOL > Pablo
get ready for OBJECTIVE
de benz > pubba hunna > HTTT (how to train ur thief) > in raybans > kid a > OKCupid > amsp
thats is theres your list
>>65637268
This guy gets it, people need to realise 90's radiohead is crap.
>>65639484
>crap
>>65639484
>90s Radiohead is crap
Fuck off; this isn't autismchan
>>65636997
TKoL > AMSP > everything else
>>65638774
It's sensory data. You can't say red is objectively a better color than blue. You can't say certain soundwaves are objectively better than others. Everyone just has different tastes.
>>65639484
Yeah okay computer has some good songs but that's about it
>>65639795
>data
Which is objective
>soundwaves
Can objectively be measured by Hz and dBs
>Yeah okay computer has some good songs but that's about it
What instrument do you play again?
>>65639902
Stop trying to look smart you fucking twat, holy shit, how are you trying to argue that the pitch and volume of something makes it objectively better than anything else
HTTT is the best actually
>>65639946
>objectively better than anything else
Quote me where I said that.
>>65640006
My initial argument was that you can't call music objectively better than other music. Are you taking pride in the fact that you lack basic reading comprehension and started arguing a totally unrelated point?
>>65640048
>My initial argument was that you can't call music objectively better than other music.
Nice backpedaling
What's the point of comparing their albums, again? You guys are retarded.
>>65640135
Because nearly everyone here is musically illiterate and can't discuss the actual music. So instead they just state their favorite and rank the albums.
>>65640121
>Nice backpedaling
Nice acknowledgment of defeat
>>65640194
>Nice acknowledgment of defeat
Not really. Here the clain was that music was not objective. See >>65637921 and >>65638774
You then had to change your music to ass a subjective value judgement ("better") to the claim. That's backpedlaing.
Music is objective. It exists as waveforms measured in hz and dBs.
Please keep up.
>>65640263
Holy autism, you clearly misinterpreted the original post
>>65640356
Which post?
>>65636997
Put Amnesiac between the Bends and HTTT and you've got it
>>65640413
This >>65637921 is in response to >>65637570, which is clearly trying to argue that this thread is about objectively ranking albums as better or worse. I genuinely don't see what's so hard to understand about this.
>>65640263
not party to this debate but heres my two cents:
>Music is objective. It exists as waveforms measured in hz and dBs.
this is like saying visual art is objective because it exists in measured quantities of chroma, value and hue. This is true, just like how waveforms can be measured in hz and dbs, but making any analysis based on this beyond stating quantitative observations (eg. electroneering is the loudest song on OKC) is opinion based.
Ergo, music is highly subjective, much the same as visual art. lets go back to making stupid ass lists now. I thought the whole 'objective' line in the title was just an invitation to be cheeky and facetious
>IR ranked as #1
how to spot a nu-male 101
>>65640477
>This >>65637921
No, I interpreted it correctly. You stated ">music isn't objective" but then changed your argument to "objectively better"
Maybe you misunderstood me.
>>65640506
>>65640506
>his is like saying visual art is objective because it exists in measured quantities of chroma, value and hue
Correct.
>lets go back to making stupid ass lists now
How's your music coming along?
Kid A > AMSP > Amnesiac > TKOL >>> In Rainbows >>> OKC > The Bends = Pablo Honey
>>65640550
You must be fun to hang out with
Okc > kid a > amnsc = ir > amsp > tkol > httt > bends > ph
Objective:
1. Kid A - 10
2. OK Computer - 10
3. In Rainbows - 10
4. Hail to the Thief - 9.4
5. A Moon Shaped Pool - 9.1
6. Amnesiac - 8.8
7. The King of Limbs - 8.7
8. The Bends - 8.2
9. Pablo Honey - 7.2
>>65640657
Nice acknowledgment of defeat
Muse>>>Coldplay>>>>>>>>>literally dog shit>>>>>>>>Radiohead
Check these objective ranking lads
>>65640930
TOO OBJECTIVE
DESTROYED BY OBJECTIVITY
>>65639902
>Can objectively be measured by Hz and dBs
and Hz and dBs define how good or how bad something is?
>>65638324
Fuck I forgot the bends
Kid A > OKC > AMSP > IR > Amnesiac > The Bends > HTTT > TKOL > PH
>>65641119
>Hz and dBs define how good or how bad something is?
Quote me where I said that.
Objective ranking. This is not opinion.
HTTT > OKC > AMSP > Kid A > The Bends > Amnesiac > In Rainbows > Pablo Honey > TKOL
>>65641206
What are all of the rankings in this thread objectively based on?
>>65640664
>HTTT and AMSP both 9s
>The Bends lower than TKOL
>Pablo Honey anything higher than a 3
I know it's your opinion but holy shit is it terrible
>>65637273
Fuck off, Will Toledo!
>>65641287
>What are all of the rankings in this thread objectively based on?
Quote me my rankings and I'll tell you.
>>65637265
>ranking of "thomas yorke and the radio heads" albums
>Showbiz
