Rational ecstasy edition
post latest genres
>>65469577
>>65469617
>implying that's you
>>65469850
>>65469617
I can see you samefagging lol
>>65469870
wdhmbt?
>>65469893
well thats pretty wierd since there's only you and me here
>>65469415
Ah the good old days...
>>65469577
>>65469617
>>65469850
>>65469870
>>65469893
>>65469921
all of these are me t b h
>>65469965
lol
>Replies: 9
>Posters: 3
yo you guys are on fucking weed
>>65470134
fuck off sal, this thread is for rym users
>>65470134
op posted his genres and then pretended to be someone else butthurt about it
pretty lame imo
>>65470159
no this thread is fo
>>65470166
yeah that's pretty fucking gay
Best user who made their first account in 2016?
>>65470232
Contradiction in terms.
why can't I rate any more? I deleted all my ratings recently, and whenever I get to re-doing them, I rate maybe 4 or 5 releases before removing them through dissatisfaction and mild frustration
I need a solid system but this is an ongoing problem
>>65470232
Honestly no good or even interesting users have signed up since probably 2012-13
this is legitimately good
is this a sign that I've gone full retard RYM user
>>65470685
W H O I S T H E G I R L:)
H
O
I
S
T
H
E
G
I
R
L
:
)
>>65470685
This is not really her, right guys? R-right?
>>65470702
I signed up in late 2015 and already have users not just in these threads but across RYM talking about me.
>>65470824
theyre probably talking about how much of a lil embryo you are
https://rateyourmusic.com/~HUnewm
Share me your favorite gothic or industrial music, and I'll share something back
>>65470824
Doesn't mean you're a good user tho, plenty of autists and morons generated discussion on here and the RYM forums
>>65470824
t. montie
Do you want to have good taste in classical music, but are discouraged by the avant-teens who ruin the charts for everyone? Do not worry: I'm here with 16 easy starter albums featuring the most important musical minds of the past century. No need to thank me!
(will expand on request)
>>65469415
Does anyone have the original "rational ecstasy" quote saved?
>>65471051
you're making it too obvious now boldy, calm it down a bit
https://rateyourmusic.com/~randomforest
rec me 'good' music
>>65471051
those are some interesting choices
>>65471225
I'm not exactly trying to hide.
>>65471256
I mean it's just the closest teleological vision of the past century. Can't encompass everything though; particularly missing New Complexity and Futurism.
>visits exitsense's profile once
https://rateyourmusic.com/~portraits
>>65471515
including riley, reich, and glass is excessive. the last three entries make no sense. futurism carries even less historical weight than new complexity, which is already suspect. i don't understand why you would approach it from a teleological perspective...
>>65471102
>>65471615
>including riley, reich, and glass is excessive
Except for the fact each had very different approaches to minimalism the same way with Webern, Boulez, and Stockhausen with serialism.
>the last three entries make no sense.
t. person who doesn't listen to classical music
I won't respond to b8 anymore
>>65471611
>tfw I made this post initially
>tfw some guy now posts it in every thread
>tfw a meme used by one person is worse than never creating a meme at all
Is Pavement avant-certified?
>>65471696
Fucking kek. Is this real?
>>65471734
Do you know what the prefix "avant" means, or do you just enjoy sounding relatively informed?
>>65470736
>is this a sign that I've gone full retard RYM user
yes
time to reevaluate your life
>>65471760
>what is context
Yes, I do.
>>65471700
sure, but it's yet to be seen that minimalism will have a lasting impact comparable to serialism. it's plain and simple recency bias that you'd include so much minimalism.
>>65471734
don't think so
>>65471864
>but it's yet to be seen that minimalism will have a lasting impact comparable to serialism.
you know aside from literally the past 50 years
you don't know shit kid
https://rateyourmusic.com/~ElectricLizard
who /jadedandtired/ here?
>>65471917
minimalism that has begot more conceptually indistinguishable minimalism. the chart is just an extension of your taste - don't mistake it for an objective account of the development of 20th century classical music
>>65472014
Minimalism is fully accountable for the rise of atmosphere/drone based compositions over the past 50 years, undeniably.
>>65472054
even if that were true, it would just mean that they are a subset of the potentialities expressed by minimalism, not the advancement of a teleological vision, if that's indeed the criteria you considered.
>>65470685
HOW
why did boldfaure delete his account
>>65471102
>>65472218
i feel like this was sent to HipNorwegian
>>65472218
that's all reasonable actually
>>65472218
what a fucking faggot lmao
>>65472218
>you're
>>65472127
Hence why I said "closest" and not THE teleological timeline, which doesn't exist and cannot exist
>>65472183
because RYM is a shit site
>>65472257
i remember seeing this when it was posted. it was on melez102's shoutbox
>>65472309
your argument that minimalism -> drone contradicts the strive toward a teleological explanation though. you are ignoring a lot of composers and styles in favor of more minimalism. if that's your taste then fine, but you often post here as though your taste in classical is somehow definitive.
>>65472354
https://rateyourmusic.com/collection/melez102/stag/silence+is+%28not%29+sexy/
what did he mean by this?
>>65472372
Do you listen to classical music at all? Because your denial of minimalism leading to drone seems to make me think that you certainly don't listen to a lot of classical music.
>>65472354
>>65472414
this guy also made op's pic
is he the avant-teen killer?
>>65472218
please tell me the "you're" was ironic
is the pro-ana stuff on daisiesfree's tumblr ironic?
>>65472459
https://rateyourmusic.com/collection/randomforest/strm_h/classical+music/1
I don't deny that minimalism is a large influence on drone, no.
>>65472585
Ratings are fucking meaningless, don't show me your fucking ratings kid.
>>65472218
what's the context behind this?
>>65472554
link?
>>65472737
>Do you listen to classical music at all?
would you rather me list every composer I've ever listened to?
judging by the uninformed bullshit you post here frequently, I've heard a much broader selection of 20th century classical music. Hence why I don't champion one style (minimalism) over other contemporary movements simply because I'm more familiar with it.
>>65472803
>judging by the uninformed bullshit you post here frequently, I've heard a much broader selection of 20th century classical music.
Oh for fuck's sake don't tell me you're the faggot claiming Hecker is a valuable artist
>>65472803
>>65472907
There's a big difference between a person who listens to Radeluscu and Eastman and the person who studies classical music and knows what's important music
>>65472932
radulescu and eastman aren't comparable
you must look at music in terms of internet fanbases which is really sad
>>65472907
I think the opposite, actually.
>>65472932
I'm not the former and you aren't the latter, what's your point?
>>65472974
I wasn't saying they are comparable, but neither of them are significant composers.
Eastman was outshone by Reich/Glass and Radulescu by Murail/Grisey
>>65472976
I'm certainly the latter compared to everyone else on RYM.
Except I'm sure for the two other educated people on the website who I have yet to meet.
>>65473005
>I'm certainly the latter compared to everyone else on RYM.
>Except I'm sure for the two other educated people on the website who I have yet to meet.
this is priceless
>>65473032
It's not wrong, that's the beautiful thing.
boldfaure more like boldfailure
>>65473005
grisey is better than radulescu, but murail is not.
eastman is pretty irrelevant, yes
>>65473100
Close enough, we can agree to disagree.
>>65473083
Not this again
I just find it poetic and beautiful that someone, in an effort to prove they know something about music, posted their ratings.
Goes right to the core about what a shit website RYM is, exactly why I deleted my profile.
boldfaure why do you still post in these threads? i thought you had moved on. shouldn't you be posting in /classical/ or something?
https://rateyourmusic.com/~hittinbills
recs n friends welcome
>>65473162
/classical/ is fucking awful and really just as bad as RYM
RYM is obsessed with people who listen to tons of obscure stuff that isn't very good in order to look authoritative to losers
/classical/ is obsessed with people who listen to tons of obscure recordings of 200 year old compositions while knowing nothing about modern music.
>>65473160
all you asked him was a factual question, whether or not he listens to classical music. how is linking you to a list of classical music he has listened to not the proper answer? granted he should've filtered it to "western classical music" to get rid of the BS
>>65473223
atleast you still have reddit, bud
>>65473238
When I ask "Do you listen to classical music" I don't want a rating list of music they heard in the background while posting about redpilling on shitty fucking users
I want them to demonstrate a knowledge of the music
>>65473185
>animals as leaders 5/5
listen to chimp spanner nigga
>>65473264
reddit's shit because they don't allow discussion, it's just downvote and then run away
>>65473223
i think you mean /mu/ rym does.
a ton of rym is just old people who couldnt give less of a shit about what people think of their taste
>>65473300
>i think you mean /mu/ rym does.
Yeah I do
but that's because I don't use RYM proper, because it's a bad website for that
>>65473287
>chimp spanner
thanks, will check out.
>>65473223
antigona, zizekian, etc are scholars who have better knowledge of classical music than you
>>65473282
you can listen to classical music and still not know anything about it
your question was poor
>>65473334
>scholars
Defend this claim.
And again, I didn't deny people know more than me. I haven't visited their profiles though.
>>65473317
honestly discogs is way better to catalog and find obscure releases than rym but rym has a more streamlined rating and discussion platform, also its easier to show off ie. what mu rym does
>>65473223
>RYM is obsessed with people who listen to tons of obscure stuff that isn't very good in order to look authoritative to losers
no, people like you project that attitude onto random strangers who never try to act superior, thus breeding dozens of new accounts that try to emulate that pseudo-superiority for attention. RYM is only bad for those who can't control their impulses and develop an obsession.
>>65473238
I doubt any answer I gave would have been sufficient anyways.
>>65473282
I'll ignore the strawman but more importantly your arguments always boil down to "I study music". I've never seen a post by you that demonstrates knowledge, just egotistical ramblings fed by delusion.
>>65473370
>no
Well clearly you don't go to these threads often.
>but more importantly your arguments always boil down to "I study music". I've never seen a post by you that demonstrates knowledge, just egotistical ramblings fed by delusion.
Yeah I can understand how an ignorant would think that.
>>65473370
best post itt
>>65469577
I don't understand how this works, I must have heard one or two "Lo-fi Indie" albums
>>65473399
see, you have no substance to offer in return. this is the equivalent of a child saying "nuh-uh!!" when they don't have the mental capacity to formulate a response.
I suppose it is easier to construct a facade of knowledge and superiority around the idea of studying music ( where do you study? is it reputable? is it even a university?) instead of actually engaging others that have non-overlapping experiences with your own. if you actually care about classical music why are you so beligerent about establishing your superior knowledge and understanding of it instead of discussing it? it all starts to sound a lot like what you criticize rym users for doing, no?
>>65473444
Yeah, kids like you would think that way.
To be fair me trying to talk to RYM users is like a reasonable person talking to /r/s4p or /r/the_donald. People are too delusional to listen to reason.
>>65473614
1. I don't provide any personal information, as it's been extremely easy to find any person's information on 4chan.
2. What do you want me to say? You don't think my reviews demonstrate an understanding of music theory/history. I think they do. The difference between us is I have that education and can recognize how it applies in my approach to music and writing about it (CASUALLY). While you don't.
>>65473223
RYM and /mu/ are full of clueless teenagers, that's why the level of discourse is so low. So my question is: why not frequent communities specifically geared toward classical music, with actually knowledgeable and seasoned users? Is is because you're incapable of holding your own in a discussion with people who know their shit? Is it because your "music knowledge" is only impressive in contrast to a bunch of autistic teens trying to out-avant each other?
>>65473334
antigona studies film, not music
zizekian is a drone
boldfaure:
do you have a degree? what instrument(s) do you play? have you ever performed music professionally?
>>65473685
pretty sure she studies art in general and works at a museum in France 20 mins away from where she lives
this is actually me
>>65473716
>do you have a degree? what instrument(s) do you play? have you ever performed music professionally?
Yes
<censored>
Yes
Again, super protective of my details.
>>65473646
No it's because TalkClassical is a forum and I fucking hate forum formats.
>>65473646
>>65473805
Just the idea of the forum involving browsing page by page, the terrible system for quoting, the lower level of engagement by users, I mean I'd go to TC if it was usable but not the case unfortunately.
boldfaure you're such a dickhead, I used to like you, but you're just such a twat it's unbelievable, you're a television soap opera stereotype.
>>65473805
><censored>
so, drums?
>fakerates once
>>65473805
>>65473824
So you don't want to actually discuss music. You're just looking for a quick cheap ego boost from words on a screen. Got it.
>>65473825
how shocking
when a person is new to a community and doesn't realize how incredibly shitty it is, they are more friendly than a year later
publish a book m8
>>65473893
>So you don't want to actually discuss music.
Do you seriously think I enjoy going thread to thread and finding clueless people
Do you seriously think this is my ideal situation and preferred choice
I don't want a quick ego boost I just want quick music discussion, which TalkClassical doesn't provide.
>>65473918
If that's true, and you acknowledge that /mu/ and RYM are clueless about classical music (which I agree with), why bother? You offer nothing but snark and condescension. Maybe if you suggested them some reading material or whatever and gave them a few months, they wouldn't be so clueless. But no, all you do is retort with "nope, I have a music degree and I know you're wrong". Again, why even bother?
>>65474075
What comes to mind is "Pearls before swine" but that's not really the case, because the swine desire the pearls.
/mu/ doesn't care that I know more than them, they actively argue that it's unimportant. Recommending Rosen, Boulez, some textbooks isn't going to change their anti-intellectualism. They don't value music to begin with so they aren't going to read some books about it.
>>65474151
More pettiness and condescension, as expected. I won't bother responding to your implication that music cannot be appreciated on a purely sensory level, but I will say one thing: you would be surprised if you knew how many people are interested in learning about music theory and classical music but are put off by the attitude you're exhibiting here. Not that I think you care. Oh well.
https://rateyourmusic.com/~snordine
>mfw starting to rate again
my soul is taken
>>65474343
You're just another kid without a clue. Maybe when you grow up and choose to care about music you'll learn.
holy shit reading through this thread and laughing at how badly boldfaure is getting BTFO. based randomforest taking out the trash
>>65474535
Cute.
>>65474568
>omg john oliver totally destroyed donald trump
- s4p subscriber
>omg random clueless rym profile destroyed boldfaure
- embryos and other newfags
>>65474568
I don't think it's randomforest though?
>>65474691
I stopped posting a while ago, yeah
>>65474632
t. boldfaure
just face it, you come to these threads to sustain your "big fish in a small pond" ego, while contributing nothing of value
>>65474707
Who said I wasn't boldfaure?
>just face it, you come to these threads to sustain your "big fish in a small pond" ego, while contributing nothing of value
No I just want to discuss classical music.
Not my fault idiots then try to contest me and lose.
>>65474777
i've never seen you discuss classical music here beyond projecting your insecurity onto other people's classical ratings (or lack thereof)
>>65474809
Maybe because there are like 2 people on this website with actual classical music knowledge. I know one of them is SDF (and yes he knows far more than me, this is obvious).
>>65473895
that's not what i'm saying, I always knew boldfaure was annoying but I kind of liked him anyway, he's just an utter faggot now and completely unbearable on any level
>>65474908
>he's just an utter faggot now and completely unbearable on any level
That was me btw.
I don't care what people here think, any more than the climatologist cares what the oil executive thinks.
>>65474896
>i come to these threads to discuss classical even though i know for a fact there won't be classical discussion, so i'm just going to bitch about it nonstop everyday instead
>>65474942
if you don't care what people here think and want a discussion on classical music (which you've stated numerous times that this website cannot provide) then fuck off somewhere else where people will indulge your bullshit. there's no actual reason for you to continue talking here from your own perspective because you've said you want to talk classical but you've also said you can't do it here, so why the fuck are you still posting in these threads???
Man you guys are obsessed with me.
Have a good night.
why is katelynn such an insufferable bitch?
she looks like a 12-year-old tranny too
>>65475051
kys
>>65475051
fuck off to bed and don't come back you stupid child
>>65474896
>SDF
what did he mean by this?
>start an album
>don't like it from the get-go
>still give it a chance
>stop about 2/3 of the way through if it's really shitty
>slap a low rating on it
Is this considered 'fake rating'? Could I be banned for rating albums without having heard them in full?
>>65475359
I do that sometimes, no it's not fake rating
>>65475359
that's pretty normal
>>65475472
>>65475492
t. tankpit and TheHorbgorbler
>>65475359
You're fine
Just don't do it for albums you know you're not gonna like going into like Brokencyde or Crazy Frog ya know?
>>65475359
That's fine, also literally everybody on RYM and /mu/ only listens to music for their own enjoyment and does not give a shit about their "image" and what their listening habits are signaling to other people whatsoever
What did he mean by this?
>>65475742
>it is 2016
>people STILL sperg out over idiots mentioning them on here
Golly
why is sissy/notebooks so based
>>65475811
he is gay
>>65475969
proof?
>>65475969
so am i
>tfw i will never pound his bp while we listen to vaporwave
>>65475811
what RYMers are NOT gay?
>>65475177
Schoenberg Defense Force. Probably one of the few quality trips to have graced this board.
redpill me on magicsxxxxx
>>65475811
>thinks pulse demon is 5.0-worthy
literally lmaoing
>tfw chumlum stopped listening to music
Redpill me on daisiesfree
>>65477074
poor man's hardboiledbabe who only went avant because of her boyfriend-at-the-time
>>65477307
hbb wanted to collab w me dont be so mean
we were best friend.
mauricio and i avanted together this is a bully post
>>65477385
who's the girl:) in your avatar and how do i become her bf
>>65477441
I have a joke
Not her though different anon
>>65477385
can you make hbb come back?
What exactly is katelnn's schtick?
Satirizing /jp/ losers and undiscerning "poptomists"? His YouTube seems to imply he has a life.
>>65478377
What exactly is your schtick?
Reposting the same comments in every RYM thread? Your posts seem to imply you have autism.
>>65478469
It's all about autism here isn't it
Rateyourmusic is a music database, not a fetish website
I have only rated 254 albums. How long should I wait until posting my profile here?
>>65478469
>Your posts seem to imply you have autism.
it's ironic how much i see this sentence
>>65478778
Wait until your curve looks like this, then you may post
>>65479567
Terrible
I've been into classical music for about three years, I know I'm not particularly knowledgeable about it but I've read a handful of books about it and know a little theory, enjoy the music and am interested in learning more. I really shouldn't be made to feel like I shitty person for this. boldfaure can fuck off
>>65479993
how are they making you feel like a shitty person
>>65480006
for annoyingly bragging about his superiority to people that share his interest and assuming pretension in them
>>65480033
that ain't you babe
>that one person on your friends list who's always stealing your 5s and 4.5s
who is it /rym/? don't be afraid to name names
>>65480610
i am always that guy, not even a little ashamed
>>65480610
>tfw not avant enough to have people droning me
>>65480610
you mean listening to them, or giving them 5s and 4.5s?
i do the former with some accounts
>>65470685
Who is this?
>>65470736
I liked it too pal
>>65469577
>>65480706
daisiesfree, the biggest avant-qt on rym
>>65471051
Do you know of the weird terrorism suspicions that surround Boulez?
>>65470685
fug off
>>65476931
he stopped a long time ago
now he just plays 2hu all day
hmmm what could he have possibly meant by this?
looks a little familiar, doesn't it?
>>65481247
kys arcadia
>>65481247
>"droned" by a guy with literally over 30k albums in his wishlist
Wow you're a big tastemaker aren't you.
>>65481342
woah someone's salty no one drones your radiohead 5s
>>65481378
I don't whore myself out on RYM threads, so I don't expect people to drone me. Fwiw there are quite a few albums that I made popular or added to the database, including some AntiWarhol 4.5s and 4.0s, so it's only a matter of time before you're droning me too :^)
>>65481425
>I don't whore myself out on RYM threads
ie your taste is too shit to be posted in a thread full of ~300 ratings p4k drones l.o.l.
OFFICIAL AVANT-RANKING
(Elder Gods tier)
>AntiWarhol
>carbonado
(Pure disciples tier)
>aoa
>carburador
>treblekicker
(Contaminated/rejected disciples tier)
>exitsense
>nippongirls
>Kishinev
>Quilled_Investigator
>cacespace
>sodr2
(Shit/meme tier)
>landscape_suicide
>portraits
>EtInArcadiaEgo
>>65481378
good god you're the most image-obsessed attention whore idiot i've ever seen on /mu/ or rym
>hey look this guy rated Witchfiddle! the album i droned from antiwarhol's 4.5s but hey i gave it a 5 so now i own the rights to it so he's obviously droning me xD
>>65481630
goodness you're dumb
p.s. I picked up witchfiddle from dart
>>65481684
>dart
literally fake-rated so much he got permabanned lmao
also got made fun of by antiwarhol's clique almost nonstop
makes sense that you were droning a pathetic image-obsessed person
>>65481709
oh wow, Internet stranger got made fun of by Internet stranger's friends. thanks for the sick intel dude.
>>65481733
the point is that you were following in the footsteps of someone who is respected by no-one and doesn't care about music at all
i guess that's why you turned out the way you did
>>65481772
>following in the footsteps
uh this isn't one of your animes dude. I saw an album he listened to and downloaded it.
>>65481792
right, you admitted that you droned an antiwarhol drone who didn't even listen to the albums he droned. nice damage control
>>65481819
no, I admitted to listening to an album that I saw dart listened to lol
>>65469577
me 2bh
>>65481832
>listened to
wew
>when are you listening to all the stuff you're rating on rym? i can't find it scrobbled on here. is it stuff you've listened to in the past? gggg
What did chumlum mean by this?
>>65481883
He means you dont actually listen to the music you rate, like roughly 60 percent of rym
>>65475811
I miss him around here
https://rateyourmusic.com/~snordine
Hello stoners
>>65483702
why dont you just undeactivate floatings
>>65483702
enjoy your ban idiot
the avant-teen culture is hilarious
RYM artist pages down for anyone else?
Is T_J desperately trying to remain relevant?
Will his popularity soon end when Sonemic launches and all the new users don't give a shit about him?
Will he be the new Elay/Zombie?
>>65484240
more importantly who fucking cares?
Pharoah Sanders - Karma (1969)
Sun Ra - Jazz in Silhouette (1959)
Yusef Lateef - Eastern Sounds (1964)
John Coltrane - A Love Supreme (1965)
Ornette Coleman - The Shape of Jazz to Come (1959)
2/5 stars
why does EtInArcadiaEgo try so hard to be ''''different'''''
>>65484284
more importantly who fucking cares about etinarcadiaego?
>>65484240
the people in his "clique" haven't cared about him for years
i doubt he'll leave voluntarily since he has nothing else going on in his life but if he keeps producing shit like the groupie thread he will inevitably be banned
>>65484284
Someone who has only 4 pages of Jazz rated shouldn't have his opinion on the matter considered at all
>>65484149
I talked to staff and they were fine with it so quit your whining
>>65484240
you talking about telephone?
>>65484346
epithalamion55
what do you think of katelynn's beach boys cover? https://nekoshelf.bandcamp.com/album/mona
what is katelynn doing guys should we help him https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLL_pI9Hf3g
>>65484391
Put "Hi folks" in front of all his new threads and it's basically him.
>>65483408
why would people bother doing that?
How do we get epithalamion to stop making threads?
>>65485455
Get rid of the forums altogether, sad to say.
>>65484284
i believe the point of rym is to catalogue your opinions and not the ones you read on wikipedia? could be wrong
You say Justin Bieber,I say TAKU SUGIMOTO!!!
You say Lady Gaga,I say ANTOINE BEUGER!
You say Taylor Swift,I say SACHIKO M!!
You say 2 Chainz,I say TOSHIMARU NAKAMURA!
You say Lil Wayne,I say MICHAEL PISARO
You say Jonas Brother,I say FUCK YOU!!
92% of teens have turned to pop and hip-hop.If you are part of the 8% that still listens to real music, copy and paste this message to 5 other videos. DON'T LET THE SPIRIT OF EAI AND ONKYO DIE!!!!!!
https://rateyourmusic.com/~MalcolmXWing
Please recommend me a cute album, I will also recommend you a cute album if you like.
>>65472218
this is true
>>65480610
>that one guy that purposely rates them low just to spite me
>>65480610
>those four or five people on my friends list who're always stealing my 5s and 4.5
ftfy
>>65488044
Damn! You must be a big shot! What's your profile?
wdxmbt?
>>65489242
poptimism on suicide watch
>>65470685
lmao at her shoutbox
these virgins thirsty af
How do I acquire /mu/ attention without posting my profile? I want to be considered high-profile RYM user on here.
https://rateyourmusic.com/~bartsimpson89
why is he so based
>>65490155
If you put on a contrived look for attention, it shall not come. - a high-profiled RYM user
threadly reminder that carburador is the mastermind behind it all
>>65490155
Easy mode: be an obnoxious attention-whoring dipshit on the forums/album comment boxes
Hard mode: have a uniquely personal yet interesting and objectively "good" taste in music and film
What's it gonna be
>>65469415
>>65486442
OP is funny because Onkyo barely makes any racket at all
the two girls in daisiesfree's profile pics look almost the same except with different hair color and i can't find either images on reverse google search
i-it can't be, right? it's all a ruse designed to prank the nerds into posting on her comment box and becoming meme material r-right
>>65490523
behind what?
bumpe
>>65470685
it's like a guy actually tho right? I feel like there's no real females on RYM
>>65493200
stay thirsty
>>65470685
>>65491151
>>65494309
reminder of another 'female' rymer who has a female profile picture that can't be found through reverse image search
https://rateyourmusic.com/~epithalamion
it's obviously a ruse
https://rateyourmusic.com/~EtInArcadiaEgo
I REALLY hope you guys went and voted for Eleanor Garcia
>>65494392
>being an american cuck
No thanks
>>65494379
Lel, except epithalamion's picture is obviously a professional shot of a model
>>65470685
Her taste isn't even good though
>>65493200
>>65494379
people like you probably make women hide their real gender on sites like RYM desu
>>65494536
t. jealous uggo
http://www.tinymixtapes.com/news/dominick-fernows-vatican-shadow-release-media-service-terror
I hope you guys are ready for aoty 2016
>>65494569
why do i have to be jealous?
>>65484249
Most of the people in these threads care, don't be rude.
>>65484240
>>65494704
Yeah speculating about RYMers is what we do here instead of watching soap operas
t_j is one of the best users on the site fuck the haters
why do you all hate epithalamion so much???
>>65494379
It's a picture of model Lindsey Wixson
>>65495010
Source?
