>look up pictures of band
>it's 4 guys with long hair and serious faces wearing jeans, t-shirts, and maybe a hoodie or denim jacket
Why do today's bands all look so boring?
Not to sound like a wrong generation-fag but bands from the 60s-80s put at least a bit of effort into looking interesting, different, catchy, etc. I'm not saying they should make a gimmick out of their appearances but seriously, you're a rockstar, you can get away with wearing anything. A lot of good bands only got the public's attention because they dressed cool / different.
Death Grips, Sufjan, and DIIV are some of the exceptions to this. They look interesting without being gimmicky or taking the focus off of their music
dumb frogposter
retarded frogposter
>>65372864
DIIV look like faggots how is that interesting?
>>65372864
>liking gimmicks
dumb frogposter
Artic Monkeys look cool
>>65372947
Wrong. Faggots tend to wear tight clothes and keep themselves clean cut
>>65373071
At times
>>65372864
old bands look cool to you because you're seeing decades-old fashion and style, it's interesting to see it now, after so much change
>>65372864
Cole is the best dressed musician today.
Still my fav pic of an artist/band.
>>65373689
Fucking hell, he has clothes that fit him. I assumed he was a midget.
>>65372864
dumb frogposter. Why does it matter what a band looks like? So long as the music is good who gives a shit
Literally anytime anyone does anything different with their appearance it's called a gimmick and people argue endlessly over what the point of them dressing differently is. I can see why people would want to avoid that issue.