>Is there something I'm not getting out of it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsSUSXPv9bY
9:08

They are good at using repetition and layering in their music to drown out the listener and put them in a sort of a trance. So be patient with Swans and try to listen to them distraction free

>>65319652
Shite album that's only good to people who want it to be good. Little known fact: This albums origianl name was "The Placebo Affect"

>>65319799
and the seer?

>Affect

>>65319695

doesn't beat this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Z-ufNCiK48

or this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sTN9ozglRo

>>65319652
Stereolab's way too poppy to be post-rock. Something like this requires patience/attention while Stereolab doesn't really require much of either.

>>65320156

Ya but TRNBWA/Mars Audiac Quintet are better than To Be Kind. Why are the vocals on the first tracks emotionless? as in even seeming to lack apathy?

>>65319843
>origianl

>>65320156

>Genres: Art pop, Indie pop, Indie rock, Post-rock, Experimental rock

>>65320371
Do you have autism?

>>65320156
Stereolab is most definitely post rock

The issue here is post rock is such a fucking wide term that you really have no idea what you're getting into without a comparrison to another post-rock band

>>65320578
I just don't see how people could fail to find emotion in Gira's voice unless they had a condition that limited their emotional understanding of others.

Comparing Swans to Stereolab is like comparing apples to quinces. Go listen to Filth: https://youtu.be/RFR_eBXK3p0

File: 28482.jpg (18 KB, 300x300) Image search: [Google]

18 KB, 300x300

>>65319652
I've never been able to "get" swans either. SFTB was the only album I REALLY enjoyed, but even then theres songs like yum yab killers and a bunch of forgettable drone tracks near the end