2016 Hype: Swans vs. Avalanches

wut

>>65503005
nice picture

neither will be aoty

>>65503133
What's going to steal the show?

they'll probably both be good but to me the significance of this avalanches release blows swans out of the water

i'm much more pumped for something along the lines of an SILY 2.0 rather than what is probably essentially going to be the seer 3.0

>listenstoswansonce.jpg

its gonna be the avalanches bruv

>>65503176
True. I think there's some significance with Glowing Man being [this version of] Swans' last output, though its 2 year wait doesn't hold a candle to 16.

>>65503005

why not just like both?

>>65503239
80s swans vs 90s swans vs 10s swans
Go

File: morethanthefairy.jpg (49KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

49KB, 720x720px

>>65503162
New Death Grips

>>65503446
There's only room for one Frankie.

But really, I didn't say that that's not an option. I know I'm very excited for each for very different reasons.

>>65503476
As one of many plebs who only started listening to Swans post-reformation, I'm partial to later outputs quite a bit. Then SFTB and all other 90s Swans. Then 80s. But it's all good.

>>65503509
No memes in this thread please.

>>65503563
>swans
>avalanches
>not memes

>>65503600
I'm aware that Swans probably has more of a p4k fanbase than The Avalanches, but statistically speaking Death Grips completely dwarfs both as far as suburban preteen fans are concerned.