This is great, why do people dislike it?
>band releases pop album
>gain huge fanbase of plebs
>release sorta experimental album
>plebs hate it
It happens a lot.
I think some tracks are dragged out but other than its great, in AnCo's top four I'd say
>>65403973
A couple songs I could live without (Rosie Oh, Father Time, Pulleys, Mercury Mad depending on the mood), but everything else is great. And the overall sound of CH is fantastic.
Too much random needless noise and clutter. A lot of unmemorable and annoying songs like Pulleys. No real emotion or "feels". Everything feels synthetic and half hearted, and the lack of creative songs and melodic harmonies is also unfortunate.
Still, PW is much much worse.
>>65403773
I didn't like it when it first came out but I listened to again recently and I really digged it. I don't even really remember why I dislike.
>>65404413
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5ojtx7bR0A
melodies are half-hearted
deakin basically plays along to avey's singing
tough to listen to all the way through w/o hurting your ears
>>65403804
>implying the experimental is automatically better and the "plebs" are misguided
>implying a more experimental album was intentional and not the result of a lack of inspiration
>>65403773
because you are a human being capable of making decisions based on what you personally like and what you do not like. Don't let /mu/ dictate your life!
because it's overproduced and conveys no emotions
>>65404413
>"random" "needless" noise and clutter.
that's the one thing i like about it the most
>>65404596
a very poppy approach would have me assume "lack of inspiration" more than anything
something about a taco on a windshield
