just in time for the flares revivial

Wew

>>64743217
I actually hope they don't because they run the risk of ruining their legacy if the single (and supposed album) suck hard.

Stone Roses were fucking terrible. Can't say I'm surprised they jumped on the reformation meme, though.

>>64744449
>Stone Roses were fucking terrible

wew lad nice toast I bet you listen to posouer core

>>64744505

""""zing"""

>>64744449
They're one of the only NME-core indie darling bands who actually have redeeming musical qualities. John Squire is a good guitarist

>>64744610

Suede probably hold that title imo, until Coming Up, anyway. He's proficient, sure, but I find them interminably beige.

>>64743217
last few times this happened they just announced a few concerts

The Stone Roses will never make new music again

It's nothing, and if it is something, it will be terrible I think